Re: [DX-CHAT] How Would You Respond

2004-04-05 Thread Zack Widup
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 In a message dated 4/5/2004 8:10:07 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Another one I use a lot is SN (I copy or I understand). I don't 
 think that one is on the test, either
   I always thought this meant I repeat --- actually IR run together.  
 
  Tom,  W6HT
 

No, that's I I (didit didit).  I found the didididahdit listed on 
AC6V's website as VE = Understand.  I guess you could call it VE, 
SN or IR.  I always called it SN.

But I've been using it for over 35 years.

73, Zack W9SZ

Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat

To post a message, DX related items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA 
http://njdxa.org



Re: [DX-CHAT] How Would You Respond ??

2004-04-04 Thread Paul Playford
During my working life I figured I spent 90% of my time learning, 90% of my
time teaching, and 10% of my time doing.

You have a good start at the teaching part - stay with it.

de Paul, W8AEF

---
ZF2TA  ZF2JI FO8DX  FO0PLA  8Q7AA  XZ0A
---

- Original Message - 
From: Larry, K4WLS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [DX-Chat] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 2:15 AM
Subject: [DX-CHAT] How Would You Respond ??


 Last week I had a CW QSO with relatively new ham (3 Yrs on
 air) on 7012 KHz. I had to slow down Loigikey to 4 WPM for
 him to copy. He gave me a 597 report. Asked him to AS while
 I checked my CW tone. He did not know what that meant  - so
 told him to STANBY. Switched on another RX - my TS-870
 sig was T9. Told him my CW sig was T9 - he didn't know
 what T9 meant either. Gave that up and we went throught the
 rest of the pleasantries of a QSO: rig, WX, age, occupation, etc.

 Before finishing QSO, he asked me to slow down speed again
 (he did not use QRS). I set Logikeyer to 3 WPM and put extra
 long spaces between characters.

 Before signing, I recommended that he might spend some more
 time in the General portion of band. Told him a lot of new CW
 guys hung out around 7040 KHz, he could get improve his
 operating skills, his code speed, and probably avoid the risk
 of getting his feelings hurt by a an ole crusty Extra (I still am
 to some extent). I could tell he took a little offense to this
 statement.

 Friday, I got a QSL card from him: On the QSL my report was
 listed as 459, and the Freq was 7820 Mhz.

 So how would you respond to this QSL ???

 (1) Throw it in the trashcan.

 (2)  Return QSL and tell him you would be glad to QSL if he sent
another QSL with the correct QSO info.

 (3)  Send him a QSL for a QSO on 7820 MHz and put his RST
as 123 on QSL.

 Just sorta curious what you would honestly do in this situation.

 C'mon now guys be honest !! TKS,  Larry   K4WLS


Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat

To post a message, DX related items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA 
http://njdxa.org



Re: [DX-CHAT] How Would You Respond ??

2004-04-04 Thread Zack Widup

On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, Larry,  K4WLS wrote:

 Last week I had a CW QSO with relatively new ham (3 Yrs on
 air) on 7012 KHz. I had to slow down Loigikey to 4 WPM for
 him to copy. He gave me a 597 report. Asked him to AS while
 I checked my CW tone. He did not know what that meant  - so
 told him to STANBY. Switched on another RX - my TS-870
 sig was T9. Told him my CW sig was T9 - he didn't know
 what T9 meant either. Gave that up and we went throught the
 rest of the pleasantries of a QSO: rig, WX, age, occupation, etc.
 
 Before finishing QSO, he asked me to slow down speed again
 (he did not use QRS). I set Logikeyer to 3 WPM and put extra
 long spaces between characters.
 
 Before signing, I recommended that he might spend some more
 time in the General portion of band. Told him a lot of new CW
 guys hung out around 7040 KHz, he could get improve his
 operating skills, his code speed, and probably avoid the risk
 of getting his feelings hurt by a an ole crusty Extra (I still am
 to some extent). I could tell he took a little offense to this
 statement.
 
 Friday, I got a QSL card from him: On the QSL my report was
 listed as 459, and the Freq was 7820 Mhz.
 
 So how would you respond to this QSL ???
 
 (1) Throw it in the trashcan.
 
 (2)  Return QSL and tell him you would be glad to QSL if he sent
another QSL with the correct QSO info.
 
 (3)  Send him a QSL for a QSO on 7820 MHz and put his RST
as 123 on QSL.
 
 Just sorta curious what you would honestly do in this situation.
 
 C'mon now guys be honest !! TKS,  Larry   K4WLS
 

Probably the most helpful would be #2.  You might also want to include a 
note telling him that some of us took YEARS of operating to acquire the 
skills, knowledge and terminology needed to carry out knowledgeable QSO's 
on CW.  He really in effect doesn't have CW skills beyond the old Novice 
license I got in 1967.  It took me a while to learn what de, es, 
wx, pse and other abbreviations meant when sent on CW. I don't think 
these are on the exam or in the question pool.  :-)

Good thing it wasn't a P5 station.

73, Zack W9SZ


Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat

To post a message, DX related items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA 
http://njdxa.org



[DX-CHAT] How Would You Respond ??

2004-04-04 Thread Ron St.Laurent ND5S
Hi Larry,

Not knowing anything else about the guy I would cut him some slack and send
the card with a 7.0 MHZ frequency.  At least he is trying CW which is more
than can be said for a lot of folks out there.  He even QSLed which is
another sign that his heart is in the right place.  If he is nervous about
his code, which he may be, he might not have figured the T to be the T
of RST.

As far as his operating frequency, it's just a fact (like it or not) that 5
WPM is the requirement for Extra now.  As long as he is licensed for that
segment he has a right to be there.

The transposition of numbers could even be dilexia.

Best 73,

Ron ND5S

Visit my Website at:
www.qsl.net/nd5s
 
- Original Message - 
From: Larry, K4WLS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [DX-Chat] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2004 10:15 PM
Subject: [DX-CHAT] How Would You Respond ??


 Last week I had a CW QSO with relatively new ham (3 Yrs on
 air) on 7012 KHz. I had to slow down Loigikey to 4 WPM for
 him to copy. He gave me a 597 report. Asked him to AS while
 I checked my CW tone. He did not know what that meant  - so
 told him to STANBY. Switched on another RX - my TS-870
 sig was T9. Told him my CW sig was T9 - he didn't know
 what T9 meant either. Gave that up and we went throught the
 rest of the pleasantries of a QSO: rig, WX, age, occupation, etc.
 
 Before finishing QSO, he asked me to slow down speed again
 (he did not use QRS). I set Logikeyer to 3 WPM and put extra
 long spaces between characters.
 
 Before signing, I recommended that he might spend some more
 time in the General portion of band. Told him a lot of new CW
 guys hung out around 7040 KHz, he could get improve his
 operating skills, his code speed, and probably avoid the risk
 of getting his feelings hurt by a an ole crusty Extra (I still am
 to some extent). I could tell he took a little offense to this
 statement.
 
 Friday, I got a QSL card from him: On the QSL my report was
 listed as 459, and the Freq was 7820 Mhz.
 
 So how would you respond to this QSL ???
 
 (1) Throw it in the trashcan.
 
 (2)  Return QSL and tell him you would be glad to QSL if he sent
another QSL with the correct QSO info.
 
 (3)  Send him a QSL for a QSO on 7820 MHz and put his RST
as 123 on QSL.
 
 Just sorta curious what you would honestly do in this situation.
 
 C'mon now guys be honest !! TKS,  Larry   K4WLS
 
 
 Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
 http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
 
 To post a message, DX related items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA 
 http://njdxa.org
 
 

Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat

To post a message, DX related items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA 
http://njdxa.org