Re: [Dx4win] Modes FT4 And JS8

2019-08-18 Thread Jim Reisert AD1C
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 3:57 PM Bud Governale wrote:

> I check marked MFSK today.
> Are my previous DX4WIN FT4 Imports now classed as FT4?
> Should I now TQSL upload  again past uploads to get LOTW FT4 mode credit?

What were the FT4 QSOs originally imported *from*?  You need to
identify those QSOs and change the Mode=MFSK, Submode=FT4 for each of
them.  Also make sure that "LoTW" is (re-)set to 'Y' and Upload Date
(next to it) is empty.  That will force DX4WIN to export those QSOs
for your next LoTW upload.

-- 
Jim Reisert AD1C, , http://www.ad1c.us
__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Dx4win] Modes FT4 And JS8

2019-08-17 Thread David Kozinn, K2DBK
I don’t believe that D4W will automatically change the older ones to properly 
reflect FT4, I think you need to re-import. It’s easy enough to check, press F8 
to do a search for mode MFSK and sub-mode FT4 (you probably don’t need the 
submode) and see if anything comes up. If not, just re-import and then do a 
LoTW export and upload.

 

 

From: Bud Governale  
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 5:57 PM
To: David Kozinn, K2DBK 
Cc: DX4WIN Reflector ; w...@arrl.net
Subject: Re: [Dx4win] Modes FT4 And JS8

 

I check marked MFSK today. 

Are my previous DX4WIN FT4 Imports now classed as FT4?

Should I now TQSL upload  again past uploads to get LOTW FT4 mode credit?

 

73,

 

Bud W3LL 

w...@arrl.net <mailto:w...@arrl.net> 

 

 

On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 3:48 PM David Kozinn, K2DBK mailto:k2...@arrl.net> > wrote:

You just need to have MFSK marked. If you're importing the ADIF from WSJT-X
it'll automatically populate correctly with MFSK in the Mode field and FT4
in the SubMode field. Otherwise, if you're entering manually you'll need to
do that yourself.

-Original Message-
From: dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net <mailto:dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net>  
mailto:dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net> > On
Behalf Of Bud Governale
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 3:17 PM
To: DX4WIN Reflector mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net> >
Subject: [Dx4win] Modes FT4 And JS8

I see version 9.05 added MFSK sub-modes FT4 and JS8

Where do I find FT4 and JS8??

I'm running version 9.06
I looked in:
File>Preferences>Station>Modes
I see FT8 as a choice (it's checked) but no FT4 or JS8.
I check marked MFSK just to be sure.

73,

Bud W3LL
w...@arrl.net.that <mailto:w...@arrl.net.that> 
__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net <mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net> 

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Dx4win] Modes FT4 And JS8

2019-08-16 Thread Bud Governale
I check marked MFSK today.
Are my previous DX4WIN FT4 Imports now classed as FT4?
Should I now TQSL upload  again past uploads to get LOTW FT4 mode credit?

73,

Bud W3LL
w...@arrl.net


On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 3:48 PM David Kozinn, K2DBK  wrote:

> You just need to have MFSK marked. If you're importing the ADIF from WSJT-X
> it'll automatically populate correctly with MFSK in the Mode field and FT4
> in the SubMode field. Otherwise, if you're entering manually you'll need to
> do that yourself.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net  On
> Behalf Of Bud Governale
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 3:17 PM
> To: DX4WIN Reflector 
> Subject: [Dx4win] Modes FT4 And JS8
>
> I see version 9.05 added MFSK sub-modes FT4 and JS8
>
> Where do I find FT4 and JS8??
>
> I'm running version 9.06
> I looked in:
> File>Preferences>Station>Modes
> I see FT8 as a choice (it's checked) but no FT4 or JS8.
> I check marked MFSK just to be sure.
>
> 73,
>
> Bud W3LL
> w...@arrl.net.that
> __
> DX4WIN mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Dx4win] Modes FT4 And JS8

2019-08-16 Thread David Kozinn, K2DBK
You just need to have MFSK marked. If you're importing the ADIF from WSJT-X
it'll automatically populate correctly with MFSK in the Mode field and FT4
in the SubMode field. Otherwise, if you're entering manually you'll need to
do that yourself.

-Original Message-
From: dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net  On
Behalf Of Bud Governale
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 3:17 PM
To: DX4WIN Reflector 
Subject: [Dx4win] Modes FT4 And JS8

I see version 9.05 added MFSK sub-modes FT4 and JS8

Where do I find FT4 and JS8??

I'm running version 9.06
I looked in:
File>Preferences>Station>Modes
I see FT8 as a choice (it's checked) but no FT4 or JS8.
I check marked MFSK just to be sure.

73,

Bud W3LL
w...@arrl.net.that
__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Dx4win] Modes

2011-02-12 Thread Kjell W. Strom
Dean,

When the cursor is in the Mode window, type the first letter of
the mode you want to indicate. If there are several modes
starting with the same letter, you may need to repeat the
typing.

73,
Kjell, PB3SM - SM6CPI
 
 

 -Original Message-
 From: dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net 
 [mailto:dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Dean
Norris
 Sent: 12 February 2011 19:36
 To: dx4win
 Subject: [Dx4win] Modes
 
 When I log a QSO, I am required to pick from a list of modes. 
  Most of the
 time the list is not in a position to display the mode I 
 want.   I only use
 SSB, CW, RTTY and FM.
 
 Is there any way to delete the rest of the modes showing on
the list??
 
 Thanks,
 
 Dean
 __
 Dx4win mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Dx4win@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list:
http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Dx4win mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Dx4win@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Dx4win] Modes

2011-02-12 Thread Mel
Just unselect the modes not used in preferences. They will still appear 
in the drop down, but the ones you have selected to use appear first so 
if you enter S, C. R, or F once it will select the right mode. Of 
course, if your radio is less than 30 years old you can probably read 
the information automatically.

On 2011-02-12 16:12, Kjell W. Strom wrote:
 Dean,

 When the cursor is in the Mode window, type the first letter of
 the mode you want to indicate. If there are several modes
 starting with the same letter, you may need to repeat the
 typing.

 73,
 Kjell, PB3SM - SM6CPI



 -Original Message-
 From: dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net
 [mailto:dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Dean
 Norris
 Sent: 12 February 2011 19:36
 To: dx4win
 Subject: [Dx4win] Modes

 When I log a QSO, I am required to pick from a list of modes.
   Most of the
 time the list is not in a position to display the mode I
 want.   I only use
 SSB, CW, RTTY and FM.

 Is there any way to delete the rest of the modes showing on
 the list??

 Thanks,

 Dean
 __
 Dx4win mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Dx4win@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list:
 http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

 __
 Dx4win mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Dx4win@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Dx4win mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Dx4win@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Dx4win] Modes

2009-09-26 Thread Mel
I have to agree with you Ernie... but I don't think all awards treat all 
digital modes equally. However I don't think the ARRL should be the one 
calling the shots... I would prefer the standards be set by an 
international group... perhaps in coordination with the ADIF group.

Ernie Walls wrote:
 It's is interesting watching the various posts , here and other places,
 about 'modes'.
 
  
 
 As far as DX4Win is concerned, I once got involved in this discussion
 thread, but used a workaround that 'satisfied' DX4Win, LOTW and me! It
 involved 'Olivia', now but not always supported by DX4Win, and a wonderful
 example of what I am about to say.
 
  
 
 The problem that has already arrived is that the good old amateur community
 has created a monster with 'modes', a monster that is going to take a fair
 bit of management in the future, and which is only going to be achieved with
 a fair bit of angst being felt by many, following a tough call from an
 important player, probably LOTW.
 
  
 
 The monster that has arrived is the mode, and specifically what mode, given
 that there are already very many, shall I say,
 oblique/boutique/nondescript/irrelevant/obscure modes already out there, and
 modern software and amateur thought will ensure many, many more in the near
 future, to a number that will be practically unmanageable as standalone
 modes.
 
  
 
 Might I say that, on this subject, we seriously risk disappearing up one's
 own major orifice. (I am sorry if this offends - I used it to indicate the
 seriousness that I forsee in the issue, already and in the future).
 
  
 
 BTW, I am not complaining, just commenting, because modes to me essentially
 mean Phone, CW, Digital (RTTY and PSK31) - and with a willingness in my
 heart to accept DATA as an all encompassing mode for all others. Folks, it's
 just my opinion.
 
  
 
 Can anyone place themselves in the shoes of the LOTW decision makers, now,
 and determine how we manage this 'monster' now, and into the future? 
 
  
 
 Let me know. Cause every individual, every logging and contest program,
 LOTW, the whole shooting match, will have to comply. And be happy!
 
  
 
 I stand by with interest cause I think it will be a lot of fun!
 
  
 
 Ernie
 
 Ernie Walls VK3FM
 
  
 
 vk...@wallsy.com.au
 
 vk...@arrl.net
 
 Mobile 0418 301 483
 
  
 
 __
 Dx4win mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Dx4win@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 
__
Dx4win mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Dx4win@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Dx4win] Modes

2009-09-25 Thread Jay Hainline
I think LOTW is trying to do what you say by grouping modes into 4 separate
groups. The 4 groups are used to issue out the various awards ARRL offers.
DATA encompasses anything digital. As far as I know, there is no individual
award by the ARRL for working everything by a single mode. WAS by psk31, or
rtty, or jt6m, or etc etc... 


Jay Hainline  KA9CFD  EN40om
Colchester, IL

-Original Message-
From: dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net]
On Behalf Of Ernie Walls
Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2009 01:26
To: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Dx4win] Modes

It's is interesting watching the various posts , here and other places,
about 'modes'.

 

As far as DX4Win is concerned, I once got involved in this discussion
thread, but used a workaround that 'satisfied' DX4Win, LOTW and me! It
involved 'Olivia', now but not always supported by DX4Win, and a wonderful
example of what I am about to say.

 

The problem that has already arrived is that the good old amateur community
has created a monster with 'modes', a monster that is going to take a fair
bit of management in the future, and which is only going to be achieved with
a fair bit of angst being felt by many, following a tough call from an
important player, probably LOTW.

 

The monster that has arrived is the mode, and specifically what mode, given
that there are already very many, shall I say,
oblique/boutique/nondescript/irrelevant/obscure modes already out there, and
modern software and amateur thought will ensure many, many more in the near
future, to a number that will be practically unmanageable as standalone
modes.

 

Might I say that, on this subject, we seriously risk disappearing up one's
own major orifice. (I am sorry if this offends - I used it to indicate the
seriousness that I forsee in the issue, already and in the future).

 

BTW, I am not complaining, just commenting, because modes to me essentially
mean Phone, CW, Digital (RTTY and PSK31) - and with a willingness in my
heart to accept DATA as an all encompassing mode for all others. Folks, it's
just my opinion.

 

Can anyone place themselves in the shoes of the LOTW decision makers, now,
and determine how we manage this 'monster' now, and into the future? 

 

Let me know. Cause every individual, every logging and contest program,
LOTW, the whole shooting match, will have to comply. And be happy!

 

I stand by with interest cause I think it will be a lot of fun!

 

Ernie

Ernie Walls VK3FM

 

vk...@wallsy.com.au

vk...@arrl.net

Mobile 0418 301 483

 

__
Dx4win mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Dx4win@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


__
Dx4win mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Dx4win@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html