[Ecryptfs] [Bug 362427] Re: Public key ssh auth doesn't work with my Encrypted Home Directory

2009-04-19 Thread Alexander Kraev
Hi, Dustin!

The workaround works. Could you please give me a link to good
description of private directory's encryption in Ubuntu, internals and
so on.

Many thanks,
Alex

-- 
Public key ssh auth doesn't work with my Encrypted Home Directory
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362427
You received this bug notification because you are a member of eCryptfs,
which is subscribed to ecryptfs-utils in ubuntu.

Status in eCryptfs - Enterprise Cryptographic Filesystem: Invalid
Status in “ecryptfs-utils” source package in Ubuntu: Invalid
Status in “openssh” source package in Ubuntu: Invalid

Bug description:
Spent all night to understand why public key ssh auth doesn't work. It seems to 
me that issue only affects Jaunty. Please have a look at the details below.

So, the configuration is:

1. Client
- lsb_release: Ubuntu 8.10 intrepid
- ssh-client: OpenSSH_5.1p1 Debian-3ubuntu1, OpenSSL 0.9.8g 19 Oct 2007

2. Server A
- lsb_release: Ubuntu 8.04.2 hardy
- sshd: OpenSSH_4.7p1 Debian-8ubuntu1.2, OpenSSL 0.9.8g 19 Oct 2007

3. Server B
- lsb_release: Ubuntu 9.04 jaunty
- sshd: OpenSSH_5.1p1 Debian-5ubuntu1, OpenSSL 0.9.8g 19 Oct 2007

Server A and Server B have the same /etc/ssh/sshd_config:
RSAAuthentication yes
PubkeyAuthentication yes
StrictModes no

I turned StrictModes to no, but every server has the same permissions on 
user's .ssh folder and .ssh/authorized_keys file. authorized_keys is the same 
on Server A and Server B.

So, I am able to connect with public key from Client machine to Server A, but I 
can't connect to Server B.

I run ssh client and sshd on Server B in debug mode, please find logs attached.

Most important strings from auth.log:

...
Apr 16 20:58:47 ubuntu sshd[21728]: debug3: mm_request_receive entering
Apr 16 20:58:47 ubuntu sshd[21728]: debug3: monitor_read: checking request 21
Apr 16 20:58:47 ubuntu sshd[21728]: debug3: mm_answer_keyallowed entering
Apr 16 20:58:47 ubuntu sshd[21728]: debug3: mm_answer_keyallowed: 
key_from_blob: 0xb9084978
Apr 16 20:58:47 ubuntu sshd[21728]: debug1: Checking blacklist file 
/usr/share/ssh/blacklist.DSA-1024
Apr 16 20:58:47 ubuntu sshd[21728]: debug1: Checking blacklist file 
/etc/ssh/blacklist.DSA-1024
Apr 16 20:58:47 ubuntu sshd[21728]: debug1: temporarily_use_uid: 1000/1000 
(e=0/0)
Apr 16 20:58:47 ubuntu sshd[21728]: debug1: trying public key file 
/home/sasha/.ssh/authorized_keys
Apr 16 20:58:47 ubuntu sshd[21728]: debug1: restore_uid: 0/0
Apr 16 20:58:47 ubuntu sshd[21728]: debug1: temporarily_use_uid: 1000/1000 
(e=0/0)
Apr 16 20:58:47 ubuntu sshd[21728]: debug1: trying public key file 
/home/sasha/.ssh/authorized_keys2
Apr 16 20:58:47 ubuntu sshd[21728]: debug1: restore_uid: 0/0
Apr 16 20:58:47 ubuntu sshd[21728]: Failed publickey for sasha from 10.0.0.11 
port 51194 ssh2
Apr 16 20:58:47 ubuntu sshd[21728]: debug3: mm_answer_keyallowed: key 
0xb9084978 is not allowed
...

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ecryptfs
Post to : ecryptfs@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ecryptfs
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Ecryptfs] [Bug 363876] Re: ecryptfs create Private dir with wrong permissions

2009-04-19 Thread Paolo Benvenuto
jaunty RC

-- 
ecryptfs create Private dir with wrong permissions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363876
You received this bug notification because you are a member of eCryptfs,
which is subscribed to ecryptfs-utils in ubuntu.

Status in “ecryptfs-utils” source package in Ubuntu: New

Bug description:
Binary package hint: ecryptfs-utils

I issued:

$ sudo aptitude install ecryptfs-utils
$ ecryptfs-setup-private

I got;

Private dir had permissions dr-x--, i.e. it was 500, not 700

besides that, mount didn't reported any dir Private mounted

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ecryptfs
Post to : ecryptfs@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ecryptfs
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Ecryptfs] [Bug 363876] [NEW] ecryptfs create Private dir with wrong permissions

2009-04-19 Thread Paolo Benvenuto
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: ecryptfs-utils

I issued:

$ sudo aptitude install ecryptfs-utils
$ ecryptfs-setup-private

I got;

Private dir had permissions dr-x--, i.e. it was 500, not 700

besides that, mount didn't reported any dir Private mounted

** Affects: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
ecryptfs create Private dir with wrong permissions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363876
You received this bug notification because you are a member of eCryptfs,
which is subscribed to ecryptfs-utils in ubuntu.

Status in “ecryptfs-utils” source package in Ubuntu: New

Bug description:
Binary package hint: ecryptfs-utils

I issued:

$ sudo aptitude install ecryptfs-utils
$ ecryptfs-setup-private

I got;

Private dir had permissions dr-x--, i.e. it was 500, not 700

besides that, mount didn't reported any dir Private mounted

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ecryptfs
Post to : ecryptfs@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ecryptfs
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Ecryptfs] [Bug 363876] Re: ecryptfs create Private dir with wrong permissions

2009-04-19 Thread Dustin Kirkland
This is by design, not a bug.

When the private directory is not mounted, the permissions are 500 so
that you don't inadvertently write data to the unecrypted mountpoint.

Once it's mounted, then the permissions will be 700.

Did you log out and log back in to see if the automount takes place?

:-Dustin

** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
ecryptfs create Private dir with wrong permissions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363876
You received this bug notification because you are a member of eCryptfs,
which is subscribed to ecryptfs-utils in ubuntu.

Status in “ecryptfs-utils” source package in Ubuntu: Invalid

Bug description:
Binary package hint: ecryptfs-utils

I issued:

$ sudo aptitude install ecryptfs-utils
$ ecryptfs-setup-private

I got;

Private dir had permissions dr-x--, i.e. it was 500, not 700

besides that, mount didn't reported any dir Private mounted

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ecryptfs
Post to : ecryptfs@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ecryptfs
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Ecryptfs] [Bug 362427] Re: Public key ssh auth doesn't work with my Encrypted Home Directory

2009-04-19 Thread Dustin Kirkland
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Alexander Kraev
alexander.kr...@gmail.com wrote:
 The workaround works. Could you please give me a link to good
 description of private directory's encryption in Ubuntu, internals and
 so on.

http://blog.dustinkirkland.com/2009/02/how-encrypted-home-ecryptfs-
works.html

:-Dustin

-- 
Public key ssh auth doesn't work with my Encrypted Home Directory
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362427
You received this bug notification because you are a member of eCryptfs,
which is subscribed to ecryptfs-utils in ubuntu.

Status in eCryptfs - Enterprise Cryptographic Filesystem: Invalid
Status in “ecryptfs-utils” source package in Ubuntu: Invalid
Status in “openssh” source package in Ubuntu: Invalid

Bug description:
Spent all night to understand why public key ssh auth doesn't work. It seems to 
me that issue only affects Jaunty. Please have a look at the details below.

So, the configuration is:

1. Client
- lsb_release: Ubuntu 8.10 intrepid
- ssh-client: OpenSSH_5.1p1 Debian-3ubuntu1, OpenSSL 0.9.8g 19 Oct 2007

2. Server A
- lsb_release: Ubuntu 8.04.2 hardy
- sshd: OpenSSH_4.7p1 Debian-8ubuntu1.2, OpenSSL 0.9.8g 19 Oct 2007

3. Server B
- lsb_release: Ubuntu 9.04 jaunty
- sshd: OpenSSH_5.1p1 Debian-5ubuntu1, OpenSSL 0.9.8g 19 Oct 2007

Server A and Server B have the same /etc/ssh/sshd_config:
RSAAuthentication yes
PubkeyAuthentication yes
StrictModes no

I turned StrictModes to no, but every server has the same permissions on 
user's .ssh folder and .ssh/authorized_keys file. authorized_keys is the same 
on Server A and Server B.

So, I am able to connect with public key from Client machine to Server A, but I 
can't connect to Server B.

I run ssh client and sshd on Server B in debug mode, please find logs attached.

Most important strings from auth.log:

...
Apr 16 20:58:47 ubuntu sshd[21728]: debug3: mm_request_receive entering
Apr 16 20:58:47 ubuntu sshd[21728]: debug3: monitor_read: checking request 21
Apr 16 20:58:47 ubuntu sshd[21728]: debug3: mm_answer_keyallowed entering
Apr 16 20:58:47 ubuntu sshd[21728]: debug3: mm_answer_keyallowed: 
key_from_blob: 0xb9084978
Apr 16 20:58:47 ubuntu sshd[21728]: debug1: Checking blacklist file 
/usr/share/ssh/blacklist.DSA-1024
Apr 16 20:58:47 ubuntu sshd[21728]: debug1: Checking blacklist file 
/etc/ssh/blacklist.DSA-1024
Apr 16 20:58:47 ubuntu sshd[21728]: debug1: temporarily_use_uid: 1000/1000 
(e=0/0)
Apr 16 20:58:47 ubuntu sshd[21728]: debug1: trying public key file 
/home/sasha/.ssh/authorized_keys
Apr 16 20:58:47 ubuntu sshd[21728]: debug1: restore_uid: 0/0
Apr 16 20:58:47 ubuntu sshd[21728]: debug1: temporarily_use_uid: 1000/1000 
(e=0/0)
Apr 16 20:58:47 ubuntu sshd[21728]: debug1: trying public key file 
/home/sasha/.ssh/authorized_keys2
Apr 16 20:58:47 ubuntu sshd[21728]: debug1: restore_uid: 0/0
Apr 16 20:58:47 ubuntu sshd[21728]: Failed publickey for sasha from 10.0.0.11 
port 51194 ssh2
Apr 16 20:58:47 ubuntu sshd[21728]: debug3: mm_answer_keyallowed: key 
0xb9084978 is not allowed
...

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ecryptfs
Post to : ecryptfs@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ecryptfs
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp