Re: [dwm] Java patch
Hi any joy regarding this? Kind regards, Anselm On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 09:22:08AM -0300, Luiz Ribeiro wrote: Great idea! I'll work on it and post the source code later. On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 7:57 AM, Tuncer Ayaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Tuncer Ayaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 01:43:14PM -0700, Don Stewart wrote: luizribeiro: On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Jukka Salmi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It doesn't work for me. Just tested with jdk 1.5.0 and netbeans... I think the LG3D Java compatibility came with jdk 1.6. Remember that the hack sets the NET_WM_NAME to LG3D. Maybe setting it to a different name could work with jdk 1.5. But I'm not sure about that, or what window manager name you should use. This patch has been in xmonad for a while, there's some more documentation here, http://xmonad.org/xmonad-docs/xmonad-contrib/XMonad-Hooks-SetWMName.html Several users have reported this as useful. So why not converting this patch into a standalone setwmname application written in C, then we can delete the patches in dwm and XMonad and people just run setwmname FooBarBaz to work around the XToolkit bug(s)? assuming that's possible, +1. I still prefer using a fixed OpenJDK-6 build, btw. -- Luiz Ribeiro http://luizribeiro.org/ -- Anselm R. Garbe http://www.suckless.org/ GPG key: 0D73F361
Re: [dwm] more consistent codestyle patch
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 06:08:59PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: On 5/13/08, Diego Biurrun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: XGrabButton(dpy, AnyButton, AnyModifier, c-win, False, - BUTTONMASK, GrabModeAsync, GrabModeSync, None, None); + BUTTONMASK, GrabModeAsync, GrabModeSync, None, None); Well, before it was indented to align with the XGrabButton call. This used spaces to achieve this which is wrong A lot of people seem to argue over tab vs. spaces but somehow don't realize that the best (at least in my opinion) is to combine them in a smart way. That is, use tabs for indention and spaces for further alignment: ---XGrabButton(dpy, AnyButton, AnyModifier, c-win, False, ---BUTTONMASK, GrabModeAsync, GrabModeSync, None, None); This way the user can set the tabwidth to whatever he likes and the code will still look decent. Regards, Marc -- Marc Andre Tanner http://www.brain-dump.org/ GPG key: CF7D56C0
Re: [dwm] [ANNOUNCE] dvtm-0.4.1
Hi, Hi Marc, I tried using dvtm in console (using frame buffer) and I had a few problems: * Fonts in Midnight Commander looks terrible I can't reproduce it here, did you compile it with make unicode? * Background color from vim gets stuck after closing program What exactly do you mean by that? Didn't notice it so far. Thanks, Marc -- Marc Andre Tanner http://www.brain-dump.org/ GPG key: CF7D56C0
Re: [dwm] more consistent codestyle patch
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 03:54:10PM +0200, Marc Andre Tanner wrote: On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 06:08:59PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: On 5/13/08, Diego Biurrun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: XGrabButton(dpy, AnyButton, AnyModifier, c-win, False, - BUTTONMASK, GrabModeAsync, GrabModeSync, None, None); + BUTTONMASK, GrabModeAsync, GrabModeSync, None, None); Well, before it was indented to align with the XGrabButton call. This used spaces to achieve this which is wrong A lot of people seem to argue over tab vs. spaces but somehow don't realize that the best (at least in my opinion) is to combine them in a smart way. That is, use tabs for indention and spaces for further alignment: ---XGrabButton(dpy, AnyButton, AnyModifier, c-win, False, ---BUTTONMASK, GrabModeAsync, GrabModeSync, None, None); This way the user can set the tabwidth to whatever he likes and the code will still look decent. Actually that's the way I intend to have the source code -- imho I used this already quite a lot. I didn't bother that much so far, because I'm going to polish the code anyways for the upcoming dwm-5.0 release. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe http://www.suckless.org/ GPG key: 0D73F361
Re: [dwm] more consistent codestyle patch
Marc Andre Tanner wrote: [...] That is, use tabs for indention and spaces for further alignment: ---XGrabButton(dpy, AnyButton, AnyModifier, c-win, False, ---BUTTONMASK, GrabModeAsync, GrabModeSync, None, None); This way the user can set the tabwidth to whatever he likes and the code will still look decent. *drool* Is there a tool that does this? Kai
Re: [dwm] dijkstra quote
Archie Elberling dixit (2008-05-15, 10:48): Your [webmail server's?] clock is wrong. Your e-mail was sent from the future (see the attribution time). H. Interesting - although it doesn't look like dietlinux has really been maintained over the past few years. dietlibc has though, so perhaps its not impossible (anyone here bored with merely having a suckless windowing manager?). uclibc / uclinux looks a more maintained approach, but I'm not sure how much better than glibc it is ( apart from the building smaller binaries bit). Perhaps I'll boot up a vm and see what I can put together. -- [a] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [dwm] more consistent codestyle patch
On (14/05/08 16:24), Kai Grossjohann wrote: To: dynamic window manager dwm@suckless.org From: Kai Grossjohann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [dwm] more consistent codestyle patch User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505) Reply-To: dynamic window manager dwm@suckless.org List-Id: dynamic window manager dwm.suckless.org Marc Andre Tanner wrote: [...] That is, use tabs for indention and spaces for further alignment: ---XGrabButton(dpy, AnyButton, AnyModifier, c-win, False, ---BUTTONMASK, GrabModeAsync, GrabModeSync, None, None); This way the user can set the tabwidth to whatever he likes and the code will still look decent. *drool* Is there a tool that does this? Kai indent(1) and there are other programs that this do. -- Premysl Anydot Hruby, http://www.redrum.cz/
Re: [dwm] more consistent codestyle patch
Premysl Hruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On (14/05/08 16:24), Kai Grossjohann wrote: To: dynamic window manager dwm@suckless.org From: Kai Grossjohann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [dwm] more consistent codestyle patch User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505) Reply-To: dynamic window manager dwm@suckless.org List-Id: dynamic window manager dwm.suckless.org Marc Andre Tanner wrote: [...] That is, use tabs for indention and spaces for further alignment: ---XGrabButton(dpy, AnyButton, AnyModifier, c-win, False, ---BUTTONMASK, GrabModeAsync, GrabModeSync, None, None); This way the user can set the tabwidth to whatever he likes and the code will still look decent. *drool* Is there a tool that does this? Kai indent(1) and there are other programs that this do. I can confirm (I tried it) that indent doesn't supports some options which would be necessary to imitate dwm style and therefore enable automatic style testing. So indent might be a useful tool if you use GNU style or KNF, but otherwise it's simply useless. Regards Matthias-Christian
Re: [dwm] more consistent codestyle patch
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 06:08:59PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: On 5/13/08, Diego Biurrun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: XGrabButton(dpy, AnyButton, AnyModifier, c-win, False, - BUTTONMASK, GrabModeAsync, GrabModeSync, None, None); + BUTTONMASK, GrabModeAsync, GrabModeSync, None, None); Well, before it was indented to align with the XGrabButton call. This used spaces to achieve this which is wrong You have an interesting concept of wrong. It was certainly intentional. was consistently done in at least a few places and makes the code more readable. no (it was consistently tab only indenting in most places) It was consistently aligned with the help of tabs and spaces. You have undone that in your patch. Diego
Re: [dwm] more consistent codestyle patch
On 5/14/08, Diego Biurrun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: used spaces to achieve this which is wrong You have an interesting concept of wrong. It was certainly intentional. no (it was consistently tab only indenting in most places) It was consistently aligned with the help of tabs and spaces. You have undone that in your patch. no and yes ok it was a misunderstanding i asked arg if it's right to make style cleanup and also asked him if i should **use spaces everywhere in case of indented wraps because imho that's the right way to do it (in most places the code uses tabs for this)** he said that he prefered tabs everywhere so i cleaned up the code with this in mind (== spaces are wrong there) now i see he misunderstood my intentions, but at least now everyone agrees on the style ;)
