[Edu-sig] Re: mailman 3: howzitgoin?

2020-02-06 Thread Naomi Ceder
So it looks like both restructured text and markdown formatting is
supported how clever is that?

Hope this answers your question, Kirby.

Cheers,
Naomi

-- 
Naomi Ceder

@NaomiCeder • https://www.naomiceder.tech
https://www.manning.com/books/the-quick-python-book-third-edition
___
Edu-sig mailing list -- edu-sig@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to edu-sig-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/edu-sig.python.org/


[Edu-sig] Re: mailman 3: howzitgoin?

2020-02-06 Thread Naomi Ceder
Hmmm... so I'd assume that maybe mailman3 is rendering RST? If it is, then
the following should be formatted as code::
>>> 2 ** 200
1606938044258990275541962092341162602522202993782792835301376
>>>

On the other hand, maybe it's markdown? Then this should be a code block:
```
>>> 2 ** 200
1606938044258990275541962092341162602522202993782792835301376
>>>
```

Love an experiment... (and apologies everyone for the formatting test)

Cheers,
Naomi


On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 20:18, kirby urner  wrote:

>
> Testing:
>
> >>> 2**200 # (that's 2 to the 200th power in Python).
>
> The mailman 3 archive is rendering Python code rather poorly right?
>
> I archive more of my experience in this recent Youtube:
>
> https://youtu.be/rpAE_ogXKcE
>
> (recaps some recent threads, takes up the display of Python code through
> the archive)
>
> Kirby
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 12:50 PM kirby urner  wrote:
>
>> Looking back in the archive:
>>
>>
>> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/edu-sig@python.org/message/WE5WEZIMTZ7NB7FRZIPEAHLXJHQKGRKF/
>>
>> The rendering I get turns the double-star of Python exponentiation into
>> some kind of boldfacing, like we're in a wiki or using markdown or
>> something.
>>
>> The attachment shows the original content, but requires a download to
>> see. Is there a button-click way to redisplay / re-render a post in
>> original format?
>>
>> Nor is my Python source code showing up with indenting.  Do I need to
>> format in some new wiki way?
>>
>> What default settings do we have, to restore Python-friendliness, I
>> wonder.
>>
>> Kirby Urner
>> edu-sig listowner
>>
>> ___
> Edu-sig mailing list -- edu-sig@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to edu-sig-le...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/edu-sig.python.org/
>


-- 
Naomi Ceder

@NaomiCeder • https://www.naomiceder.tech
https://www.manning.com/books/the-quick-python-book-third-edition
___
Edu-sig mailing list -- edu-sig@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to edu-sig-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/edu-sig.python.org/


[Edu-sig] Re: mailman 3: howzitgoin?

2020-02-06 Thread kirby urner
Testing:

>>> 2**200 # (that's 2 to the 200th power in Python).

The mailman 3 archive is rendering Python code rather poorly right?

I archive more of my experience in this recent Youtube:

https://youtu.be/rpAE_ogXKcE

(recaps some recent threads, takes up the display of Python code through
the archive)

Kirby


On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 12:50 PM kirby urner  wrote:

> Looking back in the archive:
>
>
> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/edu-sig@python.org/message/WE5WEZIMTZ7NB7FRZIPEAHLXJHQKGRKF/
>
> The rendering I get turns the double-star of Python exponentiation into
> some kind of boldfacing, like we're in a wiki or using markdown or
> something.
>
> The attachment shows the original content, but requires a download to see.
> Is there a button-click way to redisplay / re-render a post in original
> format?
>
> Nor is my Python source code showing up with indenting.  Do I need to
> format in some new wiki way?
>
> What default settings do we have, to restore Python-friendliness, I
> wonder.
>
> Kirby Urner
> edu-sig listowner
>
>
___
Edu-sig mailing list -- edu-sig@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to edu-sig-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/edu-sig.python.org/