Re: [dwm] wildcard in client rules tags ref
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 09:06:22PM -0700, Eric Davis wrote:
> DWM used to support regular expressions in the tags ref for client
> rules. I agree that the feature was overkill but it was nice to be able
> to say "*" so a client is on all tags. I used this for background
> notification popups from scripts with gxmessage.
>
> Is it possible to add a simple glob indicator back to DWM that specifies
> all tags? Or is there another way to do this that I overlooked...?
See attached patch, however I'm not sure I like this approach
for the mainstream dwm.
If you want the behavior it is possible with the following
approach already in mainstream dwm, but you might not like it:
{ NULL, "gxmessage", NULL, tags[0], True },
{ NULL, "gxmessage", NULL, tags[1], True },
{ NULL, "gxmessage", NULL, tags[2], True },
{ NULL, "gxmessage", NULL, tags[3], True },
...
{ NULL, "gxmessage", NULL, tags[8], True },
Kind regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
diff -r 58a67fab8143 -r b9bb1d036bd0 dwm.c
--- a/dwm.c Wed May 14 11:24:35 2008 +0100
+++ b/dwm.c Thu May 15 10:47:26 2008 +0100
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ Window root, barwin;
void
applyrules(Client *c) {
- unsigned int i;
+ unsigned int i, j;
Bool matched = False;
Rule *r;
XClassHint ch = { 0 };
@@ -254,7 +254,11 @@ applyrules(Client *c) {
&& (!r->instance || (ch.res_name && strstr(ch.res_name, r->instance {
c->isfloating = r->isfloating;
if(r->tag) {
-c->tags[idxoftag(r->tag)] = True;
+if(r->tag[0] == '*' && r->tag[1] == 0)
+ for(j = 0; j < LENGTH(tags); i++)
+ c->tags[j] = True;
+else
+ c->tags[idxoftag(r->tag)] = True;
matched = True;
}
}
Re: [dwm] a bottomstack and togglebar
A bstack plugin would totally make my day ^^
The togglebar functionality can also be accomplished with DEFGEOM:
DEFGEOM(nobar, -bw, 0, sw, 0, 0, sw, sh, wx, wy, 0.55*sw, wh, mx+mw,
wy, ww-mw, wh, wx, wy, ww, wh)
Greetings
Rockwolf
On Tue, 13 May 2008, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> a possible bottomstack or togglebar for current tip with a modified
> updategeom()
>
> showbar: bar is visible (or invisible)
> topbar: bar position is at top (or bottom)
> verticalsplit: master/stack split is vertical (or horizontal)
> topleftmaster: master is on top/left (or bottom/right)
>
> these can be macros in config.h so compiler can optimize away the ugly
> conditions or can be ints so eg togglebar() can be implemented as
> int showbar = 1;
> void up(void) {updategeom(); updatebar(); arrange();}
> void togglebar(const char *arg) {showbar = !showbar; up();}
>
>
> void
> updategeom(void) {
> /* bar geometry */
> bx = 0;
> by = showbar ? (topbar ? 0 : sh - bh) : -bh;
> bw = sw;
>
> /* window area geometry */
> wx = sx;
> wy = showbar && topbar ? sy + bh : sy;
> ww = sw;
> wh = showbar ? sh - bh : sh;
>
> /* master area geometry */
> mw = verticalsplit ? mfact * ww : ww;
> mh = verticalsplit ? wh : mfact * wh;
> mx = verticalsplit && !topleftmaster ? wx + ww - mw : wx;
> my = !verticalsplit && !topleftmaster ? wy + wh - mh : wy;
>
> /* tile area geometry */
> tx = verticalsplit && topleftmaster ? wx + mw : wx;
> ty = !verticalsplit && topleftmaster ? wy + mh : wy;
> tw = verticalsplit ? ww - mw : ww;
> th = verticalsplit ? wh : wh - mh;
> }
>
---
--
Andy Nagels
Astridlaan 29
2580 Putte
tel.: 015/756822
mobile: 0474/827578
e-mail (privat):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+
This mail was signed using GnuPG...
You can get my public key like this
with gpg:
gpg --recv-keys 0x5475F368
if you use one of the following
keyservers in your gpg.conf:
hkp://keyserver.veridis.com:11371/
hkp://subkeys.pgp.net/
or you can search for my name or
e-mail address on
http://keyserver.veridis.com:11371/
http://subkeys.pgp.net/
pgpKPwBz6Npky.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: [dwm] wildcard in client rules tags ref
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:56:02AM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 09:06:22PM -0700, Eric Davis wrote:
> > DWM used to support regular expressions in the tags ref for client
> > rules. I agree that the feature was overkill but it was nice to be able
> > to say "*" so a client is on all tags. I used this for background
> > notification popups from scripts with gxmessage.
> >
> > Is it possible to add a simple glob indicator back to DWM that specifies
> > all tags? Or is there another way to do this that I overlooked...?
>
> See attached patch, however I'm not sure I like this approach
> for the mainstream dwm.
>
> If you want the behavior it is possible with the following
> approach already in mainstream dwm, but you might not like it:
>
> { NULL, "gxmessage", NULL, tags[0], True },
> { NULL, "gxmessage", NULL, tags[1], True },
> { NULL, "gxmessage", NULL, tags[2], True },
> { NULL, "gxmessage", NULL, tags[3], True },
> ...
> { NULL, "gxmessage", NULL, tags[8], True },
>
Sometimes the simplest approaches are greatly overlooked! Having the
multiple tag rules works great and I think is a good solution.
Note that, for me, you're patch caused dwm to hang. It wouldn't take
any keyboard input and no gxmessage windows were shown... but dwm did
respond to HUP and came back to life.
Another solution which might be even better is to use dzen.
Thanks,
- e
Re: [dwm] wildcard in client rules tags ref
2008/5/15 Eric Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:56:02AM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
>> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 09:06:22PM -0700, Eric Davis wrote:
>> > DWM used to support regular expressions in the tags ref for client
>> > rules. I agree that the feature was overkill but it was nice to be able
>> > to say "*" so a client is on all tags. I used this for background
>> > notification popups from scripts with gxmessage.
>> >
>> > Is it possible to add a simple glob indicator back to DWM that specifies
>> > all tags? Or is there another way to do this that I overlooked...?
>>
>> See attached patch, however I'm not sure I like this approach
>> for the mainstream dwm.
>>
>> If you want the behavior it is possible with the following
>> approach already in mainstream dwm, but you might not like it:
>>
>> { NULL, "gxmessage", NULL, tags[0], True },
>> { NULL, "gxmessage", NULL, tags[1], True },
>> { NULL, "gxmessage", NULL, tags[2], True },
>> { NULL, "gxmessage", NULL, tags[3], True },
>> ...
>> { NULL, "gxmessage", NULL, tags[8], True },
>>
>
> Sometimes the simplest approaches are greatly overlooked! Having the
> multiple tag rules works great and I think is a good solution.
>
> Note that, for me, you're patch caused dwm to hang. It wouldn't take
> any keyboard input and no gxmessage windows were shown... but dwm did
> respond to HUP and came back to life.
>
> Another solution which might be even better is to use dzen.
>
> Thanks,
> - e
>
>
>
Of course it crashed, did you correct the typo? The i++ in the for
loop should be j++
--
- yiyus || JGL .
Re: [dwm] a bottomstack and togglebar
On 5/15/08, Andy Nagels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The togglebar functionality can also be accomplished with DEFGEOM: DEFGEOM was removed from dwm 5.0 btw you have one hell of a signatre there ;)
