[DX-NEWS] ARLP010 Propagation de K7RA

2006-03-10 Thread W1AW
SB PROP @ ARL $ARLP010
ARLP010 Propagation de K7RA

ZCZC AP10
QST de W1AW  
Propagation Forecast Bulletin 10  ARLP010
From Tad Cook, K7RA
Seattle, WA  March 10, 2006
To all radio amateurs 

SB PROP ARL ARLP010
ARLP010 Propagation de K7RA

A big news story this week (big to us, anyway) generated more email
than I've ever received.  If you were one of the kind folks who sent
in an alert about a new prediction for sunspot cycle 24, I'm sorry
that I couldn't get back to everyone.

A new computer model of solar dynamics produced by scientists at the
National Center for Atmospheric Research predicts the next solar
cycle to begin a bit later than earlier believed, but to rise much
higher, perhaps 30-50% higher than the current solar cycle just
ending.  Their model claims to predict cycles 16-23 using earlier
data with 97% accuracy.  I would love to see some dissenting
scientific opinion, but of course in my heart I long for another
cycle 19 of the 1950s, one that I missed.  50% higher would just
about get us there!

You can read about the new prediction model at these sites: 
http://www.newscientistspace.com/article.ns?id=dn8814 
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=19189  
http://www.universetoday.com/am/publish/30_50_solar_cycle.html  
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/261963_solar07.html  
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=19190  
http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/space/03/07/solar.storm.ap/index.html  
http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=105844.  
An article with a photo of Dr. Dikpati and members of her team is
here: http://www.ucar.edu/news/releases/2006/sunspot.shtml.

Also check out this article from NASA, which claims that the solar
minimum is already here, or at least the beginning of it:
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2006/06mar_solarminimum.htm.

Regarding current propagation, solar activity is still low, with
many days of zero sunspots recently, and even more ahead.  The
vernal equinox is only a couple of weeks away.  This is a good time
for HF propagation, even with few sunspots, as the southern and
northern hemispheres are equally bathed in the sun's radiation.  
Friday, March 10 could have unsettled to active geomagnetic
conditions, with unsettled conditions on Saturday, quiet to
unsettled on Sunday, and quiet on Monday, March 13.

Bob Poortinga, K9SQL of Bloomington, Indiana wrote in about his
experience on 15 meters last week in the ARRL International DX SSB
Contest.  He ran 100 watts into a wire antenna (he didn't say if it
was a dipole, a rhombic, or a Sterba curtain, but let's assume it
was a simple antenna) and worked 44 countries.  Bob wrote:
''Highlights included 2 JAs (heard 2 others), Tonga, Ascension
Island, and 3 KH6s.  Also heard, but did not work, VK6NS and a ZL1
station.  Had lots of QSOs to South America, mostly Argentina and
Brazil.  The Pacific opening lasted about two hours, occurring about
2130-2330 UTC Sunday.  The 3 KH6s were worked within 15 minutes of
each other and did not hear again''.

Bob also likes the BeaconSee software for monitoring NCDXF/IARU
beacons.  Bob says ''I can't say enough about this program''.  Check
it out for yourself at http://www.coaa.co.uk/beaconsee.htm.

Mark Schreiner, NK8Q of Allentown, Pennsylvania wrote in about how
much fun he is having at the bottom of the cycle running QRP, and
how great the lower part of the HF spectrum is with so little solar
activity.  He writes, ''About 1-1/2 hours after local sunrise I heard
3D2NB on 40m on 3/3/06 and once I figured out the QSX I worked him
within a matter of a couple of calls.  I was amazed to hear a
station at such great distance so late after local sunrise!  I had
worked a Fiji Islands station who was barely copyable by me (so I
can't imagine how my signal was for him unless his antenna was
something special) early last summer at about 5 AM during the peak
of grayline, just before my local sunrise, but to work this station
so late after sunrise and with at least an S5 to S7 signal strength
at my end, I thought was absolutely amazing!

And finally, Warren Ziegler, K2ORS holds broadcaster Jean Shepard's
old call.  Warren experiments with longwave transmissions on 137.8
KHz.  Look at the cool stone tower where he operates his station:
http://www.w4dex.com/wd2xgj.htm.

Thanks again to the multitude of hams who wrote in about the story
on the next solar cycle, including AI2Q, KB9X, W9DGI, K5SWW, KA7OVQ,
WF0P, K9SQL, K2ORS, N5FPW, W5TB, NG1I, K0YQ, W8XKW, NK8Q, WD4DUG,
W6AH, K0HZI, AD5FD, W8UI, KC5PJW, K7VV, N7NVP, K0AMZ, N0AX and many
others.

If you would like to make a comment or have a tip for our readers,
email the author at, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For more information concerning radio propagation and an explanation
of the numbers used in this bulletin see the ARRL Technical
Information Service propagation page at,
http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/propagation.html.  An archive of past
propagation bulletins is found at, http://www.arrl.org/w1aw/prop/.

Sunspot numbers for March 

[DX-NEWS] NASA Issues solar storm warning

2006-03-10 Thread Tom Anderson

From the NASA Web page--Tom, WW5L

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2006/10mar_stormwarning.htm?list801221


March 10, 2006: It's official: Solar minimum has arrived. Sunspots have 
all but vanished. Solar flares are nonexistent. The sun is utterly quiet.


Like the quiet before a storm.

This week researchers announced that a storm is coming--the most intense 
solar maximum in fifty years. The prediction comes from a team led by 
Mausumi Dikpati of the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). 
The next sunspot cycle will be 30% to 50% stronger than the previous 
one, she says. If correct, the years ahead could produce a burst of 
solar activity second only to the historic Solar Max of 1958.


see caption 
http://www-istp.gsfc.nasa.gov/istp/outreach/auroras.htmlThat was a 
solar maximum. The Space Age was just beginning: Sputnik was launched in 
Oct. 1957 and Explorer 1 (the first US satellite) in Jan. 1958. In 1958 
you couldn't tell that a solar storm was underway by looking at the bars 
on your cell phone; cell phones didn't exist. Even so, people knew 
something big was happening when Northern Lights were sighted three 
times in Mexico. A similar maximum now would be noticed by its effect on 
cell phones, GPS, weather satellites and many other modern technologies.


Right: Intense auroras over Fairbanks, Alaska, in 1958. [More 
http://www-istp.gsfc.nasa.gov/istp/outreach/auroras.html]


Dikpati's prediction is unprecedented. In nearly-two centuries since the 
11-year sunspot cycle was discovered, scientists have struggled to 
predict the size of future maximaand failed. Solar maxima can be 
intense, as in 1958, or barely detectable, as in 1805, obeying no 
obvious pattern.


The key to the mystery, Dikpati realized years ago, is a conveyor belt 
on the sun.


We have something similar here on Earththe Great Ocean Conveyor Belt, 
popularized in the sci-fi movie The Day After Tomorrow. It is a network 
of currents that carry water and heat from ocean to ocean--see the 
diagram below. In the movie, the Conveyor Belt stopped and threw the 
world's weather into chaos.


see caption http://seis.natsci.csulb.edu/rbehl/ConvBelt.htm
Above: Earth's Great Ocean Conveyor Belt. [More 
http://seis.natsci.csulb.edu/rbehl/ConvBelt.htm]


The sun's conveyor belt is a current, not of water, but of 
electrically-conducting gas. It flows in a loop from the sun's equator 
to the poles and back again. Just as the Great Ocean Conveyor Belt 
controls weather on Earth, this solar conveyor belt controls weather on 
the sun. Specifically, it controls the sunspot cycle.


Solar physicist David Hathaway of the National Space Science  
Technology Center (NSSTC) explains: First, remember what sunspots 
are--tangled knots of magnetism generated by the sun's inner dynamo. A 
typical sunspot exists for just a few weeks. Then it decays, leaving 
behind a 'corpse' of weak magnetic fields.


Enter the conveyor belt.

see caption 
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2006/images/stormwarning/conveyorbelt.jpgThe 
top of the conveyor belt skims the surface of the sun, sweeping up the 
magnetic fields of old, dead sunspots. The 'corpses' are dragged down at 
the poles to a depth of 200,000 km where the sun's magnetic dynamo can 
amplify them. Once the corpses (magnetic knots) are reincarnated 
(amplified), they become buoyant and float back to the surface. 
Prestonew sunspots!


Right: The sun's great conveyor belt. [Larger image 
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2006/images/stormwarning/conveyorbelt.jpg]


All this happens with massive slowness. It takes about 40 years for the 
belt to complete one loop, says Hathaway. The speed varies anywhere 
from a 50-year pace (slow) to a 30-year pace (fast).


When the belt is turning fast, it means that lots of magnetic fields 
are being swept up, and that a future sunspot cycle is going to be 
intense. This is a basis for forecasting: The belt was turning fast in 
1986-1996, says Hathaway. Old magnetic fields swept up then should 
re-appear as big sunspots in 2010-2011.


Like most experts in the field, Hathaway has confidence in the conveyor 
belt model and agrees with Dikpati that the next solar maximum should be 
a doozy. But he disagrees with one point. Dikpati's forecast puts Solar 
Max at 2012. Hathaway believes it will arrive sooner, in 2010 or 2011.


History shows that big sunspot cycles 'ramp up' faster than small 
ones, he says. I expect to see the first sunspots of the next cycle 
appear in late 2006 or 2007and Solar Max to be underway by 2010 or 2011.


Who's right? Time will tell. Either way, a storm is coming.