[e-gold-list] 60,780 users!

[jpm]

Awesome, Jay!

You rock!

>yes you are correct jp - 60,766 in your example would be accounts
>that have at least *some* (i.e. non-zero) gold in them. the stats
>page also gives an idea of how many accounts have nothing in them -
>as we
>know the total number of accounts (136,259 at this instant) and
>a bottom limit on funded accounts (60,780 at this instant) leaving
>75,479
>maximum with no e-metal in them. (the exact actual number of accounts
>with
>any type of e-metal at all at this instant is 61,441 which is not
>possible
>to tell from the data on the stats page.) 3,923 accounts have more
>than
>one type of e-metal in them, which i think means there are 661
>accounts
>that have no e-gold but some of another e-metal type in them.
>jay w.
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[e-gold-list] ebay/ e-gold?

[Khurram Khan]

Hey Guys,

  What was the last time eBAY let you denominate your auctions in Grams of Gold.  The 
Pay By Gold site now has auctions geared towards people using gold.  Check out the 
currently running auctions at http://www.paybygold.com/beta/viewauctions.asp or log 
into PayByGold and create your own auction.

 Khurram

_
Get email for your site ---> http://www.everyone.net

---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[e-gold-list] Re: more stats!

[James H. Cloos Jr.]

> "Jay" == Jay W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Jay> - as we know the total number of accounts (136,259 at this
Jay> instant) and a bottom limit on funded accounts (60,780 at this
Jay> instant) leaving 75,479 maximum with no e-metal in them. (the
Jay> exact actual number of accounts with any type of e-metal at all
Jay> at this instant is 61,441 which is not possible to tell from the
Jay> data on the stats page.) 3,923 accounts have more than one type
Jay> of e-metal in them, which i think means there are 661 accounts
Jay> that have no e-gold but some of another e-metal type in them.

Can't resist.

How do accounts w/ negative balances fall into this picture?

:) :) :) :) :-) :-) :-) :-) :^) ;) ;)

(And a gram of Ag to anyone who can guess why that exact number of :)s
above, and why in that distribution!)

-JimC
-- 
James H. Cloos, Jr.   1024D/ED7DAEA6 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  E9E9 F828 61A4 6EA9 0F2B  63E7 997A 9F17 ED7D AEA6

---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[e-gold-list] DFLP

[David Fletcher]

Has anyony used the Digital Freedom Loan Plan???  If so how was the
returns??  I am thinking of putting some e-gold there..
Please let me know,,
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[e-gold-list] DFLP

[David Fletcher]

Has anyony used the Digital Freedom Loan Plan???  If so how was the
returns??  I am thinking of putting some e-gold there..
Please let me know,,
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[e-gold-list] Re: more stats!

[Jay W.]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

yes you are correct jp - 60,766 in your example would be accounts
that have at least *some* (i.e. non-zero) gold in them. the stats 
page also gives an idea of how many accounts have nothing in them -
as we 
know the total number of accounts (136,259 at this instant) and 
a bottom limit on funded accounts (60,780 at this instant) leaving
75,479 
maximum with no e-metal in them. (the exact actual number of accounts
with 
any type of e-metal at all at this instant is 61,441 which is not
possible 
to tell from the data on the stats page.) 3,923 accounts have more
than 
one type of e-metal in them, which i think means there are 661
accounts 
that have no e-gold but some of another e-metal type in them.
jay w.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> Guys where it says "Balance Distribution of Funded Accounts", does
> that mean that DOES NOT INCLUDE accounts with 0. balance?
> 
> Thus, number of funded accounts 60,766 means 60,766 with AT LEAST
> SOME e-gold in them?
> 
> Let us know!
> 
> Suggest where it says "0 - 1 oz." it should read "under one ounce",
> because "0 - 1 oz" suggests that includes accounts that are totally
> empty (which would be quite different)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.3

iQEVAwUBOlffkMyM0YPqVE7FAQFW4wf/ZS5Oa1S1wlVKLayrU2oS0UO7/RCc517Y
iXd3W9QvEnmuIpzBqti5fspr5avjEoGNj8XGd7sZmJAdcRYj5Nj4SCdayZx9zEfH
C+VqkBNHgThlPAhTtZU8zxa17ag/MVq1X2Cwy2xvN3dib3fAfoSnowpopJS9yHPi
hO/tx4Dgaj98AdvgYgMJOg/2frG9gbz5g2Sf1sUjRcoi4RhKGnZZ4gMvdyJqooiR
QMNhW0+QgL2U8LoTk5Ukllrd5HeSdgvJb141XAu6a63PkiXtnvLayo4sZHy4MC3X
ReoPgywSVmI63ayx+10AF1yIdeQyfn+CmZWnhk7L/DSiVQ7BGW6OmQ==
=D5fx
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[e-gold-list] more stats!

[jpm]

Guys where it says "Balance Distribution of Funded Accounts", does 
that mean that DOES NOT INCLUDE accounts with 0. balance?

Thus, number of funded accounts 60,766 means 60,766 with AT LEAST 
SOME e-gold in them?

Let us know!

Suggest where it says "0 - 1 oz." it should read "under one ounce", 
because "0 - 1 oz" suggests that includes accounts that are totally 
empty (which would be quite different)

jp


>Aching to see the 24 hour velocity figures match the total amount of e-gold
>in circulation on any given day?:
>
>http://www.e-gold.com/stats.html

---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[e-gold-list] RE: Rip Van Winkle here was e-gold accepted here

[Mark S. Ohberg]

To: e-gold Discussion,

Gentle People I am most obliged, while Thank You posts never bode well on a
discussion list,
I have been away and regret the delay of a reply.  Thanks to all who
professionally dealt with my comiquasical post.

The record was set clear here.
Reid Jackson wrote  check out the new additions to the Merchants and

> > Organizations section of the e-gold directory and do what comes
> > natural: http://www.e-gold.com/unsecure/links.htm
> >
> > Good Heavens Mr. Jackson, i mean Uncle Reid,  Please Correct me If I am
> > wrong, but i neva got da memo that the powers did away with the old
> directory
> > listing,
> No, I think you are correct that it was ditched without announcement
> Don't recall of anybody complaining when it went though.

True

> The previous directory was self service. many of the
> listings made an extremely bad impression on potential strategic etc.  The
> longer it was up, the worse it became.

Understandable

> The upside is that its demise caused the formation of other independent
> e-gold directories.   some were started pre-mortem
> http://www.golddirectory.com/Index.html
> http://www.bearerinstruments.com/
> http://www.freedomhound.com

These sites are listed on mine along with:

http://www.goldsheet.simplenet.com
http://bomis.snap.com/rings/egold/

This is the comprehensive listing

> Was it really useful to you?  It's been gone since last summer, but yet this
> is the first you've noticed.

Ah, Yep...I'm caught red handed! :-) I recall that it had a listing for Otto
Skinner's book the Biggest Tax Loophole of All
which caused me to join e-gold. I had also listed myself and made a point to
check now, due to a search engine optimization project.

> Here's a sampling of how overwhelmingly useful the old e-gold directory had
> become, presented in ascending chronological order, from the archives of the
> old e-gold-list:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/e-gold-list@free-market.net/msg01792.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/e-gold-list@free-market.net/msg01794.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/e-gold-list@free-market.net/msg01797.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/e-gold-list@free-market.net/msg01798.html
> The ideal e-gold directory would have many of the elements of the first
> (database, open to all, etc.) but with a moderator who made sure that
> listings were classified in a way useful to users of the directory.

Interesting! I recall an issue finding a moderator.  I also see my past post
recommending the e-gold web ring (Bomis snap com) to another inquirer!
The archives are not available on the current e-gold site

> > http://rootworks.com/twocentsworth.cgi?107245,  is  permission to access
> > /twocentsworth.cgi on this server.>
> This one's a question for JP May.  I know others appreciated this service as
> well.

Mr. JP May?

> In case you are also asking if those who presently have links on the present
> e-gold directory pay for them: http://www.e-gold.com/unsecure/links.htm
> The answer is no, not at this time.
> > wat bozz do i needs ta speak to?
> For links on the e-gold website, that would presently be me.  The applicable
> e-mail address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is role based, so if somebody else dons this
> hat, your e-mail should still wind up in the right inbox.
>
> > itz true my SCI iz old school but I';m  gonna  upgrade
> What website do you use the e-gold shopping cart interface (SCI) on?  I'd be
> interested to visit.

I will upgrade it this weekend on
http://www.kiac-usa.com/KiacMonthlyAuctionsPg2.html
The home page is http://www-kiac-usa.com
I am also upgrading the interactive auction to include a re-list option,
currently not many auction items, if any

> Hope your upgrade goes well.  Plenty of useful information available here:
> http://www.e-gold.com/unsecure/sci_home.html

I'm back to work! Thank You.

> > Must Change be the only constant,  24/7 ?
> Change is not the only constant,

In your opinion what else is constant?

> but, yes, plenty more is on the way.  The birth of an alternative
> monetary/financial system does not occur in a day.
> Thank you for using e-gold.

Have a great weekend--MSO
http://www.e-gold.com/e-gold.asp?cid=107245




---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[e-gold-list] Re: Places You Can SPEND e-gold

[jpm]

>Here is a link directing you to several places where you can SPEND
>e-gold for real stuff!:
>
>http://www.members.tripod.com/~lowell_potter/egodir
>

well geez you could add BANANA GOLD considering 99% of EVERY RETAIL 
ITEM PURCHASED with e-gold is done so using banana!

http://www.bananagold.com

buy anything at amazon with bananagold!!


>best, . forrest
>


---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[e-gold-list] So I talk about you on the gold economy . . .

[Elwyn Jenkins]

The Gold Economy site today has an article that at least Sidd, our friend
from Glencannon and a few others should read. It is the first article on
the front page and could enable you to make some money. Go read it and if
you want to comment about it, send an e-mail to my personal e-mail and let
me know what you think.

Happy reading!!
Dr Elwyn Jenkins
The Gold Economy
www.goldeconomy.com
++

---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[e-gold-list] Places You Can SPEND e-gold

[peelpee]

Here is a link directing you to several places where you can SPEND
e-gold for real stuff!:

http://www.members.tripod.com/~lowell_potter/egodir

best, . forrest


---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[e-gold-list] Places You Can Give e-gold

[peelpee]

Here is a link showing several excellent places where you can give
e-gold in good conscience (you, too, Angela!):

http://members.tripod.com/~lowell_potter/char

best, . forrest
.


---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[e-gold-list] According to my calculations...

[Jeff Fitzmyers]

In the last 12 day period, total accounts increased an average of 0.25%
per day. For the last 2 months the average account has about 330 USD of value.

---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[e-gold-list] Re: state of e-gold

[James M. Ray]

At 1:15 PM +1000 1/6/01, markab23 wrote:
>Here is a question.
>
>
...

Most of your questions either have been answered or would be better
answered by an attorney (and I'm not one). Any of the tax/jurisdictional
ones are lawyers-only, but the form of your question (and my answer)
can bring up something that's on topic for the list, besides quoting the
right entity when you're quoting an entity...

NOT quoting the entire message back to email lists every time you reply
saves bandwidth, increases your signal-to-noise ratio dramatically so
that folks aren't as likely to killfile you and more-likely to read what you
wrote, and is considerate to those who choose to receive this list in a
digest format. I'll quote the list owner's words that we all received upon
signup and perhaps didn't read carefully:

>3.  Cite only those portion of previous posts pertinent to the points
>you wish to make or the questions you wish to ask.  If it's not worth
>your time to make this effort, then don't post.^
  ^

(My own emphasis added.) I don't mean to pick on markab23, since
he's not the worst offender, but folks, the technology to be considerate
to others and save list.bandwidth is _THERE_, in your email programs.
Please, figure it out and use it! There are/were interesting people on
this list, and I say "were" because yes, some of them have been driven
off by the increasing noise-level. Thanks in advance for helping me to
end this problem.
JMR

---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[e-gold-list] Re: state of e-gold

[Dale Pond]

Jeff Fitzmyers wrote:
> 
> > Are they 'offshore' to US citizens?
> ???
> 
"To further solidify where IRS & BATF have jurisdiction, and to establish where
taxes in the Internal Revenue Code apply when there is geographical application,
Consider definitions of the terms "United States", "State", and "Citizen" at 26
CFR § 31.3121(e)-1. These definitions apply to Social Security, unemployment
tax, etc., with the original enactment in 1935. These definitions are possibly
the clearest relating to administration of the Internal Revenue Code, and are
particularly important as they demonstrate application to Alaska and Hawaii
before 1960 but not after, and application to Guam and American Samoa after
January 1, 1961:

  (a) When used in the regulations in this subpart, the term "State"
includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin
Islands, and Territories of Alaska and Hawaii before their admission as States,
and (when used with respect to services performed after 1960) Guam and American
Samoa. 

  (b) When used in the regulations in this subpart, the term "United
States", when used in a geographical sense, means the several states (including
the Territories of Alaska and Hawaii before their admission as States), the
District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.
When used in the regulations in this subpart with respect to services performed
after 1960, the term "United States" also includes Guam and American Samoa when
the term is used in a geographical sense. The term "citizen of the United
States" includes a citizen of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico or the Virgin
Islands, and, effective January 1, 1961, a citizen of Guam or American Samoa.

The allegation that most Federal laws presently on the books are applicable only
in territory belonging to the United States might seem far-fetched even with
proofs already established in this discourse, but consider the definitions at 18
U.S.C. § 921(a)(2), which are applicable for Chapter 44 -- Firearms, in the
current edition of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §§ 921-930).

  § 921. Definitions 

  (a) As used in this chapter --

  (2) The term "interstate or foreign commerce" includes commerce between
any place in a State and any place outside of that State, or within any
possession of the United States (not including the Canal Zone) or the District
of Columbia, but such term does not include commerce between places within the
same State but through any place outside of that State. The term "State"
includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the
possessions of the United States (not including the Canal Zone). [Emphasis added]

Application of the term "State" above is exclusive of the Union of several
States party to the Constitution -- all examples of the class are territories
and possessions of the United States subject to Congress' Article IV § 3.2
legislative jurisdiction."

For further reading on this:

http://www.svpvril.com/meador_it.html

-- 
Regards,
Dale Pond
Delta Spectrum Research
http://www.SVPvril.com
Sympathetic Vibratory Physics
Sacred Science - Sacred Life
SVP Discussion Forum:
http://www.egroups.com/list/svpvril/

---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]