Re: consulting services for graduate students?

2000-01-22 Thread chendrix8685

I've provided such assistance to several (perhaps many)
graduates students; the matter of "how much is too much"
has frankly not entered my mind.  Nearly all of those
who approach me have been exposed to some level of training
in statistical methods and/or the design of experiments.
However... in general... this training has confused more
than it enlightened.  It is sad, but true, most courses
in "designed experiments" are virtually a waste for
scientists and engineers; too much math and too complex.
I don't know what makes people think that "statistics"
can be learned in one semester... or that computer
software can substitute for (1) sound training in
designed experiments and/or (2) for deep thinking about
how the data will come to be and what we will do with
the data.

That said, here are my ground rules for helping graduate
students.  First, I am an engineer... so I will advise
only students who are working in physical sciences or
engineering; not in the life sciences.  I do not understand
living things.  Second, I insist that they show evidence
that they are learning from me; I'm not going to just
do the work for them.  Third, as part of this, we must
have dialogues back-and-forth about their project.
I will not accept their data "after the fact" and see what
I can do with it; I must be involved from the beginning
(or at least before the experiments are run.)

This may sound harsh, but I spent 40+ years working in
industry... in charge of an applied statistics group.
Almost without exception we had to teach scientists
and engineers basic statistical methods and designed
experiments (this includes M.S. and PhDs); their
training at the graduate level was not at all useful to
them.  This is harsh... but it is a fact of life.

Comments are welcome!!

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (EAKIN MARK E) wrote:

 A graduate student showed me an email from a web-based service that
offers
 to help graduate students plan their study, analyze the data, and
edit the
 results. He was concerned about the ethics of using this service.
 In my opinion, graduate students have always received this kind
 of assistance from their committee members and fellow students. My
only
 concern would be the amount of assistance provided and the inclusion
of
 appropriate citation(s). But for me this leads to the question of how
much
 is too much?

  Any comments?

 Mark Eakin
 Associate Professor
 Information Systems and Management Sciences Department
 University of Texas at Arlington
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.


===
  This list is open to everyone. Occasionally, people lacking respect
  for other members of the list send messages that are inappropriate
  or unrelated to the list's discussion topics. Please just delete the
  offensive email.

  For information concerning the list, please see the following web page:
  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
===



Re: Sample Size for an Audit

2000-01-19 Thread chendrix8685

In any situation of this sort, the amount of data you
need is related to the amount of variation you expect
to find in the data... and is also related to "how close
do you want your answer to be to the truth" and also
with what probablity do you want to be that close to the
truth.  By truth I mean "true average response" or the
population average.  Statistical sampling theory is usually
founded on taking a small sample from a large (infinite)
population so that the sample does not "disturb" the
population. If the sample size is a significant fraction
of the entire population (as it will be in this instance,
with only 20 people in the population), then a correction
is needed to the usual formula for determining the correct
sample size.  I don't have that formula/correction at
hand, but if you want it (or want a little paper I wrote
on this) let me know at  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  If you
want the paper, I'll need a fax number to send it to...
it is not digitized.   If the response you are measuring
is a "pass/fail" response, that makes life easier because
we can estimate the standard deviation quickly and
painlessly.  When all is said and done, with a population
of only 20, the sample will need to be a large fraction of
the population.  Perhaps as many as 10 or 12.
Charlie H.

In article 86536f$j77$[EMAIL PROTECTED],
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 We are going to do a quality system audit (like ISO 9000).  How do I
 choose the sample size for a particular group of people?  Let's say
 that there are 20 supervisors and I will audit their knowledge of SPC,
 how many should I choose for the audit?

 Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
 Before you buy.



Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.