Re: [Ekiga-devel-list] New branch for Ekiga 3.00

2008-09-18 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Julien Puydt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Peter Robinson a écrit :

 I think uPnP support would be a pretty reasonable user facing change.
 While not bling, would make it much easier for a lot of people.

 No idea on that one :-)

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=337166

 And the move to the GTK Ridley update (deprecation of use of older
 libraries).

 We already pushed our demands for gtk+ (and glib) for 3.0... do we really
 want to push it higher up?

Not so much push it up higher (I think we've moved to 2.12?) but
rather move some of the libgnome related stuff to the new GTK features
instead

http://live.gnome.org/ProjectRidley

And comments on the bottom of this bug
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502541
___
Ekiga-devel-list mailing list
Ekiga-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-devel-list


Re: [Ekiga-devel-list] New branch for Ekiga 3.00

2008-09-18 Thread Julien Puydt

Peter Robinson a écrit :

Not so much push it up higher (I think we've moved to 2.12?) but
rather move some of the libgnome related stuff to the new GTK features
instead

http://live.gnome.org/ProjectRidley


I think we still use gnome_program_init, but the rest is gone already.

Snark
___
Ekiga-devel-list mailing list
Ekiga-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-devel-list


Re: [Ekiga-devel-list] New branch for Ekiga 3.00

2008-09-18 Thread Jan Schampera

Peter Robinson wrote:

On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Julien Puydt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Peter Robinson a écrit :

Not so much push it up higher (I think we've moved to 2.12?) but
rather move some of the libgnome related stuff to the new GTK features
instead

http://live.gnome.org/ProjectRidley

I think we still use gnome_program_init, but the rest is gone already.


We seem to still include bonobo here (below) but it doesn't seem to be
used (and the section for HAVE_GNOME looks very similar to the plain
GTK version), there looks to be half a dozen or so uses of gnome.h
still too for the program init as mentioned but also gnome_url_show.

src/gui/statusicon.cpp:#include libbonobo.h
src/gui/callbacks.cpp:#include libbonobo.h

Peter
___
Ekiga-devel-list mailing list
Ekiga-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-devel-list



The bug http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502541 is still open.

Also you can check why bonobo is in there. It fails to compile with 
DISABLED_DEPRECATED because they move _() [gettext] off to bonobo there, 
somehow.


--
This is my life - this is my net!
- Jan

___
Ekiga-devel-list mailing list
Ekiga-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-devel-list