Re: OT:Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: New guy: Non RF Guys

[Chris Fowler]

On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 00:10 +, ki4umx wrote:
 In one word NO! The UR (YOUR) field is 8 digits - if you count the
 digits (including the /) it totals 8, with the port in the 8th
 position. IF the repeater had a 5 digit call(i.e. W1AAD) THEN THERE
 WOULD be a space (/W1AAD C). The PORT must be in the 8th position and
 you have to add one or two spaces for shorter calls.
 
 

And what is really annoying is how the programming software does not use
fixed width fonts.  I find myself counting each thing I type otherwise I
will put the port name in the 6th or 7th field instead.

Chris

RE: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Accuracy

[Woodrick, Ed]

It's as accurate as the information that users and system administrators send 
in.

If there's any updates, please send them to 
i...@dstarinfo.commailto:i...@dstarinfo.com and I'll get it updated. In most 
cases I think that it is fairly well up to date. It's definitely not a static 
thing.

Ed WA4YIH

From: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com [mailto:dstar_digi...@yahoogroups.com] On 
Behalf Of dstarfanatic
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2010 1:32 PM
To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Accuracy



Hello, reviewing the reflector list from

http://www.dstarinfo.com/Reflectors/Reflectors.aspx

there seems to be some questionable details. For example
REF017C French speaking Belgian repeaters in Wallonia / North Carolina Nets.
North Carolina nets in Belgium?

Just curious as to how accurate the list is.

Part Deux
Has anyone linked to either experimental reflector XRF010 Germany or XRF267 New 
York? What is the proper data stream sequence since there is no port 
assignment? EXAMPLE XRF267 L with or without a space.

73s