**

** **

*AAG **Annual Meeting New York (24-28 February 2012)*

*CFP: GaWC’s interlocking network model - foundations, applications, and
critiques***

** **

The objective of this CFP is to develop a timely overview of (i) the main
applications of and (ii) the critiques raised against the ‘interlocking
network model’ (INM) for studying world city networks (WCNs). The INM for
studying WCNs has been devised in the context of the Globalization and World
Cities (GaWC) research network. GaWC is a non-institutionalized,
collaborative venture between researchers in different parts of the world.
GaWC’s main gateway is its website (http://www.lboro.ac.uk/gawc), where
everyone is welcome to share ideas, publications and data on WCNs, and this
without favoring particular metatheoretical readings, geographical foci, or
conceptual and empirical approaches. ****

** **

GaWC’s raison d’être lies in the analysis of the transnational, external
relations of cities, and a key contribution has thus been the formal
analysis of WCNs through this INM. In the initial specification in Taylor
(2001), it was put forward that globalized producer services firms are the
key network makers in the WCN in that these firms ‘interlock’ cities through
their transnational, city-centered location strategies. Since the Taylor
(2001) publication, GaWC’s INM for studying WCNs has been widely used and
debated, e.g.:****

**·         **The INM has been used as starting point for empirical analyses
of the WCN by applying it to data on the location strategies of a selection
of ‘global’ producer services firms (e.g. Taylor et al., 2002; Derudder and
Taylor, 2005; Taylor et al., 2011).****

**·         **At the same time, this recurring focus on ‘global’ producer
services firms for studying WCNs has been criticized on numerous grounds,
including alleged structuralist tendencies, potential normative
implications, and ‘Western-centeredness’ (e.g. Robinson, 2002; Massey, 2007;
Bassens et al., 2011).****

**·         **The INM’s network-analytical foundations have been scrutinized
(e.g. Nordlund, 2004; Lambregts, 2008; Neal, 2011).****

**·         **The INM’s conceptual underpinnings have been further
contextualized, detailed and refined (e.g. Beaverstock et al., 2002; Taylor,
2007; Derudder, 2006)****

**·         **The INM has been applied at other scales, especially in the
context of the analysis of polycentric city-regions (e.g. Pain, 2008; Hoyler
et al., 2008; Lüthi et al., 2011)****

**·         **Other WCN agents have been analyzed through the lens of the
INM, including NGO’s, media firms, and Islamic financial services firms
(e.g. Taylor, 2004; Watson & Hoyler, 2011; Bassens et al., 2010)****

**·         **…****

** **

The purpose of this CFP is to bring together researchers that make use of
and/or critically engage with GaWC’s interlocking network model for studying
WCNs. Based on the ensuing overview of uses and critiques, it also seeks to
develop a round-up of the merits/drawbacks of the model as well as outline
some avenues for future research.  ****

** **

Interested participants should send a title and an *abstract of about 250
words *to Ben Derudder (ben.derud...@ugent.be) by *September 15th *at the
latest. Note that contributors will have to register for the conference and
submit their abstract the regular way (i.e. through the AAG website:
http://www.aag.org/cs/annualmeeting), after which they need send the
*registration
code (PIN) *they receive. ****

  ****

References:****

**·         **Bassens, D., Derudder, B. & Witlox, F. (2010) Searching for
the Mecca of finance: Islamic financial services and the world city network.
AREA, 42(1), 35-46.****

**·         **Bassens, D., Derudder, B. & Witlox, F. (2011) Setting ‘other’
standards: on the role, power and spatialities of interlocking Shari’a
boards in Islamic financial services. Geoforum, 42, 94-103.****
**·         **Beaverstock, J.V., Doel, M.A., Hubbard, P.J. & Taylor, P.J.
(2002) Attending to the World: Competition/Co-operation and Co-efficiency in
the World City Network. Global Networks, 2 (2), 111-132.****

**·         **Derudder, B. (2006) On Conceptual Confusion in Empirical
Analyses of a Transnational Urban Network. Urban Studies, 43 (11),
2027-2046.****

**·         **Derudder, B. & Taylor, P.J. (2005)The Cliquishness of World
Cities. Global Networks, 5 (1), (2005), 71-91.****

**·         **Hoyler, M., Freytag, T. & Mager, C. (2008) Connecting
Rhine-Main: The Production of Multi-Scalar Polycentricities through
Knowledge-Intensive Business Services Regional Studies, 42 (8), 1095-1111.**
**

**·         **Lambregts, B. (2008) Geographies of knowledge formation in
mega-city regions: Some evidence from the Dutch Randstad. Regional Studies,
42(8), pp. 1173-1186.****

**·         **Lüthi, S., Thierstein, A. & Bentlage, M. (2011) Interlocking
Firm Networks in the German Knowledge Economy:  on Local Networks and Global
Connectivity. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 69(3), 161-174.****

**·         **Massey, D. (2007) World City. Polity Press: London.****

**·         **Neal, Z. (2011) Structural Determinism in the Interlocking
World City Network . Geographical Analysis, forthcoming.****

**·         **Nordlund, C. (2004) A Critical Comment on the *Taylor Approach
for Measuring World City Interlock Linkages. *Geographical Analysis, 36(3),
290–296.****

**·         **Pain, K. (2008) Examining 'Core-Periphery' Relationships in a
Global City-Region: The Case of London and South East England. Regional
Studies, 42(8), 1161-1172. ****

**·         **Robinson, J. (2002) Global and world cities: A view from off
the map. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(3),
531-554.****
**·         **Taylor, P.J. (2001) Specification of the World City Network.
Geographical Analysis, 33 (2), 181-194.****

**·         **Taylor, P.J. (2004) The New Geography of Global Civil Society:
NGOs in the World City Network. Globalizations, 1(2), 265-277. ****

**·         **Taylor, P.J. (2007) Problematizing City/State Relations:
Towards a Geohistorical Understanding of Contemporary Globalization .
Transactions
of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(2), 133-150.****

**·         **Taylor, P.J., Catalano, G. & Walker, D.R.F. (2002) Exploratory
Analysis of the World City Network. Urban Studies, 39(13), 2377-2394.****

**·         **Taylor, P. Ni, P., Derudder, B., Hoyler, M. & Huang J. &
Witlox, F. (eds.) (2011) Global Urban Analysis: A Survey of Cities in
Globalization. London: Earthscan.****

**·         **Watson, A. & Hoyler, M. (2011) Global Media Cities in
Transnational Media Networks. GaWC research Bulletin 358.****

** **

** **

** **

[image: Description: SEG_digitale handtekening - ben]****

**

<<image001.jpg>>

Reply via email to