Re: [DX-CHAT] Dissed by Infoworld?......and QRM.....

2008-12-30 Thread DAVE WHITE
Hi all

On the QRM front, I've noticed a huge increase in RF noise from items
like Christmas lights this year.  Someone a couple of street away put
some twinkling LED lights in his garden, purchased from Tesco (a large
supermarket chain here in the UK).  These fill 160 and 80m with a
rasping noise over S9 and fill 20m with the same s9plus noise beaming
in that direction.  Clearly the wire to the lamps works like an
antenna, transmitting diode hash and rubbish from the switched mode
supply.  Needless to say, they're cheap Chinese trash from the Ping
Pong Poo Electrics Company (or whoever).  

Electrical gear that is sold in the EU is supposed to be tested and CE marked 
as compliant with standards, but enforcement of this is non-existent.  Even big 
companies like BT (British Temecom) falsely and fraudulently stamp CE on 
their home networking devices which are staggeringly non-compliant with RFI 
standards.

Anyway, this next bit is hilarious.  I got this reply to my message laughing at 
IBM, presumably from someone on the DX-CHAT group.

It's anonymous and comes from a non-existent email address.  I wonder if this 
is the mindset of the spineless little people who cause deliberate and 
anonymous QRM to dxpeditions:

QUOTE


From: 

tufts68...@mypacks.net tufts68...@mypacks.net


You arrogant bastard...

P.S.  I've worked in IT for 45 years, and fired dozens of arrogant a- 
like you.
END-QUOTE   

(bad language deleted by me)

I just love it when the reptiles come out from under their stones, don't you?  
Wouldn't you have thought he'd at least have the courage to put his name?  Now 
you know who was probably sending a carrier and dits all day over BS7H.  

Happy New Year and Good DX to you all!

OILy


--- On Mon, 29/12/08, DAVE WHITE mausop...@btinternet.com wrote:
From: DAVE WHITE mausop...@btinternet.com
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Dissed by Infoworld?
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org, wn3...@verizon.net
Cc: w1...@arrl.org
Date: Monday, 29 December, 2008, 11:05 PM

Oh, so notching is a new development, eh?  Well it probably is if you're a 
dullard who works for a bunch of buffoons like IBM!

Maybe if Ray Blair talked the the ham radio operators (who amazingly still have 
clout) he'd find that we amazingly still have more knowledge and intelligence 
than monkeys in blue suits like him

cheers

Dave G0OIL

(PS I work in IT.  It's always my pleasure to fire IBM consultants off site.  
And EDS.  And Accenture. And Tata...)

--- On Mon, 29/12/08, Ron Notarius W3WN wn3...@verizon.net wrote:
From: Ron Notarius W3WN wn3...@verizon.net
Subject: [DX-CHAT] Dissed by
 Infoworld?
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Cc: w1...@arrl.org
Date: Monday, 29 December, 2008, 7:59 PM

Nice little article on Infoworld's site today, about the 10 most under-reported 
tech stories of 2008.

Of interest to us is #6:  BPL is Back from the Dead  (see 
http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/12/29/53FE-tech-underreported-powerline_1.html
 )

Of note in the article is this paragraph:  
 
And another recent innovation, called notching, lets the chips switch 
frequencies when meeting interference. This upgrade should quiet the fears of 
ham radio operators (who amazingly enough have still have significant clout) 
and others that BPL will cause problems for various radio services, says Ray 
Blair, IBM's head of advanced networking. 

Who amazingly enough have still have significant clout ???

Never mind the bad English (don't they employ editors anymore?  or proof 
readers?).  I'm not sure if we
 should take that as an insult or a compliment.  What do you think?

73


---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 

unsubscribe dx-chat

or 

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---



---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 

unsubscribe dx-chat

or 

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---


---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 

unsubscribe dx-chat

or 

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---


Re: [DX-CHAT] Dissed by Infoworld?......and QRM.....

2008-12-30 Thread Zack Widup
I still contend that IBM and others have no real RF engineers working for
them. None of them seem to understand radio-frequency interference or
near-channel effects on things such as noise floor.

We studied all of that when I was in college in 1974 studying RF
engineering. It's not new data, just neglected. And of course means extra
cost to limit the RF noise.

73, Zack W9SZ


On 12/30/08, DAVE WHITE mausop...@btinternet.com wrote:

  Hi all

 On the QRM front, I've noticed a huge increase in RF noise from items like
 Christmas lights this year.  Someone a couple of street away put some
 twinkling LED lights in his garden, purchased from Tesco (a large
 supermarket chain here in the UK).  These fill 160 and 80m with a rasping
 noise over S9 and fill 20m with the same s9plus noise beaming in that
 direction.  Clearly the wire to the lamps works like an antenna,
 transmitting diode hash and rubbish from the switched mode supply.  Needless
 to say, they're cheap Chinese trash from the Ping Pong Poo Electrics Company
 (or whoever).

 Electrical gear that is sold in the EU is supposed to be tested and CE
 marked as compliant with standards, but enforcement of this is
 non-existent.  Even big companies like BT (British Temecom) falsely and
 fraudulently stamp CE on their home networking devices which are
 staggeringly non-compliant with RFI standards.

 Anyway, this next bit is hilarious.  I got this reply to my message
 laughing at IBM, presumably from someone on the DX-CHAT group.

 It's anonymous and comes from a non-existent email address.  I wonder if
 this is the mindset of the spineless little people who cause deliberate and
 anonymous QRM to dxpeditions:

 QUOTE
  From:
  tufts68...@mypacks.net tufts68...@mypacks.net

 http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylt=AsPh9P5rGh.45Dt3zuGjyFLDAL4X/SIG=1u9lqkca4/**http%3A//address.mail.yahoo.com/yab%3Fv=YM%26A=m%26simp=1%26e=tufts68116%2540mypacks.net%26fn=tufts68116%2540mypacks.net%26.done=http%253A%252F%252Fuk.mc863.mail.yahoo.com%252Fmc%252FshowMessage%253Ffid%253DInbox%2526sort%253Ddate%2526order%253Ddown%2526startMid%253D0%2526.rand%253D992080083%2526da%253D0%2526midIndex%253D6%2526mid%253D1_499_AHS8ktkAAIt%25252BSVmHAQBPag4Eqs4%2526prevMid%253D1_200508_ABS8ktkAAEDWSVm4TwfeETK5iW0%2526nextMid%253D1_200174_AHK8ktkAAF2mSVm4QQ8A6H5zhuc%2526m%253D1_201993_AHG8ktkAAPc%25252FSVniow5uGlodvdM%252C1_201592_AG%25252B8ktkAAT2KSVnTtAQdulrVV38%252C1_201225_AHC8ktkAAAd6SVnHPA1aVWMMeso%252C1_200866_AHG8ktkAAEFySVm4XwCy1G%25252FP1rU%252C1_200508_ABS8ktkAAEDWSVm4TwfeETK5iW0%252C1_499_AHS8ktkAAIt%25252BSVmHAQBPag4Eqs4%252C1_200174_AHK8ktkAAF2mSVm4QQ8A6H5zhuc%252C1_199831_AHW8ktkAAAphSVm4MwxZIgndygY%252C1_199352_ABO8ktkAAM5xSVm4HwGnVCdHbKM%252C1_8%0A33_AHS8ktkAAGtuSVlaZQF7nUIrZ%25252B0%252C1_1190_AHS8ktkAAGwUSVlaWwyRPBdfwH0%252C

 You arrogant bastard...

 P.S.  I've worked in IT for 45 years, and fired dozens of arrogant
 a- like you.
 END-QUOTE

 (bad language deleted by me)

 I just love it when the reptiles come out from under their stones, don't
 you?  Wouldn't you have thought he'd at least have the courage to put his
 name?  Now you know who was probably sending a carrier and dits all day over
 BS7H.

 Happy New Year and Good DX to you all!

 OILy


 --- On *Mon, 29/12/08, DAVE WHITE mausop...@btinternet.com* wrote:

 From: DAVE WHITE mausop...@btinternet.com
 Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Dissed by Infoworld?
 To: dx-chat@njdxa.org, wn3...@verizon.net
 Cc: w1...@arrl.org
 Date: Monday, 29 December, 2008, 11:05 PM

 Oh, so notching is a new development, eh?  Well it probably is if you're
 a dullard who works for a bunch of buffoons like IBM!

 Maybe if Ray Blair talked the the ham radio operators (who amazingly still
 have clout) he'd find that we amazingly still have more knowledge and
 intelligence than monkeys in blue suits like him

 cheers

 Dave G0OIL

 (PS I work in IT.  It's always my pleasure to fire IBM consultants off
 site.  And EDS.  And Accenture. And Tata...)

 --- On *Mon, 29/12/08, Ron Notarius W3WN wn3...@verizon.net* wrote:

 From: Ron Notarius W3WN wn3...@verizon.net
 Subject: [DX-CHAT] Dissed by Infoworld?
 To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
 Cc: w1...@arrl.org
 Date: Monday, 29 December, 2008, 7:59 PM

 Nice little article on Infoworld's site today, about the 10 most
 under-reported tech stories of 2008.

 Of interest to us is #6: BPL is Back from the Dead (see
 http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/12/29/53FE-tech-underreported-powerline_1.html)

 Of note in the article is this paragraph:

 And another recent innovation, called notching, lets the chips switch
 frequencies when meeting interference. This upgrade should quiet the fears
 of ham radio operators (who amazingly enough have still have significant
 clout) and others that BPL will cause problems for various radio services,
 says Ray Blair, IBM's head of advanced networking. 

 Who amazingly enough have still have significant clout ???

 Never mind the bad English (don't they employ editors anymore? or proof

Re: [DX-CHAT] Dissed by Infoworld?......and QRM.....

2008-12-30 Thread DAVE WHITE
Hi Zack

Sadly I fear that you're correct in every respect.  In line with the old maxim 
In the land of the blind the one-eyed man is king experience shows that 
people who are 99 percent ignorant but talk a good game market themselves as 
experts to those who are 100 percent ignorant.  And of course the latter 
believe them.  Not everyone in this world acts with honesty and integrity, let 
alone with knowledge.

cheers

Dave G0OIL

--- On Tue, 30/12/08, Zack Widup w9sz.z...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Zack Widup w9sz.z...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Dissed by Infoworld?..and QRM.
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Date: Tuesday, 30 December, 2008, 3:33 PM


I still contend that IBM and others have no real RF engineers working
for them. None of them seem to understand radio-frequency interference
or near-channel effects on things such as noise floor.  



We studied all of that when I was in college in 1974 studying RF
engineering. It's not new data, just neglected. And of course means
extra cost to limit the RF noise.



73, Zack W9SZ



 
On 12/30/08, DAVE WHITE mausop...@btinternet.com wrote:



Hi all

On the QRM front, I've noticed a huge increase in RF noise from items
like Christmas lights this year.  Someone a couple of street away put
some twinkling LED lights in his garden, purchased from Tesco (a large
supermarket chain here in the UK).  These fill 160 and 80m with a
rasping noise over S9 and fill 20m with the same s9plus noise beaming
in that direction.  Clearly the wire to the lamps works like an
antenna, transmitting diode hash and rubbish from the switched mode
supply.  Needless to say, they're cheap Chinese trash from the Ping
Pong Poo Electrics Company (or whoever).  

Electrical
gear that is sold in the EU is supposed to be tested and CE marked as
compliant with standards, but enforcement of this is
non-existent.  Even big companies like BT (British Temecom)
falsely and fraudulently stamp CE on their home networking devices
which are staggeringly non-compliant with RFI standards.

Anyway,
this next bit is hilarious.  I got this reply to my message
laughing at IBM, presumably from someone on the DX-CHAT group.

It's
anonymous and comes from a non-existent email address.  I wonder
if this is the mindset of the spineless little people who cause
deliberate and anonymous QRM to dxpeditions:

QUOTE


From: 

tufts68...@mypacks.net tufts68...@mypacks.net




You arrogant bastard...

P.S.  I've worked in IT for 45 years, and fired dozens of arrogant a- 
like you.
END-QUOTE   

(bad language deleted by me)



I
just love it when the reptiles come out from under their stones, don't
you?  Wouldn't you have thought he'd at least have the courage to
put his name?  Now you know who was probably sending a carrier and
dits all day over BS7H.  

Happy New Year and Good DX to you all!

OILy


--- On Mon, 29/12/08, DAVE WHITE mausop...@btinternet.com wrote:


From: DAVE WHITE mausop...@btinternet.com


Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Dissed by Infoworld?
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org, wn3...@verizon.net


Cc: w1...@arrl.org
Date: Monday, 29 December,
 2008, 11:05 PM



Oh,
so notching is a new development, eh?  Well it probably is if
you're a dullard who works for a bunch of buffoons like IBM!

Maybe if Ray Blair talked the the ham radio operators (who amazingly still have 
clout) he'd find that we amazingly still have more knowledge and intelligence 
than monkeys in blue suits like him



cheers

Dave G0OIL

(PS
I work in IT.  It's always my pleasure to fire IBM consultants off
site.  And EDS.  And Accenture. And Tata...)

--- On Mon, 29/12/08, Ron
 Notarius W3WN wn3...@verizon.net wrote:


From: Ron Notarius W3WN wn3...@verizon.net
Subject: [DX-CHAT] Dissed by
 Infoworld?
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Cc: w1...@arrl.org


Date: Monday, 29 December, 2008, 7:59 PM

Nice little article on Infoworld's site today, about the 10 most under-reported 
tech stories of 2008.

Of interest to us is #6:  BPL is Back from the Dead  (see 
http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/12/29/53FE-tech-underreported-powerline_1.html
 )



Of note in the article is this paragraph:  
 
And
another recent innovation, called notching, lets the chips switch
frequencies when meeting interference. This upgrade should quiet the
fears of ham radio operators (who amazingly enough have still have
significant clout) and others that BPL will cause problems for various
radio services, says Ray Blair, IBM's head of advanced networking. 

Who amazingly enough have still have significant clout ???

Never mind the bad English (don't they employ editors anymore?  or proof 
readers?).  I'm not sure if we
 should take that as an insult or a compliment.  What do you think?

73


---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 



In the message body put either 

unsubscribe dx-chat

Re: [DX-CHAT] Dissed by Infoworld?......and QRM.....

2008-12-30 Thread Zack Widup
Oh yeah.  In Latin, the phrase is inter caecos regnat luscus.
:-)

73, Zack W9SZ

On 12/30/08, DAVE WHITE mausop...@btinternet.com wrote:

 Hi Zack

 Sadly I fear that you're correct in every respect.  In line with the old
 maxim In the land of the blind the one-eyed man is king experience shows
 that people who are 99 percent ignorant but talk a good game market
 themselves as experts to those who are 100 percent ignorant.  And of course
 the latter believe them.  Not everyone in this world acts with honesty and
 integrity, let alone with knowledge.

 cheers

 Dave G0OIL

 --- On *Tue, 30/12/08, Zack Widup w9sz.z...@gmail.com* wrote:

 From: Zack Widup w9sz.z...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Dissed by Infoworld?..and QRM.
 To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
 Date: Tuesday, 30 December, 2008, 3:33 PM


 I still contend that IBM and others have no real RF engineers working for
 them. None of them seem to understand radio-frequency interference or
 near-channel effects on things such as noise floor.

 We studied all of that when I was in college in 1974 studying RF
 engineering. It's not new data, just neglected. And of course means extra
 cost to limit the RF noise.

 73, Zack W9SZ


 On 12/30/08, DAVE WHITE mausop...@btinternet.com wrote:

  Hi all

 On the QRM front, I've noticed a huge increase in RF noise from items like
 Christmas lights this year.  Someone a couple of street away put some
 twinkling LED lights in his garden, purchased from Tesco (a large
 supermarket chain here in the UK).  These fill 160 and 80m with a rasping
 noise over S9 and fill 20m with the same s9plus noise beaming in that
 direction.  Clearly the wire to the lamps works like an antenna,
 transmitting diode hash and rubbish from the switched mode supply.  Needless
 to say, they're cheap Chinese trash from the Ping Pong Poo Electrics Company
 (or whoever).

 Electrical gear that is sold in the EU is supposed to be tested and CE
 marked as compliant with standards, but enforcement of this is
 non-existent.  Even big companies like BT (British Temecom) falsely and
 fraudulently stamp CE on their home networking devices which are
 staggeringly non-compliant with RFI standards.

 Anyway, this next bit is hilarious.  I got this reply to my message
 laughing at IBM, presumably from someone on the DX-CHAT group.

 It's anonymous and comes from a non-existent email address.  I wonder if
 this is the mindset of the spineless little people who cause deliberate and
 anonymous QRM to dxpeditions:

 QUOTE
  From:
  tufts68...@mypacks.net tufts68...@mypacks.net

 http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylt=AsPh9P5rGh.45Dt3zuGjyFLDAL4X/SIG=1u9lqkca4/**http%3A//address.mail.yahoo.com/yab%3Fv=YM%26A=m%26simp=1%26e=tufts68116%2540mypacks.net%26fn=tufts68116%2540mypacks.net%26.done=http%253A%252F%252Fuk.mc863.mail.yahoo.com%252Fmc%252FshowMessage%253Ffid%253DInbox%2526sort%253Ddate%2526order%253Ddown%2526startMid%253D0%2526.rand%253D992080083%2526da%253D0%2526midIndex%253D6%2526mid%253D1_499_AHS8ktkAAIt%25252BSVmHAQBPag4Eqs4%2526prevMid%253D1_200508_ABS8ktkAAEDWSVm4TwfeETK5iW0%2526nextMid%253D1_200174_AHK8ktkAAF2mSVm4QQ8A6H5zhuc%2526m%253D1_201993_AHG8ktkAAPc%25252FSVniow5uGlodvdM%252C1_201592_AG%25252B8ktkAAT2KSVnTtAQdulrVV38%252C1_201225_AHC8ktkAAAd6SVnHPA1aVWMMeso%252C1_200866_AHG8ktkAAEFySVm4XwCy1G%25252FP1rU%252C1_200508_ABS8ktkAAEDWSVm4TwfeETK5iW0%252C1_499_AHS8ktkAAIt%25252BSVmHAQBPag4Eqs4%252C1_200174_AHK8ktkAAF2mSVm4QQ8A6H5zhuc%252C1_199831_AHW8ktkAAAphSVm4MwxZIgndygY%252C1_199352_ABO8ktkAAM5xSVm4HwGnVCdHbKM%252C1_8%0A%0A33_AHS8ktkAAGtuSVlaZQF7nUIrZ%25252B0%252C1_1190_AHS8ktkAAGwUSVlaWwyRPBdfwH0%252C

 You arrogant bastard...

 P.S.  I've worked in IT for 45 years, and fired dozens of arrogant
 a- like you.
 END-QUOTE

 (bad language deleted by me)

 I just love it when the reptiles come out from under their stones, don't
 you?  Wouldn't you have thought he'd at least have the courage to put his
 name?  Now you know who was probably sending a carrier and dits all day over
 BS7H.

 Happy New Year and Good DX to you all!

 OILy


 --- On *Mon, 29/12/08, DAVE WHITE mausop...@btinternet.com* wrote:

 From: DAVE WHITE mausop...@btinternet.com
 Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Dissed by Infoworld?
 To: dx-chat@njdxa.org, wn3...@verizon.net
 Cc: w1...@arrl.org
 Date: Monday, 29 December, 2008, 11:05 PM

 Oh, so notching is a new development, eh?  Well it probably is if you're
 a dullard who works for a bunch of buffoons like IBM!

 Maybe if Ray Blair talked the the ham radio operators (who amazingly
 still have clout) he'd find that we amazingly still have more knowledge
 and intelligence than monkeys in blue suits like him

 cheers

 Dave G0OIL

 (PS I work in IT.  It's always my pleasure to fire IBM consultants off
 site.  And EDS.  And Accenture. And Tata...)

 --- On *Mon, 29/12/08, Ron Notarius W3WN wn3...@verizon.net* wrote:

 From: Ron Notarius W3WN wn3...@verizon.net
 Subject: [DX-CHAT] Dissed by Infoworld?
 To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
 Cc: w1

[DX-CHAT] Dissed by Infoworld?

2008-12-29 Thread Ron Notarius W3WN
Nice little article on Infoworld's site today, about the 10 most under-reported tech stories of 2008.Of interest to us is #6:  BPL is Back from the Dead  (see http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/12/29/53FE-tech-underreported-powerline_1.html )Of note in the article is this paragraph:   "And another recent innovation, called notching, lets the chips switch frequencies when meeting interference. This upgrade should quiet the fears of ham radio operators (who amazingly enough have still have significant clout) and others that BPL will cause problems for various radio services, says Ray Blair, IBM's head of advanced networking. ""Who amazingly enough have still have significant clout" ???Never mind the bad English (don't they employ editors anymore?  or proof readers?).  I'm not sure if we should take that as an insult or a compliment.  What do you think?73

---To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message toimail...@njdxa.org In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chator subscribe dx-chatThis is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org---



Re: [DX-CHAT] Dissed by Infoworld?

2008-12-29 Thread DAVE WHITE
Oh, so notching is a new development, eh?  Well it probably is if you're a 
dullard who works for a bunch of buffoons like IBM!

Maybe if Ray Blair talked the the ham radio operators (who amazingly still have 
clout) he'd find that we amazingly still have more knowledge and intelligence 
than monkeys in blue suits like him

cheers

Dave G0OIL

(PS I work in IT.  It's always my pleasure to fire IBM consultants off site.  
And EDS.  And Accenture. And Tata...)

--- On Mon, 29/12/08, Ron Notarius W3WN wn3...@verizon.net wrote:
From: Ron Notarius W3WN wn3...@verizon.net
Subject: [DX-CHAT] Dissed by Infoworld?
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Cc: w1...@arrl.org
Date: Monday, 29 December, 2008, 7:59 PM

Nice little article on Infoworld's site today, about the 10 most under-reported 
tech stories of 2008.

Of interest to us is #6:  BPL is Back from the Dead  (see 
http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/12/29/53FE-tech-underreported-powerline_1.html
 )

Of note in the article is this paragraph:  
 
And another recent innovation, called notching, lets the chips switch 
frequencies when meeting interference. This upgrade should quiet the fears of 
ham radio operators (who amazingly enough have still have significant clout) 
and others that BPL will cause problems for various radio services, says Ray 
Blair, IBM's head of advanced networking. 

Who amazingly enough have still have significant clout ???

Never mind the bad English (don't they employ editors anymore?  or proof 
readers?).  I'm not sure if we should take that as an insult or a compliment.  
What do you think?

73


---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 

unsubscribe dx-chat

or 

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---



---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 

unsubscribe dx-chat

or 

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---