[DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: Bringing New D-STAR Hardware and Software into the Network - A Proposal

2008-11-16 Thread Ernest Kapphahn
A good topic for discussion.  Maybe we could designate a reflector
channel or two for testing interconnections between linking systems
(Echolink and IRLP).  Much like the Western reflector (IRLP) uses 9258
for connecting to an Echolink conference bridge, we could agree that
one of the channels on a US and another on a EU reflector might be
used for this purpose.  People using those channels would know that
they would not be seeing the digital information we are used to with
D-Star.  It would be a decision of the reflector owners.  Maybe
someone interested in this could establish a reflector dedicated to
that purpose. 

The interconnections would be good for D-Star as users of the other
systems will be impressed with audio and noise-free signals and may
come on board.  

Since these interconnects generally use a dongle to connect to us, I
would guess they could be kept out of other channels by restricting
dongle use but that would not be an optimal solution.  It would really
depend on gentleman's agreements.  I don't think we should attempt to
deny access to the busier channels as emergency situations may make
intercommunication desirable.  

Ernie W6KAP




--- In dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com, John D. Hays [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I am starting this topic (and cross posting to reach as many interested
 parties as possible) to open what hopefully will be a cooperative
dialog to
 establish some guidelines and rules that will help foster
experimentation
 and innovation on D-STAR while respecting the wishes of system
(repeaters,
 gateways, and reflectors) operators.  The result should be a mutally
 agreeable set of terms that everyone can sign on to.
 
 Why is this necessary?
 
 To this point there have been a relatively few developers working on
D-STAR
 projects that have any significant impact on the infrastructure.  There
 currently are at least two gateway replacement projects underway
(OpenDSTAR
 and OpenBridge) and numerous active development projects, some open
and some
 closed that can reach into the network in new ways (for example rtp_dir,
 which provides an alternative to DVTOOL for accessing the network
using the
 DV Dongle, but also has the capability to bridge in other networks
such as
 IRLP, Allstar/Asterisk, and Echolink).  The development of some of these
 tools can be disruptive to systems if not properly developed and
vetted to
 the community.
 
 It is hoped that we can get a spirit of cooperation on software and
hardware
 development to further D-STAR as the new Digital standard for
Amateur Radio
 local and linked communications.
 
 Here are my starting points.  The guidelines should be short, to the
point,
 few and clear.
 
 Part 1 - D-STAR Reflectors
 
 1. The owners of reflectors, repeaters, and gateways have a right to
manage
 their systems in the best interests of their respective user
communities.
 1.1 Use of these resources for *testing *new software and/or
hardware should
 only be undertaken by the consent of the operator or their
designated agent.
 1.2 *Linking* to D-STAR reflectors shall be treated equally by class of
 connection. In other words if you permit software/hardware from one
 developer/manufacturer, that has followed the principles of this
agreement
 on your reflector, you must treat all similar technology in the class
 equally. You can discriminate based on regulatory requirements of
your on
 air licensing authority, illegal activity, or if the content is
generally
 and consistently offensive by connection source (operator) Example
classes
 include:
 1.2.1 Individual operators using Internet connections by a device
like the
 DV Dongle (Examples: DVTool, rtp_dir in non-bridged single operator
mode)
 1.2.2 A native D-STAR gateway using G2, DPLUS, or similar linking
 1.2.3 A bridged native D-STAR reflector
 1.2.4 A non-native (e.g. Analog FM) repeater using a device like the DV
 Dongle under automatic control.
 1.2.5 A non-native reflector (IRLP or EchoLink) using a device like
the DV
 Dongle under automatic control.
 1.2.6 A non-native repeater or reflector with a control operator
actively
 monitoring and managing the connection.
 1.3 Cross linking of non-native D-STAR and D-STAR gateways,
reflectors, or
 repeaters for routine networks will only be undertaken upon mutual
agreement
 of the operators of the respective systems.
 1.3.1 Immediate emergency communications (safety of Life or
Property) does
 not require prior agreement for short linking to facilitate that
 communication.
 1.4 Short demonstrations by any accepted class of operation are
permitted
 without prior permission if the reflector is not in active use by a
 scheduled net or operating activity.
 1.5 Operators of D-STAR reflectors will politely notify users, of any
 connection class, if there is a problem with the use of the reflector.
 1.5.1 Operators of the connecting system will comply with published
 standards for a reflector..
 1.5.2 If the operator of a connecting system will not comply the

[DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: Bringing New D-STAR Hardware and Software into the Network - A Proposal

2008-11-16 Thread k7ve
Ernie - Thanks for your thoughts. 

All - could we keep the followup to the thread on dstarsoftware Yahoo!
group. I sent the original posting to a few groups to reach a wide
audience, but it would be great to centralize the followup discussion - 
73 DE K7VE



[DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: Bringing New D-STAR Hardware and Software into the Network - A Proposal

2008-11-16 Thread Mike
, but also has the capability to bridge in other networks such as
 IRLP, and Echolink).

IRLP  Echolink are designed for analogue systems, they are not 
compatible with DStar as they are audio systems only. 

DStar is much more than an audio system.

Just because something can be done, it doesn't automatically mean that 
it should be done.

By all means develop DStar, but connecting analogue audio systems is a 
backward step.

Mike G1ZRN.