Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Automatic Operation - Control Point Definition

2010-02-16 Thread John D. Hays
I think it's pretty clear that the FCC is applying Repeater and Auxillary
rules

-- 
John D. Hays
Phone:  206-801-0820
801-790-0950
Fax:  866-309-6077
Email:   j...@hays.org
VOIP/SIP: j...@hays.org


Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Automatic Operation - Control Point Definition

2010-02-09 Thread Tony Langdon
At 05:56 AM 2/10/2010, Nate Duehr wrote:


>I've got the PDF somewhere... on a hard drive... somewhere... 
>copyrighted by ARRL so I can't post it anywhere anyway... (I 
>asked.)  Other people have it posted on the web, and feel they'll go 
>ahead and risk infringement of the Copyright.  :-)

If it was in QST, ARRL members can look for it online.  No need to 
reinvent the wheel here, unless there's some odd quirks in US regs, I 
don't see why the interpretations for Echolink and IRLP can't be 
applied to Hotspots.

73 de VK3JED / VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com



RE: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Automatic Operation - Control Point Definition

2010-02-09 Thread Woodrick, Ed
That D-STAR repeaters were indeed a repeater. There was a contingent that was 
trying to portray a D-STAR system as not a repeater. Because the signal is time 
delayed, it is a lot more like a packet node than a repeater. This would allow 
for a lot more frequencies to be used in the US. But the FCC ruled that if it 
receives on one and retransmits on another, even though there was  a time 
delay, then it was a repeater.

It might sound obvious, but when you are trying to find 2M frequencies, you'll 
sometimes try really hard to stretch the rules the way you want them to be.

Ed WA4YIH

From: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com [mailto:dstar_digi...@yahoogroups.com] On 
Behalf Of Adrian
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 1:43 PM
To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Automatic Operation - Control Point Definition



We've already had one ruling by the FCC about D-STAR repeaters and that didn't 
go the way that many organizations had hoped. Let's not force another ruling.


Ed WA4YIH

Hi Ed, What was that ruling, for those of us unaware please?

73

vk4tux



Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Automatic Operation - Control Point Definition

2010-02-09 Thread Nate Duehr

On 2/9/2010 11:42 AM, Adrian wrote:


We've already had one ruling by the FCC about D-STAR repeaters and 
that didn't go the way that many organizations had hoped. Let's not 
force another ruling.


Ed WA4YIH



Hi Ed, What was that ruling, for those of us unaware please?


Adrian,

He's referring to the FCC's published opinion that D-STAR repeaters are 
repeaters and must be operated in our repeater sub-band.  Folks early on 
were asserting that since they're digital, they're "data" and could be 
operated lower than our repeater sub-band in our "data" segment.  FCC 
didn't agree.


In general, the problem only came up on immensely overpopulated areas of 
the country that any sane person would move away from.  (GRIN!  Poke, 
poke, Californians... LOL!  Just kidding.)  In other areas, we managed 
to find open repeater pairs and wedge D-STAR into the existing 
band-plans and repeater spectrum.


Today, the problem is somewhat alleviating itself in *most* areas 
because *finally* coordinators have gotten around to clearing paper 
repeaters and opening up spectrum that wasn't adequately utilized in 
VHF.  In *most* areas UHF was not a problem.  1.2 Ghz, ditto of 
course... plenty of spectrum there to play in.


Nate WY0X


Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Automatic Operation - Control Point Definition

2010-02-09 Thread Nate Duehr

On 2/9/2010 11:24 AM, Woodrick, Ed wrote:


With the popularity of hotspots, cross-band repeaters and other 
devices, I got to thinking about the legal classification of these 
devices and what it means to their operation. I don't really want to 
start a 400 message discussion, but to allow each of you to 
contemplate what you believe to be in accordance to the law where you 
live.




No debate necessary.  Easier to base the answer on facts. :-)

ARRL's Legal Counsel (Chris Imlay) made it clear that simplex EchoLink 
and IRLP stations were Auxiliary Stations many years ago after 
consultation with various FCC folks. FCC never published a written opinion.


Logically then, a D-STAR HotSpot is the same, with digital modulation 
instead of analog.


The usual problem that comes up when discussing this is that people 
don't READ in these mailing lists, and someone assuredly will think 
you're talking about REPEATERS, miss that you're talking about the 
HotSpot, and freak out.  We'll see if this thread triggers that. ;-)


The reason this all came up heavily back then: Auxiliary Stations used 
to be banned in low VHF spectrum, and only allowable at 222.15 MHz and 
above.  A rules change a number of years ago "fixed" that, probably 
because by then, there were hundreds and hundreds of illegally operating 
simplex EchoLink and IRLP nodes at the time.  Part 97 has been changed.


IRLP and EchoLink went through this "what is it legally" process for the 
U.S.rules for simplex linked stations, ten years ago... ARRL published 
the answer far and wide, including in the magazine.


I've got the PDF somewhere... on a hard drive... somewhere... 
copyrighted by ARRL so I can't post it anywhere anyway... (I asked.)  
Other people have it posted on the web, and feel they'll go ahead and 
risk infringement of the Copyright.  :-)


Nate WY0X


Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Automatic Operation - Control Point Definition

2010-02-09 Thread Adrian



We've already had one ruling by the FCC about D-STAR repeaters and 
that didn't go the way that many organizations had hoped. Let's not 
force another ruling.


Ed WA4YIH



Hi Ed, What was that ruling, for those of us unaware please?

73

vk4tux