Re: Fundamental differences between Statistics and Data Mining?

2000-11-20 Thread P.G.Hamer

T.S. Lim wrote:

> I'm attempting to compile an online list of the fundamental differences
> between our field Statistics and Data Mining. Several online references
> that touch on the topic include
>
>http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~jhf/ftp/dm-stat.ps
>http://www.acm.org/sigkdd/explorations/issue1-1/contents.htm#Hand
>http://www.acm.org/sigkdd/explorations/issue1-2/contents.htm#mannila
>
> Let me know your point of view or opinion. Thanks much.
>

Can I add  the magnificent
Greater and Lesser Statistics: A Choice for Future Research
J. M. Chambers
from http://www.wavelet.org/who/jmc/pub.html

I find it almost unbearably sad.

It certainly suggests that, while the statistical community might have
the knowledge and skills to address `data mining' style problems, its
value-system makes it unwilling to do so -- or to value the work if
it is attempted.

There are af course many honourable exceptions, including Chambers
himself.

Peter



=
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=



Re: Fundamental differences between Statistics and Data Mining?

2000-11-19 Thread Gaj Vidmar

Here are two other sources that may be relevant:

"Putting Data Minig in its Place" by D. Pyle
(used to be at http://www.vldb.com/articles/Pyle/pyle.html; can't access it
at the moment)

"Data Mining from a Statistical Perspective" by J. Maindonald
(http://wwwmaths.anu.edu.au/~johnm/dm/dmpaper.html)

As a user of statistical and/or other DM methods at best, rather than
providing an amateur opinion, I can only thank you for the references you
have provided.

Gaj Vidmar
Univ. of Ljubljana, Dept. of Psychology





=
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=



Re: Fundamental differences between Statistics and Data Mining?

2000-11-18 Thread T.S. Lim

In article <8v087k$tm5$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  T.S. Lim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm attempting to compile an online list of the fundamental
differences
> between our field Statistics and Data Mining. Several online
references
> that touch on the topic include
>
>http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~jhf/ftp/dm-stat.ps
>http://www.acm.org/sigkdd/explorations/issue1-1/contents.htm#Hand
>http://www.acm.org/sigkdd/explorations/issue1-
2/contents.htm#mannila
>
> Let me know your point of view or opinion. Thanks much.


More references have been posted at

   http://www.recursive-partitioning.com/dcforum/DCForumID4/2.html

--
T.S. Lim
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.Recursive-Partitioning.com
_
Get paid to write reviews! http://recursive-partitioning.epinions.com


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.


=
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=



Re: Fundamental differences between Statistics and Data Mining?

2000-11-17 Thread Robert Hamer

>> I'm attempting to compile an online list of the fundamental differences
>> between our field Statistics and Data Mining. Several online references
>> that touch on the topic include

It's very simple.  Data Mining is everything they
taught you _not_ do do when you took statistics.

-- 
--(Signature)  Robert M. Hamer 732 235 4218
  Use my last name @rci.rutgers.edu
  "Mit der Dummheit kaempfen Goetter selbst vergebens" -- Schiller


=
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=



Re: Fundamental differences between Statistics and Data Mining?

2000-11-17 Thread Francois Bergeret

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--7016062B1E244333164619B2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,

my opinion is that datamining is just a marketing name, because datamining
techniques are a part of statistics. May be an exception to this is neural
networks, but I believe that good neural networks use also statistics.

Francois.

"T.S. Lim" wrote:

> I'm attempting to compile an online list of the fundamental differences
> between our field Statistics and Data Mining. Several online references
> that touch on the topic include
>
>http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~jhf/ftp/dm-stat.ps
>http://www.acm.org/sigkdd/explorations/issue1-1/contents.htm#Hand
>http://www.acm.org/sigkdd/explorations/issue1-2/contents.htm#mannila
>
> Let me know your point of view or opinion. Thanks much.
>
> --
> T.S. Lim
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.Recursive-Partitioning.com
> _
> Get paid to write reviews! http://recursive-partitioning.epinions.com
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.

--7016062B1E244333164619B2
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
 name="francois.bergeret.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Francois Bergeret
Content-Disposition: attachment;
 filename="francois.bergeret.vcf"

begin:vcard 
n:Bergeret;Francois
tel;work:33-561191205
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:Motorola;Device Engineering, MOS20
adr:;;
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Statistician and Six Sigma Black Belt
x-mozilla-cpt:;-28000
fn:Bergeret, Francois
end:vcard

--7016062B1E244333164619B2--



=
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=