Re: [Edu-sig] Basic dictionary question

2005-10-11 Thread Kirby Urner

I know there's an easy POV-Ray solution to create cross-eyed stereo, or
parallax, for free viewing (no glasses).  I've trafficked in those a lot, am
pretty good looking cross-eyed.  I might post my POV-Ray source over in
Synergeo and see if Brawley might re-render it for me, in stereo mode.  Or
better, I should restudy the technique and learn it meself.  Rrr.

Kirby


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of John Zelle
 Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 2:42 PM
 To: edu-sig@python.org
 Subject: Re: [Edu-sig] Basic dictionary question
 
 Kirby,
 
 Do you have a left and right stereo pair on that rendering? I just can't
 make heads or tails of it w/o true 3D :-)
 
 --John


___
Edu-sig mailing list
Edu-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig


Re: [Edu-sig] Microsoft's KPL

2005-10-11 Thread Arthur


 -Original Message-
 From: Kirby Urner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'Arthur'; edu-sig@python.org
 Subject: RE: [Edu-sig] Microsoft's KPL
 
  office in Switzerland - where the timekeeping action has always been  -
 
 hushed whisper
 
 Wait a minute, isn't Kirby secretly Swiss?  Or was that Bill Mahrer (HBO)?
 
click target = http://www.grunch.net/synergetics/urner.html; /
 
 Uh, ok, not so secret then.
 
 /hushed whisper

More ethnographic irrelevancy?  Great.  

;) (I think, see below)

The most accomplished and devoted clocksmith within my frame of reference is
an old friend, and high school teacher.

He would expose his industrial arts students to some of this craft and his
passion for it, until he was closed down and retrained into a craftless and
passionless Java teacher.

Which I guess is progress to the extent we insist on measuring progress in
terms of technological content, and weight technological content by year,
such that anything from 2000 and before is multiplied by Zero.

Note:

From Kirby's follow-up measure to my blowing my cool, I am suspecting that
he did not mean to berate me for offering the (irrelevant to the list)
information he had asked me to offer.  So I accept the probability that
there was a misunderstanding involved. 

But at least we learned the further irrelevant fact of the kind of thing of
which I am capable.  

But certainly not generally in response to criticism of the irrelevancy of
something I might post  - except should it come from someone who asked me to
post it.

Art
 


___
Edu-sig mailing list
Edu-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig


Re: [Edu-sig] Microsoft's KPL

2005-10-11 Thread Arthur


 -Original Message-
 From: Arthur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 -- except should it come from someone who asked me  to
 post it.
 

My irrelevancies are almost exclusively self-propelled.

So everyone who ever was - except for Kirby, once - is quite safe.

Art



___
Edu-sig mailing list
Edu-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig


Re: [Edu-sig] Microsoft's KPL

2005-10-11 Thread Kirby Urner
 From Kirby's follow-up measure to my blowing my cool, I am suspecting
 that he did not mean to berate me for offering the (irrelevant to the 
 list) information he had asked me to offer.  So I accept the probability 
 that there was a misunderstanding involved.

Exactly right.  I was saying:  look, your background as former CP
indoctrinated or whatever can't possibly be common knowledge to people on
this list (we simply mustn't presume this shared context/namespace) and so
please, in future, if at all possible, supply ample autobio and fleshing
out, especially when asking for moratoria or fatwahs, as we cannot possibly
be expected to just absorb such context from the ether, as if every
intellectual alive just knows what Marxism is about etc. etc.  

Forty years ago maybe, but not now.  Not even then (a lot of innocent people
got caught in the cross-fire and *still* don't know what hit 'em).

So what I'm saying is, again:  autobio is NOT irrelevant.  That's why I've
been offering mine, that's why I encourage you to keep offering yours.  My
not of interest to the list was not a put-down, just meant this is not
shared background, not everybody-knows stuff.  

You need to fill us in.  

You need to see that as your responsibility, and no one else's.  I think you
leave too much out, try too hard to be pithy.  We can't be expected to
track.

That's all I was saying.

Kirby


___
Edu-sig mailing list
Edu-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig