[DX-CHAT] Just curious ....

2009-12-05 Thread W0WOI

There is a small, but enthusiastic, group of 50 mHz operators using the  
WSJT mode for no hear them EME QSOs and DXCC credit.   These contacts 
are totally by computer, the signal levels being well  below audible 
to-the-ear as much as -26 or so dB.
 
Would (or should) 160 meter contacts made by similar WSJT mode count for  
DXCC?
 
73,  Bill (W0WOI)


---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 

unsubscribe dx-chat

or 

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---

RE: [DX-CHAT] Just curious ....

2009-12-05 Thread Ron Notarius W3WN
 
WSJT is a digital mode.

If you are willing to accept a QSO on a digital mode that is present, but so
weak as to be inaudible to the human ear, then I don’t think the band in
question is a concern.

So by extension, if WSJT is accepted as a digital mode for DXCC credit on 6
meters, one would think it is also acceptable on other bands as well.

IMHO.

73, ron w3wn


From: kf...@njdxa.org [mailto:kf...@njdxa.org] On Behalf Of w0...@aol.com
Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 10:54 AM
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org; d...@arrl.org
Subject: [DX-CHAT] Just curious 

There is a small, but enthusiastic, group of 50 mHz operators using the WSJT
mode for no hear them EME QSOs and DXCC credit.  These contacts are
totally by computer, the signal levels being well below audible
to-the-ear as much as -26 or so dB.
 
Would (or should) 160 meter contacts made by similar WSJT mode count for
DXCC?
 
73,  Bill (W0WOI)



---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 

unsubscribe dx-chat

or 

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---