Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Automatic Operation - Control Point Definition

2010-02-16 Thread John D. Hays
I think it's pretty clear that the FCC is applying Repeater and Auxillary
rules

-- 
John D. Hays
Phone:  206-801-0820
801-790-0950
Fax:  866-309-6077
Email:   j...@hays.org
VOIP/SIP: j...@hays.org


[DSTAR_DIGITAL] Automatic Operation - Control Point Definition

2010-02-09 Thread Woodrick, Ed
With the popularity of hotspots, cross-band repeaters and other devices, I got 
to thinking about the legal classification of these devices and what it means 
to their operation. I don't really want to start a 400 message discussion, but 
to allow each of you to contemplate what you believe to be in accordance to the 
law where you live.

I know for a fact that this can be debated until, well, forever, let's not do 
it here.

I'm going to express my statements from US FCC Part 97, other countries may be 
different. Consult your local rules and regulations for details.

When is a hotspot a repeater? Is it when it operates on two different 
frequencies? Just what is it?

From Part 97.3 (a) (39)
(39) Repeater. An amateur station that simultaneously retransmits the 
transmission of another amateur station on a different channel or channels.

Okay, different channels. But what happens if two simplex nodes are connected 
together? Aren't they transmitting on different channels? Does that make it a 
repeater? Or is it the fact that they are different stations that make them not 
a repeater?

But then again, it also sounds a lot like an auxiliary station
(7) Auxiliary station. An amateur station, other than in a message forwarding 
system, that is transmitting communications point-to-point within a system of 
cooperating amateur stations.

Well, that sounds a little closer. But why wouldn't we just call it a standard 
ham radio station?

And then that's 97.113 (f)
(f) No amateur station, except an auxiliary, repeater or space station, may 
automatically retransmit the radio signals of other amateur stations.

Whoops, that automatically retransmit becomes a problem.

So what does automatic mean

Which Automatic Control is defined in 97.3 (6) as
(6) Automatic control. The use of devices and procedures for control of a 
station when it is transmitting so that compliance with the FCC Rules is 
achieved without the control operator being present at a control point.

So it boils down to control operator at a control point. This one has been 
debated for many years. Does it mean that the control operator has to push the 
microphone? Do they have to be in the room and watch every action that occurs? 
Can they be 100 miles away, but always monitoring and able to send a command 
turn off the transmitter?

But what probably defines automatic control is when a control operator is not 
listening and a transmission occurs.

Why does it matter? A few reasons:

* A repeater or auxiliary station is limited to they frequencies that 
they may operate at

* A repeater may require coordination

* A system that is not a repeater, nor auxiliary station may always 
have to be under positive control


So think about this as you deploy things such as cross-band repeaters or access 
points. Are they correctly operated? Are they correctly identified? Are they on 
an appropriate frequency?

We've already had one ruling by the FCC about D-STAR repeaters and that didn't 
go the way that many organizations had hoped. Let's not force another ruling.


Ed WA4YIH


Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Automatic Operation - Control Point Definition

2010-02-09 Thread Adrian



We've already had one ruling by the FCC about D-STAR repeaters and 
that didn't go the way that many organizations had hoped. Let's not 
force another ruling.


Ed WA4YIH



Hi Ed, What was that ruling, for those of us unaware please?

73

vk4tux


Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Automatic Operation - Control Point Definition

2010-02-09 Thread Nate Duehr

On 2/9/2010 11:24 AM, Woodrick, Ed wrote:


With the popularity of hotspots, cross-band repeaters and other 
devices, I got to thinking about the legal classification of these 
devices and what it means to their operation. I don't really want to 
start a 400 message discussion, but to allow each of you to 
contemplate what you believe to be in accordance to the law where you 
live.




No debate necessary.  Easier to base the answer on facts. :-)

ARRL's Legal Counsel (Chris Imlay) made it clear that simplex EchoLink 
and IRLP stations were Auxiliary Stations many years ago after 
consultation with various FCC folks. FCC never published a written opinion.


Logically then, a D-STAR HotSpot is the same, with digital modulation 
instead of analog.


The usual problem that comes up when discussing this is that people 
don't READ in these mailing lists, and someone assuredly will think 
you're talking about REPEATERS, miss that you're talking about the 
HotSpot, and freak out.  We'll see if this thread triggers that. ;-)


The reason this all came up heavily back then: Auxiliary Stations used 
to be banned in low VHF spectrum, and only allowable at 222.15 MHz and 
above.  A rules change a number of years ago fixed that, probably 
because by then, there were hundreds and hundreds of illegally operating 
simplex EchoLink and IRLP nodes at the time.  Part 97 has been changed.


IRLP and EchoLink went through this what is it legally process for the 
U.S.rules for simplex linked stations, ten years ago... ARRL published 
the answer far and wide, including in the magazine.


I've got the PDF somewhere... on a hard drive... somewhere... 
copyrighted by ARRL so I can't post it anywhere anyway... (I asked.)  
Other people have it posted on the web, and feel they'll go ahead and 
risk infringement of the Copyright.  :-)


Nate WY0X


Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Automatic Operation - Control Point Definition

2010-02-09 Thread Nate Duehr

On 2/9/2010 11:42 AM, Adrian wrote:


We've already had one ruling by the FCC about D-STAR repeaters and 
that didn't go the way that many organizations had hoped. Let's not 
force another ruling.


Ed WA4YIH



Hi Ed, What was that ruling, for those of us unaware please?


Adrian,

He's referring to the FCC's published opinion that D-STAR repeaters are 
repeaters and must be operated in our repeater sub-band.  Folks early on 
were asserting that since they're digital, they're data and could be 
operated lower than our repeater sub-band in our data segment.  FCC 
didn't agree.


In general, the problem only came up on immensely overpopulated areas of 
the country that any sane person would move away from.  (GRIN!  Poke, 
poke, Californians... LOL!  Just kidding.)  In other areas, we managed 
to find open repeater pairs and wedge D-STAR into the existing 
band-plans and repeater spectrum.


Today, the problem is somewhat alleviating itself in *most* areas 
because *finally* coordinators have gotten around to clearing paper 
repeaters and opening up spectrum that wasn't adequately utilized in 
VHF.  In *most* areas UHF was not a problem.  1.2 Ghz, ditto of 
course... plenty of spectrum there to play in.


Nate WY0X


RE: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Automatic Operation - Control Point Definition

2010-02-09 Thread Woodrick, Ed
That D-STAR repeaters were indeed a repeater. There was a contingent that was 
trying to portray a D-STAR system as not a repeater. Because the signal is time 
delayed, it is a lot more like a packet node than a repeater. This would allow 
for a lot more frequencies to be used in the US. But the FCC ruled that if it 
receives on one and retransmits on another, even though there was  a time 
delay, then it was a repeater.

It might sound obvious, but when you are trying to find 2M frequencies, you'll 
sometimes try really hard to stretch the rules the way you want them to be.

Ed WA4YIH

From: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com [mailto:dstar_digi...@yahoogroups.com] On 
Behalf Of Adrian
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 1:43 PM
To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Automatic Operation - Control Point Definition



We've already had one ruling by the FCC about D-STAR repeaters and that didn't 
go the way that many organizations had hoped. Let's not force another ruling.


Ed WA4YIH

Hi Ed, What was that ruling, for those of us unaware please?

73

vk4tux