Hmm that reminds me sometimes when i listen to my fav station(s) as RTM
Sarawak, as dedicated fun of Msian music or some other standard QRM outlets
that are beyond this post...Luckily 9835 is clear with limited QRM from the
nearby freqs
Subject: Re: [HCDX] Observations on Oman, Paul Walker
To: "hard-core...@hard-core-dx.com" , "Zach"
Date: Wednesday, September 27, 2017, 1:11 PM
And and on the subject of contact Stations that interfere with one I like...
what’s wrong with that? I find something I enjoy, and other
stations and harming the Reception so I make an effort to have it
rectified when I don’t think said Reception of Oman 15140 should be
harmed. So what? It didn’t take me
but an hour or so to contact the
authorities
in Cuba and India and right the emails.
DXers may not be a Stations target area but if
we don’t say something, we
never know what
the outcome could be.
We
should never just accept interference just because we are
“DX’ers” so I
am attempting to do
something about it
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 5:09
AM WHO DARES WINS
wrote:
> Paul,
>
> I find it hilariously
funny that the same DXer you constantly harass is
> the same "full time DXer" whom
you emulate daily with your style of
>
reporting logs, your logging language, and now going as far
as telling us
> you've been
contacting offending stations transmitting on the same
> frequency as your beloved 15140, Oman,
which your referenced "full time
>
DXer" has been doing with success daily for years with
other stations
> causing QRM on the same
time and frequency. Many times this "full time DXer
> has had much success with stations taking
his observations seriously, and
> making
changes only because he does DX daily as his primary
occupation. I
> in the past also had many
battles with said DXer you mention with continued
> venom, but found even though his
corrective style at times rubbed me raw,
> he was correct in pointing out my wrong
logs. Perhaps you as I did can
> learn
from him and as I did became more careful in my logging
entries?
> Your continued proclamation of
logged headlines of "NEW" DXed stations for
> you are and have been reported for years
by many others in the Hobby. I'm
>
not saying that it's not interesting your picking up
another NEW station
> for you, but for
even casual SW DXers these stations usually are easy
> catches. Living in the lower 48 makes
these stations the norm for most of
> us
and doesn't generate much in the form of replies from
other DX logger's.
> I know your a
member of NASWA as I once was and you do receive their
> weekly SW Flash Sheet which for years has
had these same "NEW" stations
>
listed quite frequently by several part time and full time
log reporters
> myself included. The only
time I ever got responses on my logs were if I
> picked up truly new non reported or hard
to catch Shortwave stations.
>
>
> John C.
>
> _
> Hard-Core-DX mailing list
> hard-core...@hard-core-dx.com
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx
> http://www.hard-core-dx.com/
>
___
>
> THE INFORMATION IN
THIS ARTICLE IS FREE. It may be copied, distributed
> and/or modified under the conditions set
down in the Design Science License
>
published by Michael Stutz at
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/dsl.html
>
_
Hard-Core-DX mailing list
hard-core...@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx
http://www.hard-core-dx.com/
___
THE INFORMATION IN THIS
ARTICLE IS FREE. It may be copied, distributed
and/or modified under the conditions set down
in the Design Science License
published by
Michael Stutz at
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/dsl.html
_
Hard-Core-DX mailing list
hard-core...@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx
http://www.hard-core-dx.com/
___
THE INFORMATION IN THIS ARTICLE IS FREE. It may be copied, distributed
and/or modified under the conditions set down in the Design Science License
published by Michael Stutz at
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/dsl.html