Re: [Ekiga-devel-list] Useless shared linked libs in Ekiga 2.0.11
Kilian Krause a écrit : At a first glance this is due to configure demanding these to be added to LDFLAGS. If someone finds the time to go through these and strip it down to only the required ones before me, please feel free to do so. Isn't it pkg-config adding them? In that case, we can hardly do anything... Snark ___ Ekiga-devel-list mailing list Ekiga-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-devel-list
Re: [Ekiga-devel-list] Useless shared linked libs in Ekiga 2.0.11
Hi Julien, On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 11:34:48AM +0200, Julien Puydt wrote: Kilian Krause a écrit : At a first glance this is due to configure demanding these to be added to LDFLAGS. If someone finds the time to go through these and strip it down to only the required ones before me, please feel free to do so. Isn't it pkg-config adding them? In that case, we can hardly do anything... sadly it looks like this is a pkg-config issue of those packs. The question is whether we should work around this locally for now or just start feedking them the information.. I'll try to compile a list which of the packs does report which of those libs incorrectly. -- Best regards, Kilian signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Ekiga-devel-list mailing list Ekiga-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-devel-list
[Ekiga-devel-list] Useless shared linked libs in Ekiga 2.0.11
Hi guys, as the new dpkg does chatter a bit more about useful and not so useful depends declared by linking libraries that in fact aren't used, I can herewith present you with the output of the latest 2.0.11 release build: full build uselessly linked with: libaudiofile.so.0 (it uses none of its symbols). libSM.so.6 (it uses none of its symbols). libICE.so.6 (it uses none of its symbols). libbonoboui-2.so.0 (it uses none of its symbols). libgnomevfs-2.so.0 (it uses none of its symbols). libgnomecanvas-2.so.0 (it uses none of its symbols). libart_lgpl_2.so.2 (it uses none of its symbols). libatk-1.0.so.0 (it uses none of its symbols). libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 (it uses none of its symbols). libfontconfig.so.1 (it uses none of its symbols). libXext.so.6 (it uses none of its symbols). libXrender.so.1 (it uses none of its symbols). libXinerama.so.1 (it uses none of its symbols). libXi.so.6 (it uses none of its symbols). libXrandr.so.2 (it uses none of its symbols). libXcursor.so.1 (it uses none of its symbols). libXcomposite.so.1 (it uses none of its symbols). libXdamage.so.1 (it uses none of its symbols). libcairo.so.2 (it uses none of its symbols). libXfixes.so.3 (it uses none of its symbols). libpopt.so.0 (it uses none of its symbols). libxml2.so.2 (it uses none of its symbols). libgmodule-2.0.so.0 (it uses none of its symbols). librt.so.1 (it uses none of its symbols). libdl.so.2 (it uses none of its symbols). libpthread.so.0 (it uses none of its symbols). libgcc_s.so.1 (it uses none of its symbols). --disable-gnome variant uselessly linked with: libatk-1.0.so.0 (it uses none of its symbols). libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 (it uses none of its symbols). libfontconfig.so.1 (it uses none of its symbols). libXext.so.6 (it uses none of its symbols). libXrender.so.1 (it uses none of its symbols). libXinerama.so.1 (it uses none of its symbols). libXi.so.6 (it uses none of its symbols). libXrandr.so.2 (it uses none of its symbols). libXcursor.so.1 (it uses none of its symbols). libXcomposite.so.1 (it uses none of its symbols). libXdamage.so.1 (it uses none of its symbols). libcairo.so.2 (it uses none of its symbols). libXfixes.so.3 (it uses none of its symbols). libgmodule-2.0.so.0 (it uses none of its symbols). librt.so.1 (it uses none of its symbols). libxml2.so.2 (it uses none of its symbols). libdl.so.2 (it uses none of its symbols). libpthread.so.0 (it uses none of its symbols). libgcc_s.so.1 (it uses none of its symbols). At a first glance this is due to configure demanding these to be added to LDFLAGS. If someone finds the time to go through these and strip it down to only the required ones before me, please feel free to do so. -- Best regards, Kilian signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Ekiga-devel-list mailing list Ekiga-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-devel-list
