[ECOLOG-L] RADIOCARBON 2012

2012-02-03 Thread Fabio Marzaioli
SORRY FOR CROSSPOSTING!



Dear Colleagues 
This is a message to draw your attention about the approaching of the deadline 
for the abstract submission for the Radiocarbon 2012 conference to be held in 
Paris in July 2012 (details are reported at the end of the message or can be 
found at the url: http://www.radiocarbon2012.com/).
For this year the Scientific/Organizing committee  decided to open this 
conference also to applicative sectors.
With this message I want to inform you about the opening of a specific session 
about the application of modeling techniques to disentangle  processes 
characterizing the climate system and/or the C cycle with the following outline:

Radiocarbon, the cosmogenic and anthropogenic (bomb carbon) radionuclide, is 
widespread in all the environmental compartments being naturally involved in 
the global carbon cycle. Due to its nature, 14C preserves the potential to 
serve as process tracer and/or chronometer. Since its discovery and the birth 
of the radiocarbon dating methodology, modelling approaches have been widely 
applied to disentangle the physical mechanisms governing its production and 
observed distributions. Over the last decades, with the advent of the earth and 
climate change sciences, radiocarbon became a preferential tool for the study 
of dynamical processes in climate and carbon cycle. For the carbon cycle, this 
includes interactions with the physical climate system, and this has been 
investigated using a variety of modelling tools and methods. 

This session aims to attract contributions applying modelling approaches to the 
study of processes characterizing the atmosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere and 
atmosphere and fluxes within and between these compartments. Contributions 
quantifying natural changes and the impact of anthropogenic actions on the 
contemporary and past climate system are also particularly welcome.

Keywords
14C production modelling, direct/inverse modelling for global cycle, past and 
contemporary climate change
I invite you all to spread this information to anybody else can be interested
Thank you for your kind attention and collaboration,
I hope to see you in Paris 
On the behalf of the session conveners (R. Muscheler (SWE), K. Rodgers (USA))

Fabio Marzaioli, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Second University of Naples
Faculty of Sciences & Environmental Sciences Department
Centre for Isotopic Research on Cultural and Environmental heritage
Tel. +390823274814
fax. +390823274605

[ECOLOG-L] C source/sink database

2009-03-27 Thread Fabio Marzaioli

Dear ecologgers
I am looking for a total (land plus oceans) C source/sink database  
over the 1964/2005 period.

Any suggestions?
Thank you

Fabio Marzaioli, Ph.D.
Environmental Sciences Department
Centre for Isotopic Research on Cultural and Environmental heritage
Tel. +390823274814/4631
fax. +390823274605


R: carbon sequestration?

2007-03-12 Thread Fabio Marzaioli
Dear list=20
I'd like to stress one important point on Carbon sequestration
Earth, neglecting radiocarbon cosmogenic formation, can be considered a
closed system for CThis means that Carbon in the earth is constant, =
was
formed during the nucleosynthesis and entered in the earth during the =
planet
formation... Carbon can be allocated is several environmental =
compartments
which exchange carbon at different timescales creating the C cycle. =
Usually,
according to these timescales, C cycle can be split in biogeochemical
(mainly composed by oceans, atmospheric and terrestrial C reservoirs =
which
cycles on timescales comparable to the man life) and geochemical cycle.
Anthropogenic actions acting on short timescales (CO2 is rising since =
the
industrial era) are altering the biogeochemical cycle fastening the =
release
of CO2 (fossil fuel burning) from a reservoir (fossil reservoir) which =
can
be considered part of the geochemical cycle.=20
Oceans, sequestering CO2 by means of a chemo-physical mechanism (Henry =
law),
and terrestrial ecosystems (sequestering carbon via photosynthesis) are
acting as a buffer (atmospheric increase of CO2 is lower than CO2 =
release
from fossil fuel burning) for anthropogenic emissions, both SEQUESTERING =
CO2
with long release timesWhile Oceans response can be predicted and =
its
timescale quantified terrestrial response, because of the complex =
mechanisms
determining the exchange, is more difficult to be predicted and =
timescale
quantified



-Messaggio originale-
Da: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Christopher A. Farmer
Inviato: mercoled=EC 7 marzo 2007 22.32
A: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Oggetto: Re: carbon sequestration?

Hi All,
I feel that the best way to look at this question is to look at it in =
terms
of the carbon cycle. If we are talking about carbon with respect to =
global
climate change, the exact form of carbon doesn't matter. CO2 in the
atmosphere is what affects radiative forcing, so no matter how that CO2 =
is
taken up, any reduction in CO2 would help lessen the effects of warming.
If you are sequestering carbon in forests and soils, you are talking =
about
the conversion of CO2 into cellulose, lignin and other plant materials =
that
will hopefully remain in that pool for a long time. That is, the forest
needs to remain forest for a long time to actually sequester carbon.
If you are talking about sequestration of carbon in the ocean, you are
looking at two different processes. First, CO2 will be used for cellular
material by algae and other photosynthetic organisms in the water =
column.
When they die, they settle to the ocean bottom and eventually lithify =
(turn
to some kind of sedimentary rock). The other process is a geologic =
process
whereby CO2 is absorbed in clayey materials when silica rich rocks =
(think
granite and sandstone) are weathered. These clays will be transported
downstream and eventually reach the ocean and become sediment.

So I guess the take away point would be that any process which removes =
CO2
from the atmosphere and stores it in a long lived pool/sink could be
considered sequestration.

Hope that helps,
Chris Farmer

--- Christopher Habeck wrote:
Carbon sequestration is the capture and long-term storage of atmospheric =
ca=3D
rbon by terrestrial plants, soils, and the ocean.  Christopher =
Habeck=3D20
Zoology Graduate Student=3D20
University of Wisconsin=3D20

> Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 10:52:30 -0800> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: =
ca=3D
rbon sequestration?> To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU> > I'm a bit confused =
ab=3D
out what people mean when they talk about carbon sequestration. In some =
pap=3D
ers it seems to refer to atmoshpheric carbon dioxide uptake, other times =
it=3D
 seems to refer to the ability of soils or plants to store carbon. So, =
gene=3D
rally speaking does "carbon sequestration" refer to CO2 or C?> > Sorry =
if t=3D
his is a dumb question, I have no background in this. Thanks in =
advance...>=3D
 > > -> Finding fabulous fares is fun.> =
Let=3D
 Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and =
hote=3D
l bargains.
_
Explore the seven wonders of the world
http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=3D3D7+wonders+world&mkt=3D3Den-US&fo=
rm=3D3DQ=3D
BRE=3D
--- end of quote ---

--=20
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.7/712 - Release Date: =
06/03/2007
15.42
=20

--=20
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.7/713 - Release Date: =
07/03/2007
9.24
=20