Re: coefficient in logistic regression

2002-01-26 Thread Timothy W. Victor

Assuming you have coded everything correctly, I would look at something
called complete or quasi-complete separation. These conditions often
lead to grossly inflated coefficients.

Claudiu D. Tufis wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 
 
 I have a multiple logistic regression. Among the predictors, I have 6
 variables that represent the dummies for an interaction term (the
 seventh is the reference category and is not included in analysis). I
 have obtained for five of these variables extremely large
 coefficients: exp(b) ranges from 90,000 to 166,000.
 
 
 
 Could you please tell me if it is normal to have such values for
 exp(b)? Do you think it is something wrong?
 
 
 
 Thank you very much

-- 
Tim Victor
Policy Research, Evaluation, and Measurement
Psychology in Education Division
Graduate School of Education
University of Pennsylvania


=
Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the
problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at
  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=



Re: coefficient in logistic regression

2002-01-26 Thread Kevin C. Heslin

Something from Greenland and Rothman's book Modern Epidemiology (page 258)
may apply here:

there is a hallmark sysmptom of the bias that arises when stratification
has exceeded the limits of the data: The exposure effect estimates begin to
get further and further from the null as more variables are added to the
stratification or regression model. [...] This inflation is sometimes
mistakenly interpreted as evidence of confounding, but in our experience is
more often bias due to applying large-sample methods to excessively sparse
data.

how many variables are in your model?  maybe you're stratifying so much
that you're ending up with near-empty cells.

KH


At 10:44 AM 1/26/2002 -0500, Timothy W. Victor wrote:
Assuming you have coded everything correctly, I would look at something
called complete or quasi-complete separation. These conditions often
lead to grossly inflated coefficients.

Claudiu D. Tufis wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 
 
 I have a multiple logistic regression. Among the predictors, I have 6
 variables that represent the dummies for an interaction term (the
 seventh is the reference category and is not included in analysis). I
 have obtained for five of these variables extremely large
 coefficients: exp(b) ranges from 90,000 to 166,000.
 
 
 
 Could you please tell me if it is normal to have such values for
 exp(b)? Do you think it is something wrong?
 
 
 
 Thank you very much

-- 
Tim Victor
Policy Research, Evaluation, and Measurement
Psychology in Education Division
Graduate School of Education
University of Pennsylvania


=
Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the
problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at
  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=




=
Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the
problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at
  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=



coefficient in logistic regression

2002-01-25 Thread Claudiu D. Tufis








Hi, 



I have a multiple logistic regression. Among the predictors, I have 6
variables that represent the dummies for an interaction term (the seventh is
the reference category and is not included in analysis). I have obtained for
five of these variables extremely large coefficients: exp(b)
ranges from 90,000 to 166,000. 



Could you please tell me if it is normal to have such values for exp(b)? Do you think it is something wrong? 



Thank you very much








Re: coefficient in logistic regression

2002-01-25 Thread Rich Ulrich

On 25 Jan 2002 08:13:41 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Claudiu D. Tufis)
wrote:

 Hi, 
  
 I have a multiple logistic regression. Among the predictors, I have 6
 variables that represent the dummies for an interaction term (the
 seventh is the reference category and is not included in analysis). I
 have obtained for five of these variables extremely large coefficients:
 exp(b) ranges from 90,000 to 166,000. 
  
 Could you please tell me if it is normal to have such values for exp(b)?
 Do you think it is something wrong? 
  

No, it is not normal.

Yes, something is wrong, if that is really what you have.

If you have more question, copy some output for us;
send some set-up lines; and mention what program.

Also, you posted many, many lines of HTML; 
please turn off that option if you can figure out how.

-- 
Rich Ulrich, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pitt.edu/~wpilib/index.html


=
Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the
problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at
  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=