Re: [Edu-sig] Microsoft's KPL

2005-10-06 Thread Arthur
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of David Handy


> And it doesn't  appear to be open source, either. (No source code
> available, and I  couldn't  find any explicit license, other than a
> statement that it was "freeware".

Nor - of course - is it cross platform.

I agree that is a relevant concern - but articulating why is somewhat
difficult.  I have little such concerns related to software for business use
- for example.  Nor am I unconcerned about the Open Source community's
tendency to be uncritical of efforts to distribute "educational software" -
based on little more than the merit of being cross platform and Open Source.

The best I can do is trying to make the analogy of the reaction to a release
of a scientific or academic paper that withheld citations and bibliography -
as confidential.  But of course -having them there does not make it a sound
scientific or academic paper.

I - like many others- welcome much of the disruption of the disruptive
technologies. On the other hand - disruption is disruption. And part of what
can and does get disrupted are sound common sense notions.

A company like Microsoft would be ashamed - based on more traditional
notions - of publicly promoting a position that the realization of the
potential of our children is part of their mission. The reality is they
spend enormous dollars promoting just such a position - with little general
reaction.  

If there was truth to such an assertion they should (and would) be satisfied
to let uninterested others find it, and promote it.

Quite possibly this concern/phobia/paranoia of mine is a tempest in a
teapot. A stage of be disruption will pass, and thinking around such issues
of children's education and the profit motive's of $multibillion business
enterprises will return to where common sense concerns regain their footing.

But I still see the jury as out.  So a few paragraphs sent into cyberspace
still seems worth the effort.

Art 



___
Edu-sig mailing list
Edu-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig


Re: [Edu-sig] Microsoft's KPL

2005-10-06 Thread Arthur


> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:edu-sig-
> To: 'David Handy'; 'Guido van Rossum'
> Cc: edu-sig@python.org
> Subject: Re: [Edu-sig] Microsoft's KPL
> 
> A company like Microsoft would be ashamed - based on more traditional
> notions - of publicly promoting a position that the realization of the
> potential of our children is part of their mission. 

I think I understated my position, a bit - in an effort to sound
"reasonable".

One should not expect a large corporation to have an emotion like "shame" -
that's clearly a form a anthropomorphism.

One should expect such an enterprise to act in a strategically sound manner.
And one might expect that it would be strategically unsound for an
organization like Microsoft or Disney or IBM or etc, and etc. to attempt to
promote themselves as having an altruistically based concern about
"learning" and "education".  Because it might well look ridiculous - and as
the movie producer in The Godfather says - "a man in my position can not
afford to be made to look ridiculous".

One would expect the most potent fire to come from the educational
community, the academic community.  

But groundwork has been laid.

It seems to me that the Microsofts and Disneys and etc. and etc. go forward
on these issues with some confidence that the fire coming from those
communities will be muted = at best. By understanding the current dynamics -
and survival modes - in those communities.

Yuck - its ugly.

Art


 






___
Edu-sig mailing list
Edu-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig


Re: [Edu-sig] Microsoft's KPL

2005-10-06 Thread Kirby Urner

Hi Arthur --

I really do try to understand your concerns about businesses touting their
efforts in the education arena, and how much that concerns you.

For me it's more about recruiting i.e. for Microsoft to keep a new
generation of talent working in Redmond, it needs to have appeal as an
employer, plus needs kids growing up to know something of the Microsoft way
and lore.  Windows, X-Box and such.  If all home schoolers use are Linux and
OS X, and same for a generous pie slice of school computer labs, that's
maybe not so good, in terms of attracting future talented, fun & friendly
coworkers.

But Microsoft is not so narrow as to only care about Windows or Office or
SQL Server.  The .NET technology, which we've been discussing in this
thread, is a promising platform for Python, and .NET has a footprint in
Linux, in the form of Mono.  The technology is, once again, cross platform,
and that has a lot of appeal (I can even run Mono on Windows -- have it on
my Toshiba A60 WinXP laptop in fact, left over from OSCON 2005).  

Having lots of options is generally good for client businesses such as mine.
We don't like getting locked in to pricing structures, not Microsoft's, not
anyone's. Open source often looks a lot less predatory to small businesses,
even if harder to grok.  The programmer you hire is surviving on the basis
of skills, not secret access to back door source code.  The code is in the
open.  Kung fu is on merit, not unfair advantage.

Python, for its part, tends to go cross-platform because of its VM
architecture.  Like Java, it's designed to leave interpretation of the low
level byte codes to something native, written in something fast.  C, Java
and C#/CIL have been the VM source languages so far -- at least those are
the ones I know a little about (I'm not so sure what's in that Nokia cell
phone).

I'd be concerned if just one or two big companies felt they could hijack and
control our curriculum, but having thousands upon millions of competing
firms hawking their education-relevance doesn't so far bother me.  Free
speech and all that.  If you want to position as a friendly-to-kids, yet
commercially minded education company, go right ahead.  There's nothing
sleazy about that in pure principle (you're just recruiting coworkers), and
sure, there're lots of opportunities to mess up.  Conclusion: there's no
promise you'll succeed, but you do have the right to try, is my attitude.

Kirby


___
Edu-sig mailing list
Edu-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig