Re: [Ekiga-list] Is the ekiga stun server down?

2008-08-26 Thread Sébastien Mazy
Hi,

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:31 PM, Allen T Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there another server that I can connect to?

Any STUN server should work. Try stunserver.org.

Cheers,

-- 
Sébastien Mazy
___
ekiga-list mailing list
ekiga-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list

Re: [Ekiga-list] Yet another "406 not acceptable" thread

2008-08-25 Thread Sébastien Mazy
Hi Damien,

On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Damien Sandras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I changed to 606. 488 is related to media formats in general.

Wow, this is reactivity. Many thanks!

Off-topic:
I'm curious to know why you chose to reject private IP addresses. It
doesn't prevent one from putting calls. Were you fed up with "I can't
received calls" support resquests?

Cheers,

-- 
Sébastien Mazy
___
ekiga-list mailing list
ekiga-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list

Re: [Ekiga-list] Yet another "406 not acceptable" thread

2008-08-25 Thread Sébastien Mazy
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Damien Sandras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And what error code would you suggest ?

How about 488 "not acceptable here"?
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3261#section-21.4.26

-- 
Sébastien Mazy
___
ekiga-list mailing list
ekiga-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list

[Ekiga-list] Yet another "406 not acceptable" thread

2008-08-24 Thread Sébastien Mazy
Hi,

I hope it's the right place to talk about ekiga.net service (not
software), otherwise I'm sorry for it.

ekiga.net registrar responds with "406 NOT ACCEPTABLE" error to
REGISTER requests which contain a private IP address in their Via or
Contact header fields. While it's a choice to reject such requests, is
the 406 error the most suitable for this case? I took a look at the
RFC3261 definition [1] in order to understand what this error really
meant and what I read (bad Accept header) doesn't really seem to
match: "don't want to accept REGISTER message with private IP".

What do you think? Would it be possible to change the error code for a
more suitable one? (just asking, take no offense)

[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3261#section-21.4.7

Cheers,

-- 
Sébastien Mazy
___
ekiga-list mailing list
ekiga-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list