[Elecraft] Fwd: Re: Curious -- why is KXFL3 roofing filter an option on KX3 ?

2014-04-11 Thread Uwe Hermanns
...I have a great problem with AM-Breaktrough and I have to switch to 8kHz
ZF-Shift. So most of my operation time my KXFL3 is not in use :-(

73 de Uwe, DL4AC
 -- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --
Von: "Rick Tavan N6XI" 
Datum: 12.04.2014 01:04
Betreff: Re: [Elecraft] Curious -- why is KXFL3 roofing filter an option on
KX3 ?
An: "Phil Hystad" 
Cc: "Elecraft List" 

If all of your operating is casual chatting, on uncrowded bands, with poor
antennas, then the KXFL3 won't do much at all for you. Its primary function
is to prevent DSP overload from very strong, adjacent signals and you won't
experience that much if at all. If much of your operating is serious DXing
or contesting on crowded bands with good antennas and active nearby
neighbor stations, you will often encounter those strong, close-in signals
and the KXFL3 will help a lot. Somewhere between those extremes of strength
and crowding is the threshold. I got the filter even though it is often
unnecessary.

/Rick N6XI


On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Phil Hystad  wrote:

> I have a curiosity question.  Why is the KXFL3 roofing filter an option on
> the KX3?  I mean, why is it not a built-in feature of the KX3?  First, I
> already own a KX3 with the KXFL3 filter so I am not asking this in order
to
> choose to buy or not.  Caveat:  I am also a neophyte (philistine,
ignorant,
> or troglodyte) in this sort of radio technology and still in learner mode.
>
> But, it seems to me that the KXFL3 roofing filter is almost required with
> a radio as nice as the KX3.  Without it, as I understand the function, any
> crowded band interval like a pileup or close-in CW signals and such would
> render a KX3 (without the roofing filter) with less than the usual
Elecraft
> stellar RX performance.
>
> My guess, and this is only a wild guess, is that maybe the option leads
> this space open to future improved roofing filters?  Or, maybe even leave
> it open to a 3rd party market supplied filter (although, I think this
> filter is particularly different from other typical 3rd party filters).
>
> 73, phil, K7PEH
>
>
>
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to rta...@gmail.com
>



--
Rick Tavan N6XI
Truckee, CA
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to uwe.dl...@gmail.com
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] [OT] [OT] [OT] K2a

2014-04-11 Thread Michael Poteet
Having noticed the recent semiannual K4 speculation I wanted to offer
speculation in a different direction.

 

The K2 was originally offered as a true kit that, upon completion, provided
a radio capable of both home use and trail use.

 

The trail/remote and home use capabilities have been supplanted by the other
radios in the Elecraft stable.

 

The only really unique feature of the K2 is that it is a true kit; that
said, it is a bit behind the curve in tech plus it is a major PITB to
"align".

 

I would like to see Elecraft revisit the K2 (well, not exactly):

 

 

01) Keep it a kit as much as possible.  So maybe RF and AF sections could be
kits (at least partially).

 

02) Fully assembled as an option.

 

03) Make the "middle" a high performance SDR; factory assembled and aligned.

 

04) 6 KHz band pass filter in the first IF with the DSP doing the remaining
filtering functions.

 

05) Include a 12 volt to (say) 60 volt conversion to power a "high voltage"
RF section.

 

06) 100 watts output.

 

07) No FM but add 6 meters.

 

08) Include Digital Voice as a mode.  Pick one of the Open Source
implementations.  Make it an "App"; Elecraft would maintain the latest
source code and latest "compiled" App; anyone who wished could modify and
install their own version; might be an area where Amateurs could contribute
something meaningful.

 

09) Competent single receiver (with RIT) but not necessarily (in Japanese
radio jargon) "Competition Grade".

 

10) Very competent transmit (with XIT): no splatter, no clicks, no noise.

 

11) Put it all inside a "big" box in the style of the best looking piece of
Ham Radio gear ever designed: the Collins 75A4.

 

12) Real "Collins" style knobs , real "bat handle" toggle switches.

 

13) Only a few radio functions need constant, easy access, tie those to the
big knobs and toggle switches.  

 

14) Note the switches and controls would only tell a DSP or MCU to take some
action.  I'm not talking multi-pole, multi-gang rotary switches.

 

15) Preassembled wire bundles to attach the front panel controls and
switches to the main unit (with quick disconnect to allow easy removal).

 

16) Add a 5-inch color touch screen display (like my Garmin GPS) in the
middle of the front panel with a nice size, high inertia tuning knob for
freq control.

 

17) Put the ancillary functions on the (multi-page) touch screen.

 

18) The touch screen pages should be tab accessible; with user definable
pages.

 

19) Embed this all inside the "75A4 Cabinet": nice size box, mostly air
inside but with room to add additional features (maybe even a decent
speaker). 

 

20) This is not meant to be a DXpedition, mountaintop, contest box; just a
desktop system that you could turn on with a (toggle) switch, select your
band with a rotary switch, select your mode with a rotary switch, touch the
tab on the touch screen to verify your audio/keyer/data settings then kick
back and operate.  Toggle switches for AGC On/Off, AGC Fast/Slow, Noise
Blanker On/Off, Noise Reduction On/Off, rotary controls for receive bandpass
width and shift, so on. Touch screen pages to set/adjust the characteristics
of the Noise Reduction, Noise Blanker, AGC, etc. Switched LCD meter to
provide S-meter, power, audio level, whatever.  

 

 

 

OK, OK, OK.I know it can never happen:  

 

1) No one would want one.

2) It would be too big.

3) It wouldn't be big enough.

4) Elecraft doesn't have the financial resources to develop such a device.  

5) Purchase price would be too high.  

6) Besides it would take engineering talent away from the development of the
K4, the 1500 watt solid state amp, the VHF to near-infrared transceiver, the
Elecraft EPad, etc. 

 

 

But, it would be a really neat rig: very "Retro" look with a high tech
heart.

 

Mike W5FTD

 

 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2 and panadapter(s)

2014-04-11 Thread Thomas Taylor
On Sat, 12 Apr 2014 01:12:29 +
Robert G Strickland  wrote:

> I'd like to hear from anyone who has worked out a panadapter function 
> with the K2. Please respond off list. Thanks much

And copy to list for the rest of us!

Thanks, Tom  KG7CFC

-- 
The foolish man seeks happiness in the distance. The wise man grows it under
his feet.
  -  James Oppenheim

^^  --...  ...--  / -.-  --.  --...  -.-.  ..-.  -.-.


Tom Taylor  KG7CFC
openSUSE 13.1 (64-bit), Kernel 3.11.6-4-default,
KDE 4.11.2, AMD Phenom X4 955, GeForce GTX 550 Ti (Nvidia 325.15)
16GB RAM -- 3x1.5TB sata2 -- 128GB-SSD
FF 27.0, claws-mail 3.9.2
registered linux user 263467
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] First contact today was A35V on KX3 picnic table portable

2014-04-11 Thread lane zeitler
Got the KX3 about a week ago. First contact was today, portable, I was sitting 
next to the bay on a picnic table (salt water, here on the Navy base in 
Yokosuka Japan) with a 17ft replacement tent pole I ordered on Amazon for $38 
as my 20 to 10 mtr vertical. The new "vertical" is tie wrapped to a 3 ft high 
chain link fence. Two 17 ft radials are laid out. 50 ohm coax as the feed, 
about six feet long straight to the KX3. Built in auto tuner tunes it easily to 
a 1:1 match on 20 to 10 meters. It will load on 40 but the final swr is high 
and did not try 80 or 160 or even 6 mtrs yet. We will leave the area and return 
back to the states in JUL so not going crazy with antennas here.and all of 
my operations here will be picnic portable until we leave.


Worked A35V on 12 meters ssb, I was xmitting 4 watts into the tent pole 
vertical. Took a few calls but got him with my JA call of JH1JCM/QRP.

My Eneloop batteries were straight out of the packaginghad not even did a 
charge yet but the KX3 indicated the voltage was 8.7 so I figured I would give 
it a try. They worked.


There are a lot of menu driven options with this rig and overall I prefer a 
simpler rig such as the Argo VI which I almost bought but hopefully over the 
next few weeks of very casual operating I will get to know the knob functions 
better. Impressed with the build quality and the display is awesome. The CMP 
seems to have a major positive impact on SSB. 


The SSB monitor sounds weird thoughwhen I engage the SSB monitor circuit it 
sounds like it is being processed digitally and has that "in the cave" dsp 
sound to itdo not like the way the monitor sounds so I must be doing 
something wrong.

Still slowly figuring this rig out. Eneloops are charging now off of my Astron 
SS30. Expect to have full charge in 10 hours. Will see how long they last 
before needing charging again.

Bought the optional paddle but have not hooked it up yet. More to follow.


LCDR Lane Zeitler
Forward Deployed
US Naval Hospital 

Yokosuka Japan
JH1JCM
Ku7i
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Rotten Signals

2014-04-11 Thread Phil Kane
On 4/11/2014 3:43 PM, F5vjc wrote:

> Well I believe it is better to 'close talk' most microphones in a
> typical Ham shack environment, 2 inches typically.

Not if you are shouting into it.

For PSK which I use my K2 for, there is a nice monitoring program called
PSKmeter that gives a scope-like presentation of the waveform.  It
operates in real time - in a window on the computer screen - and makes
it very easy to see if there's too much ALC or audio input.
-- --
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane
Elecraft K2/100   s/n 5402

>From a Clearing in the Silicon Forest
Beaverton (Washington County) Oregon
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Just got shipment alert!

2014-04-11 Thread Fred Jensen

On 4/11/2014 6:36 PM, David Cole wrote:

My K3 arrives on the 15th. Can't wait!

Go slow David, do the inventory.  Likelihood of missing things is very 
low but the big advantage it gives you is knowledge of all the parts.


73,

Fred K6DGW
- Northern California Contest Club
- CU in the 2014 Cal QSO Party 4-5 Oct 2014
- www.cqp.org

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Utility 1.14.4.10 beta test version available on our FTP site

2014-04-11 Thread Bob
None yet.  Back on February 24th Wayne mentioned here on the forum that it was 
being worked on.


That posting pasted below:

Hang in there a little longer.

73,
Bob
K2TK   ex KN2TKR (1956) & K2TKR

Yes, we're definitely working on a way to move the crystal frequency. (This 
applies to both the KAT500 and the KXPA100.) I'll post again once we have 
modification kits ready.

73,
Wayne
N6KR



On 4/11/2014 11:26 AM, Stan Gibbs, KR7C wrote:

Is there a hardware mod that could be made that would shift the oscillator
out of the 10m band?  That would eliminate the problem altogether, allow the
firmware to be simplified and greatly improve the communications
reliability.




-
73, Stan - KR7C
--



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] Just got shipment alert!

2014-04-11 Thread David Cole
My K3 arrives on the 15th. Can't wait!
-- 
Thanks and 73's,
For equipment, and software setups and reviews see:
www.nk7z.net
for MixW support see;
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/mixw/info
for Dopplergram information see:
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/dopplergram/info
for MM-SSTV see:
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/MM-SSTV/info



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] K2 and panadapter(s)

2014-04-11 Thread Robert G Strickland
I'd like to hear from anyone who has worked out a panadapter function 
with the K2. Please respond off list. Thanks much

--
Robert G Strickland, PhD ABPH - KE2WY
rc...@verizon.net.usa
Syracuse, New York, USA
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Rotten Signals

2014-04-11 Thread Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft

Folks - This thread was closed yesterday in the interest of reducing list 
overload.

Eric
elecraft.com

On 4/11/2014 2:10 PM, Phil Kane wrote:

On 4/9/2014 11:26 PM, F5vjc wrote:


This amazingly seems to be of no consequence to the majority as I very
rarely hear bad audio or CW clicks being brought to the attention of the
offending op.

Just this week I had to admonish one of our net participants who fancies
himself as an electronic expert to back off about a foot from his
microphone so that his speech would be intelligible.  His remedy was to
turn his compression down to zero.   It was a good start.


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] KX3: thermal frequency drift

2014-04-11 Thread Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft
The XG3 is perfect for this calibration. Freq is not critical as ling as its 
close to 50. Our XG50 is actually a little below 50 Mhz. (I think it used the 
ref oscillator module from the K3.)


Eric
elecraft.com

On 4/11/2014 1:39 PM, Edward R Cole wrote:
It was suggested I do the Temp Compensation Procedure.  Unfortunately I do not 
have a stable 50-MHz signal source. However I did run the Reference Frequency 
Calibration using my XG3.  Call this "Part Two":


I sampled the RF output of the XG3 with my counter and also input that to the 
KX3 for the Calib.  This required running at 0 dBm to inject strong enough 
signal for the counter (approx -3 dBm).  I turned on the ATT for the KX3 to 
keep input from overdriving.  Got about S9 signal level.


I got it adjusted to within about 2-Hz.  The XG3 drifts approx +/- 2 Hz so 
difficult to set the Ref*Frequency using it.  But that eliminated most of the 
38 Hz offset I saw last night.  Running the Tx at 5w afterward drift was in 
the range of 0 to +7 Hz for a 50-second key down run.  The drift is not steady 
in one direction so average error is probably in the neighborhood of +5 Hz 
with 5-Hz uncertainty in the measurement.  Crude but gives a ballpark idea 
what to expect.


Today's measurements were all with new heat sink installed.  Temp Comp. 
probably would lower these numbers a bit.


I might try running my K3 as signal source for Temp Comp. if it holds more 
stable then the XG3 at 50-MHz.  I am using the EXREF so it may be better?


73, Ed - KL7UW
http://www.kl7uw.com
"Kits made by KL7UW"
Dubus Mag business:
dubus...@gmail.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to elist_c...@elecraft.com


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] Using K3 remote with Steppir antenna

2014-04-11 Thread wb5xx
I would appreciate it if someone who is using their K3 remote with the Remote 
Rig boxes and their Steppir 3el would contact me offline.I have a couple of 
problems I need help with.Qrz Email is good.

Thanks,

George wb5xx
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] PR6 Hookup

2014-04-11 Thread Cady, Fred
HI Dwight,
You hook it to Bypass In.  In order to use the receive antenna, the PR6 needs 
to be turned off.  If you are using DIGOUT1 to control the PR6, it may not be 
turning off when DIGOUT1 is off is you have the KAT500 and KPA500 and are using 
the KPAK3AUX cables.
Cheers and 73,
Fred KE7X

"The Elecraft K3: Design, Configuration and Operation 2nd ed"
"The Elecraft KX3 - Going for the summit"
www.ke7x.com or www.lulu.com 
KPA500 and KAT500 Quick Set Up Guide
http://www.ke7x.com/home/k-line-introduction-and-set-up-guide
(Coming soon: "The Elecraft KPA500 and KAT500 - the K-Line Dream Station")


> -Original Message-
> From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-
> boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of DGB
> Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 3:21 PM
> To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> Subject: [Elecraft] PR6 Hookup
> 
> when hooking up the PR6, which do I connect my 160m rcv antenna to, the
> bypass out or in?
> 
> tnx 73 Dwight NS9I
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to fc...@ece.montana.edu
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Curious -- why is KXFL3 roofing filter an option on KX3 ?

2014-04-11 Thread Rick Tavan N6XI
If all of your operating is casual chatting, on uncrowded bands, with poor
antennas, then the KXFL3 won't do much at all for you. Its primary function
is to prevent DSP overload from very strong, adjacent signals and you won't
experience that much if at all. If much of your operating is serious DXing
or contesting on crowded bands with good antennas and active nearby
neighbor stations, you will often encounter those strong, close-in signals
and the KXFL3 will help a lot. Somewhere between those extremes of strength
and crowding is the threshold. I got the filter even though it is often
unnecessary.

/Rick N6XI


On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Phil Hystad  wrote:

> I have a curiosity question.  Why is the KXFL3 roofing filter an option on
> the KX3?  I mean, why is it not a built-in feature of the KX3?  First, I
> already own a KX3 with the KXFL3 filter so I am not asking this in order to
> choose to buy or not.  Caveat:  I am also a neophyte (philistine, ignorant,
> or troglodyte) in this sort of radio technology and still in learner mode.
>
> But, it seems to me that the KXFL3 roofing filter is almost required with
> a radio as nice as the KX3.  Without it, as I understand the function, any
> crowded band interval like a pileup or close-in CW signals and such would
> render a KX3 (without the roofing filter) with less than the usual Elecraft
> stellar RX performance.
>
> My guess, and this is only a wild guess, is that maybe the option leads
> this space open to future improved roofing filters?  Or, maybe even leave
> it open to a 3rd party market supplied filter (although, I think this
> filter is particularly different from other typical 3rd party filters).
>
> 73, phil, K7PEH
>
>
>
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to rta...@gmail.com
>



-- 
Rick Tavan N6XI
Truckee, CA
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Rotten Signals

2014-04-11 Thread F5vjc
Well I believe it is better to 'close talk' most microphones in a typical
Ham shack environment, 2 inches typically. Reduces background noise and
reverberation.
Most of us are not operating in a broadcast studio acoustically dead
environment.
Of course,  adjust Mic gain and Compression to suit, and please, please no
HEAVY Bass Eq it's totally wasted communications power and sounds rather
NAFF IMHO.
And, 3kHz audio BW is Plenty wide for our purposes.
Compression is good, used properly.

Expert opinions please?

73,  F5VJC


On 11 April 2014 23:10, Phil Kane  wrote:

> On 4/9/2014 11:26 PM, F5vjc wrote:
>
> > This amazingly seems to be of no consequence to the majority as I very
> > rarely hear bad audio or CW clicks being brought to the attention of the
> > offending op.
>
> Just this week I had to admonish one of our net participants who fancies
> himself as an electronic expert to back off about a foot from his
> microphone so that his speech would be intelligible.  His remedy was to
> turn his compression down to zero.   It was a good start.
> --
>
> 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane
> Elecraft K2/100   s/n 5402
>
> From a Clearing in the Silicon Forest
> Beaverton (Washington County) Oregon
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to foxfive@gmail.com
>
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] KX3: thermal frequency drift

2014-04-11 Thread Matt VK2RQ
You are right, you can't use WWV for the temperature compensation data 
collection procedure itself. However, we are talking about the reference 
calibration that you must perform after the temperature compensation data 
collection -- for that, you need a precisely known frequency reference. Ed 
below said he was using his XG3 for that, but it was drifting around 2Hz or so. 
I was saying that you can do better than that by zero-beating with WWV, even 
with Doppler shift error. Note that when I say "zero beat", I don't mean tuning 
the carrier down to "0Hz" (that topic has been beaten to death, so I won't 
repeat it here :-) ).

73,
Matt VK2RQ

> On 12 Apr 2014, at 8:03 am, Oliver Dröse  wrote:
> 
> 
> As you need to do the extend temp procedure at +/- 50 MHz that's no option, 
> Matt.
> 
> @Ed:
> The K3 will work fine as source for the ext. temp. procedure. Just turn it 
> down to lowest power or use the transverter out port.
> 
> 73, Olli - DH8BQA
> 
> Contest, DX & radio projects: http://www.dh8bqa.de
> 
> 
> 
> Am 11.04.2014 23:58, schrieb Matt VK2RQ:
>> You are probably better off zero-beating to WWV. You should easily be able 
>> to get within 500mHz or less.
>> 
>> 73,
>> Matt VK2RQ
>> 
>>> On 12 Apr 2014, at 6:39 am, Edward R Cole  wrote:
>>> 
>>> It was suggested I do the Temp Compensation Procedure.  Unfortunately I do 
>>> not have a stable 50-MHz signal source. However I did run the Reference 
>>> Frequency Calibration using my XG3.  Call this "Part Two":
>>> 
>>> I sampled the RF output of the XG3 with my counter and also input that to 
>>> the KX3 for the Calib.  This required running at 0 dBm to inject strong 
>>> enough signal for the counter (approx -3 dBm).  I turned on the ATT for the 
>>> KX3 to keep input from overdriving.  Got about S9 signal level.
>>> 
>>> I got it adjusted to within about 2-Hz.  The XG3 drifts approx +/- 2 Hz so 
>>> difficult to set the Ref*Frequency using it.  But that eliminated most of 
>>> the 38 Hz offset I saw last night.  Running the Tx at 5w afterward drift 
>>> was in the range of 0 to +7 Hz for a 50-second key down run.  The drift is 
>>> not steady in one direction so average error is probably in the 
>>> neighborhood of +5 Hz with 5-Hz uncertainty in the measurement.  Crude but 
>>> gives a ballpark idea what to expect.
>>> 
>>> Today's measurements were all with new heat sink installed.  Temp Comp. 
>>> probably would lower these numbers a bit.
>>> 
>>> I might try running my K3 as signal source for Temp Comp. if it holds more 
>>> stable then the XG3 at 50-MHz.  I am using the EXREF so it may be better?
>>> 
>>> 73, Ed - KL7UW
>>> http://www.kl7uw.com
>>>"Kits made by KL7UW"
>>> Dubus Mag business:
>>>dubus...@gmail.com
>>> 
>>> __
>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>> 
>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>> Message delivered to matt.vk...@gmail.com
>> __
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>> 
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to dro...@necg.de
>> 
> 
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to matt.vk...@gmail.com
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] KX3: thermal frequency drift

2014-04-11 Thread Oliver Dröse


As you need to do the extend temp procedure at +/- 50 MHz that's no 
option, Matt.


@Ed:
The K3 will work fine as source for the ext. temp. procedure. Just turn 
it down to lowest power or use the transverter out port.


73, Olli - DH8BQA

Contest, DX & radio projects: http://www.dh8bqa.de


 


Am 11.04.2014 23:58, schrieb Matt VK2RQ:

You are probably better off zero-beating to WWV. You should easily be able to 
get within 500mHz or less.

73,
Matt VK2RQ


On 12 Apr 2014, at 6:39 am, Edward R Cole  wrote:

It was suggested I do the Temp Compensation Procedure.  Unfortunately I do not have a 
stable 50-MHz signal source. However I did run the Reference Frequency Calibration using 
my XG3.  Call this "Part Two":

I sampled the RF output of the XG3 with my counter and also input that to the 
KX3 for the Calib.  This required running at 0 dBm to inject strong enough 
signal for the counter (approx -3 dBm).  I turned on the ATT for the KX3 to 
keep input from overdriving.  Got about S9 signal level.

I got it adjusted to within about 2-Hz.  The XG3 drifts approx +/- 2 Hz so 
difficult to set the Ref*Frequency using it.  But that eliminated most of the 
38 Hz offset I saw last night.  Running the Tx at 5w afterward drift was in the 
range of 0 to +7 Hz for a 50-second key down run.  The drift is not steady in 
one direction so average error is probably in the neighborhood of +5 Hz with 
5-Hz uncertainty in the measurement.  Crude but gives a ballpark idea what to 
expect.

Today's measurements were all with new heat sink installed.  Temp Comp. 
probably would lower these numbers a bit.

I might try running my K3 as signal source for Temp Comp. if it holds more 
stable then the XG3 at 50-MHz.  I am using the EXREF so it may be better?

73, Ed - KL7UW
http://www.kl7uw.com
"Kits made by KL7UW"
Dubus Mag business:
dubus...@gmail.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to matt.vk...@gmail.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to dro...@necg.de



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] KX3: thermal frequency drift

2014-04-11 Thread Matt VK2RQ
You are probably better off zero-beating to WWV. You should easily be able to 
get within 500mHz or less.

73,
Matt VK2RQ

> On 12 Apr 2014, at 6:39 am, Edward R Cole  wrote:
> 
> It was suggested I do the Temp Compensation Procedure.  Unfortunately I do 
> not have a stable 50-MHz signal source. However I did run the Reference 
> Frequency Calibration using my XG3.  Call this "Part Two":
> 
> I sampled the RF output of the XG3 with my counter and also input that to the 
> KX3 for the Calib.  This required running at 0 dBm to inject strong enough 
> signal for the counter (approx -3 dBm).  I turned on the ATT for the KX3 to 
> keep input from overdriving.  Got about S9 signal level.
> 
> I got it adjusted to within about 2-Hz.  The XG3 drifts approx +/- 2 Hz so 
> difficult to set the Ref*Frequency using it.  But that eliminated most of the 
> 38 Hz offset I saw last night.  Running the Tx at 5w afterward drift was in 
> the range of 0 to +7 Hz for a 50-second key down run.  The drift is not 
> steady in one direction so average error is probably in the neighborhood of 
> +5 Hz with 5-Hz uncertainty in the measurement.  Crude but gives a ballpark 
> idea what to expect.
> 
> Today's measurements were all with new heat sink installed.  Temp Comp. 
> probably would lower these numbers a bit.
> 
> I might try running my K3 as signal source for Temp Comp. if it holds more 
> stable then the XG3 at 50-MHz.  I am using the EXREF so it may be better?
> 
> 73, Ed - KL7UW
> http://www.kl7uw.com
>"Kits made by KL7UW"
> Dubus Mag business:
>dubus...@gmail.com
> 
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to matt.vk...@gmail.com
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Utility 1.14.4.10 beta test version available on our FTP site

2014-04-11 Thread Martin Kratoska

Thanks a million, Eric!

73,
Martin, OK1RR

Dne 11.4.2014 21:26, Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft napsal(a):

IT takes us a little longer to get the Mac and Linux versions out after
the Windows utility is fully tested.

Eric
elecraft.com

On 4/11/2014 11:18 AM, Martin Kratoska wrote:

Windows only, grrr.

73,
Martin, OK1RR
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to elist_c...@elecraft.com





__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] PR6 Hookup

2014-04-11 Thread DGB
when hooking up the PR6, which do I connect my 160m rcv antenna to, the 
bypass out or in?


tnx 73 Dwight NS9I
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Rotten Signals

2014-04-11 Thread Phil Kane
On 4/9/2014 11:26 PM, F5vjc wrote:

> This amazingly seems to be of no consequence to the majority as I very
> rarely hear bad audio or CW clicks being brought to the attention of the
> offending op.

Just this week I had to admonish one of our net participants who fancies
himself as an electronic expert to back off about a foot from his
microphone so that his speech would be intelligible.  His remedy was to
turn his compression down to zero.   It was a good start.
-- 

73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane
Elecraft K2/100   s/n 5402

>From a Clearing in the Silicon Forest
Beaverton (Washington County) Oregon
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] KX3: thermal frequency drift

2014-04-11 Thread Phil Genera
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Bruce Beford wrote:

> > It was suggested I do the Temp Compensation Procedure.  Unfortunately
> > I do not have a stable 50-MHz signal source.
>
> Ed,
> I did mine using the 5th harmonic from my Trimble Thunderbolt GPSDO. I
> think
> I used about 60dB of attentuation between the oscillator and the rig, I
> don't recall exactly. If you have a precision 10 MHz reference (and I
> believe you do), you could use that similarly.
>
> 73,
> Bruce N1RX
>
>
I did the same without any attenuation, and both kx3s survived :).

-- 
Phil
kj6pon
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] KX3: thermal frequency drift

2014-04-11 Thread Bruce Beford
> It was suggested I do the Temp Compensation Procedure.  Unfortunately 
> I do not have a stable 50-MHz signal source.

Ed,
I did mine using the 5th harmonic from my Trimble Thunderbolt GPSDO. I think
I used about 60dB of attentuation between the oscillator and the rig, I
don't recall exactly. If you have a precision 10 MHz reference (and I
believe you do), you could use that similarly.

73,
Bruce N1RX


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] KX3: thermal frequency drift

2014-04-11 Thread Edward R Cole
It was suggested I do the Temp Compensation Procedure.  Unfortunately 
I do not have a stable 50-MHz signal source. However I did run the 
Reference Frequency Calibration using my XG3.  Call this "Part Two":


I sampled the RF output of the XG3 with my counter and also input 
that to the KX3 for the Calib.  This required running at 0 dBm to 
inject strong enough signal for the counter (approx -3 dBm).  I 
turned on the ATT for the KX3 to keep input from overdriving.  Got 
about S9 signal level.


I got it adjusted to within about 2-Hz.  The XG3 drifts approx +/- 2 
Hz so difficult to set the Ref*Frequency using it.  But that 
eliminated most of the 38 Hz offset I saw last night.  Running the Tx 
at 5w afterward drift was in the range of 0 to +7 Hz for a 50-second 
key down run.  The drift is not steady in one direction so average 
error is probably in the neighborhood of +5 Hz with 5-Hz uncertainty 
in the measurement.  Crude but gives a ballpark idea what to expect.


Today's measurements were all with new heat sink installed.  Temp 
Comp. probably would lower these numbers a bit.


I might try running my K3 as signal source for Temp Comp. if it holds 
more stable then the XG3 at 50-MHz.  I am using the EXREF so it may be better?


73, Ed - KL7UW
http://www.kl7uw.com
"Kits made by KL7UW"
Dubus Mag business:
dubus...@gmail.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Curious -- why is KXFL3 roofing filter an option on KX3 ?

2014-04-11 Thread Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft

Hi George,

This is a precision matched phase I-Q filter. Its a key component of the KX3s 
excellent performance. No different than if you were ordering a precision 
crystal as we use in the K3.


These parts are matched and selected here. We can supply matched sets if they 
ever are needed. We have yet to see one fail. (The chance of failure of these 
caps is miniscule.)


73,

Eric
elecraft.com

On 4/11/2014 9:26 AM, george fritkin wrote:

Matching 0.1% capacitors?  What kind of a design is this that requires such 
tolerances ?  This make maintenance almost impossible.
  
George, W6GF

On Thursday, April 10, 2014 9:31 PM, Wayne Burdick  wrote:
   
Hi Phil,


The roofing filter module (KXFL3) is expensive for us to manufacture because of 
the extremely tight tolerances on the capacitors (0.1% in some cases). They 
have to be matched by hand.

We didn't want to pass this cost on to all KX3 users, since many of them don't 
require the roofing filters. Even without them, the KX3's receiver performance 
would fall into the top 6 or so radios as measured by Sherwood Engineering 
(http://www.sherweng.com/table.html).

73,
Wayne
N6KR


On Apr 10, 2014, at 7:56 AM, Phil Hystad  wrote:


I have a curiosity question.  Why is the KXFL3 roofing filter an option on the 
KX3?  I mean, why is it not a built-in feature of the KX3?  First, I already 
own a KX3 with the KXFL3 filter so I am not asking this in order to choose to 
buy or not.  Caveat:  I am also a neophyte (philistine, ignorant, or 
troglodyte) in this sort of radio technology and still in learner mode.

But, it seems to me that the KXFL3 roofing filter is almost required with a 
radio as nice as the KX3.  Without it, as I understand the function, any 
crowded band interval like a pileup or close-in CW signals and such would 
render a KX3 (without the roofing filter) with less than the usual Elecraft 
stellar RX performance.

My guess, and this is only a wild guess, is that maybe the option leads this 
space open to future improved roofing filters?  Or, maybe even leave it open to 
a 3rd party market supplied filter (although, I think this filter is 
particularly different from other typical 3rd party filters).

73, phil, K7PEH



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net/
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to georgefrit...@yahoo.com
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to elist_c...@elecraft.com


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Utility 1.14.4.10 beta test version available on our FTP site

2014-04-11 Thread Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft
IT takes us a little longer to get the Mac and Linux versions out after the 
Windows utility is fully tested.


Eric
elecraft.com

On 4/11/2014 11:18 AM, Martin Kratoska wrote:

Windows only, grrr.

73,
Martin, OK1RR
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to elist_c...@elecraft.com


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] test message only

2014-04-11 Thread Bruce Beford
email trouble, testing settings.

Bruce N1RX

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Utility 1.14.4.10 beta test version available on our FTP site

2014-04-11 Thread Martin Kratoska

Windows only, grrr.

73,
Martin, OK1RR
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Anti Static Mats

2014-04-11 Thread ke9uw
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antistatic_agent




-
Chuck, KE9UW
--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Anti-Static-Mats-tp7586727p7587021.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Curious -- why is KXFL3 roofing filter an option on KX3 ?

2014-04-11 Thread Wayne Burdick
Hi George,

Tight matching is required in the roofing filters because of their impact on 
the I and Q receive channels. This is not unique to Elecraft's application. By 
matching the gain and phase within the channels, we suppress image responses in 
hardware, simplifying the task of the DSP after the A-to-D converter.

Fortunately the capacitors come on SMD reels and have fairly tight tolerance 
within batches. So we sort them the same way we do crystals.

But yes, it would be difficult for a customer to repair their own KXFL3 board, 
should it involve the tight-tolerance parts. On the other hand, the board is 
extremely unlikely to fail, and it's a small removable module that can easily 
be replaced if necessary. I don't know of any cases of this yet.

73,
Wayne
N6KR

On Apr 11, 2014, at 9:26 AM, george fritkin  wrote:

> Matching 0.1% capacitors?  What kind of a design is this that requires such 
> tolerances ?  This make maintenance almost impossible.
>  
> George, W6GF



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Curious -- why is KXFL3 roofing filter an option on KX3 ?

2014-04-11 Thread george fritkin
Matching 0.1% capacitors?  What kind of a design is this that requires such 
tolerances ?  This make maintenance almost impossible.
 
George, W6GF
On Thursday, April 10, 2014 9:31 PM, Wayne Burdick  wrote:
  
Hi Phil,

The roofing filter module (KXFL3) is expensive for us to manufacture because of 
the extremely tight tolerances on the capacitors (0.1% in some cases). They 
have to be matched by hand. 

We didn't want to pass this cost on to all KX3 users, since many of them don't 
require the roofing filters. Even without them, the KX3's receiver performance 
would fall into the top 6 or so radios as measured by Sherwood Engineering 
(http://www.sherweng.com/table.html).

73,
Wayne
N6KR


On Apr 10, 2014, at 7:56 AM, Phil Hystad  wrote:

> I have a curiosity question.  Why is the KXFL3 roofing filter an option on 
> the KX3?  I mean, why is it not a built-in feature of the KX3?  First, I 
> already own a KX3 with the KXFL3 filter so I am not asking this in order to 
> choose to buy or not.  Caveat:  I am also a neophyte (philistine, ignorant, 
> or troglodyte) in this sort of radio technology and still in learner mode.
> 
> But, it seems to me that the KXFL3 roofing filter is almost required with a 
> radio as nice as the KX3.  Without it, as I understand the function, any 
> crowded band interval like a pileup or close-in CW signals and such would 
> render a KX3 (without the roofing filter) with less than the usual Elecraft 
> stellar RX performance.
> 
> My guess, and this is only a wild guess, is that maybe the option leads this 
> space open to future improved roofing filters?  Or, maybe even leave it open 
> to a 3rd party market supplied filter (although, I think this filter is 
> particularly different from other typical 3rd party filters).
> 
> 73, phil, K7PEH



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net/
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to georgefrit...@yahoo.com
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Utility 1.14.4.10 beta test version available on our FTP site

2014-04-11 Thread Tom
Hi
I second the hardware mod.  For programs such as Win4k3suite which poll the Kat 
keeping the sleep mode on introduces unacceptable delays. So instruct people to 
turn sleep mode off. 
73s Tom  va2fsq 




 Original message 
From: "Stan Gibbs, KR7C"  
Date: 11/04/2014  11:26  (GMT-05:00) 
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net 
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Utility 1.14.4.10 beta test version available on 
our FTP site 
 
Yes, I was typing the commands on the Command Tester tab.

I notice from my P3's 28.004 oscillator signal that the oscillator is
enabled immediately when the Firmware or Operate tabs are selected. 
However, the oscillator runs continuously while the Operate tab is selected
and turns off after a delay in the case of the Firmware tab.  Is there a
reason for this difference?  Sending firmware to the KAT500 with idle sleep
enabled seems to work reliably now, even waiting for the oscillator to
time-out first.

The Configuration and Command Tester tabs don't enable the oscillator until
the user either clicks a configuration button or sends a macro command.  In
both cases the oscillator stops after a few seconds of idleness, like the
Firmware tab.

Why not simply enable the oscillator (disable the sleep) after the utility
has established communications with the KAT500 on startup, and restore the
user's Idle Sleep setting on exit?  If users are fiddling with their KAT500
configuration, it doesn't seem like they should be that concerned about the
28.004 signal being present.  If they are using the Operate tab to monitor
station operation, then the oscillator signal will be present regardless of
the Idle Sleep setting.

However, this begs the question of other apps accessing the KAT500.  IMHO,
requiring all of them to send junk commands until they get a reasonable
response does not seem like a very reliable strategy.

Is there a hardware mod that could be made that would shift the oscillator
out of the 10m band?  That would eliminate the problem altogether, allow the
firmware to be simplified and greatly improve the communications
reliability.




-
73, Stan - KR7C
--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/KAT500-Utility-1-14-4-10-beta-test-version-available-on-our-FTP-site-tp7586987p7587017.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http:/
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Utility 1.14.4.10 beta test version available on our FTP site

2014-04-11 Thread Stan Gibbs, KR7C
Yes, I was typing the commands on the Command Tester tab.

I notice from my P3's 28.004 oscillator signal that the oscillator is
enabled immediately when the Firmware or Operate tabs are selected. 
However, the oscillator runs continuously while the Operate tab is selected
and turns off after a delay in the case of the Firmware tab.  Is there a
reason for this difference?  Sending firmware to the KAT500 with idle sleep
enabled seems to work reliably now, even waiting for the oscillator to
time-out first.

The Configuration and Command Tester tabs don't enable the oscillator until
the user either clicks a configuration button or sends a macro command.  In
both cases the oscillator stops after a few seconds of idleness, like the
Firmware tab.

Why not simply enable the oscillator (disable the sleep) after the utility
has established communications with the KAT500 on startup, and restore the
user's Idle Sleep setting on exit?  If users are fiddling with their KAT500
configuration, it doesn't seem like they should be that concerned about the
28.004 signal being present.  If they are using the Operate tab to monitor
station operation, then the oscillator signal will be present regardless of
the Idle Sleep setting.

However, this begs the question of other apps accessing the KAT500.  IMHO,
requiring all of them to send junk commands until they get a reasonable
response does not seem like a very reliable strategy.

Is there a hardware mod that could be made that would shift the oscillator
out of the 10m band?  That would eliminate the problem altogether, allow the
firmware to be simplified and greatly improve the communications
reliability.




-
73, Stan - KR7C
--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/KAT500-Utility-1-14-4-10-beta-test-version-available-on-our-FTP-site-tp7586987p7587017.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Using the K3 ACC socket

2014-04-11 Thread Jim Rogers

Slava,

Thank you for posting the breakout connector.  I am always soldering or 
crimping DB-9 and DE-15 connectors for shop projects.


Answering your question, I use a Timewave "Navigator" interface here and 
built the interconnect cable myself, for PTT IN and FSK keying via the 
K3 ACC connector.  I normally use solder type DB-9 and DB-15 connectors 
as the pins are a bit more stable. I have had some the crimp style 
connectors back out on me.


The ICOM gear uses a 13 pin DIN connector and the pigtail is really 
short, about 3 inches, so you still need some type of terminal block or 
you can just solder splice the connection. The one I received was not 
marked but the wires are color coded.


As an aside, the Navigator has been my favorite interface for years and 
it provides such trouble free installation and application, that I 
highly recommend it.  Provided via 6 USB/Serial ports are CAT, PTT, 
WinKey (internal to the Navigator), True FSK with compatible radios of 
which the K3 is one, an Auxilliary RS232 port always handy around the 
shack, and lastly a port to configure the built in, low noise, USB 
Codec, FSK parameters etc. It makes all the CAT,PTT, FSK,CW Key, 
soundcard in and out rear panel connections to the K3 via a single USB 
connection that is very RFI safe.



73s Jim, W4ATK


On 4/11/2014 8:04 AM, Slava Baytalskiy wrote:

Hi everyone!
I have a question about the ACC socket on the K3.
I saw on HamNation that Icom IC-7000 gives you this ACC pigtail cable with all 
the leads marked, so that you could plug it in and easily pick out the pins you 
need to use for whatever it is you're doing.
Does Elecraft have something like that available? I coulThdn't really find 
one...
Instead, i saw this thing online: 
http://www.winfordeng.com/products/brksd15hd.php
Its a DB15HD breakout connector that gives you screw terminal for each of the 
pins (K3 does have the regular Female DB15 High Density, 3-row connector, 
right?).
Is that something that you guys are using?

This site seems to have a lot of these sort of connectors...

Thanks!
Slava B
W2RMS
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to jim.w4...@gmail.com



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] [KX3] Follow-up on SWR Instability

2014-04-11 Thread Gary Hawkins
Well, it's reassuring to know that the problem is all most certainly 
associated with data sampling and not a failure of the KX3 - I thought 
for a while there the unit was going back to Elecraft.


For those that asked questions relating to other modes, this problem 
does not appear to manifest with FM, AM or when using the TUNE function.


That being said, as someone that uses my KX3 almost exclusively for 
portable SOTA SSB activation, accurate reporting of real-time SWR 
measurements when operating in SSB mode is important.  Often I'm tucked 
behind rocks or under trees trying to stay protected from the elements 
on a high peak and my antenna might not be in easy sight. Thus, a high 
SWR reading is usually the first indication that there's a problem with 
my portable antenna.  Typically wind buffeting related, problems are my 
20ft fishing pole colaspes or one of the linked dipole connectors 
touch.  So for me a reliable SWR real-time reading is important.


Also, I'd had over 500 QSO before seeing this problem.  Thus, I believe 
either a recent firmware or configuration change has caused the issue.


Finally, a fix should be fairly simple.  If the problem is as described 
- a stale data issue where SWR is calculated by Reverse Power at time T 
divided by Forward Power at time T + some delay (which explains why the 
spiking occurs as the power falls following the end of a syllable), a 
fix can be effected in several ways i) reverse the order of the power 
measurements, that is ensure forward power used in the calculation is 
always measured before the reverse power or ii) do not undertake the 
calculation if the forward power has dropped below a certain threshold, 
say 2W.


As a portable operator, I for one would certainly like to see a fix.

73's Gary K6YOA


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Using the K3 ACC socket

2014-04-11 Thread Jim Miller
I'm using the Winford boards along with the DIN rails mounted on an
aluminum panel by my desk. Very nice way to break out the AUX connector as
well as to break out pins from RS232 lines to perform other functions. The
little bit of proto room on each board makes adding translator transistors,
etc, easy.

73

jim ab3cv


On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Slava Baytalskiy wrote:

> Hi everyone!
> I have a question about the ACC socket on the K3.
> I saw on HamNation that Icom IC-7000 gives you this ACC pigtail cable with
> all the leads marked, so that you could plug it in and easily pick out the
> pins you need to use for whatever it is you're doing.
> Does Elecraft have something like that available? I couldn't really find
> one...
> Instead, i saw this thing online:
> http://www.winfordeng.com/products/brksd15hd.php
> Its a DB15HD breakout connector that gives you screw terminal for each of
> the pins (K3 does have the regular Female DB15 High Density, 3-row
> connector, right?).
> Is that something that you guys are using?
>
> This site seems to have a lot of these sort of connectors...
>
> Thanks!
> Slava B
> W2RMS
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to j...@jtmiller.com
>
>
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] Using the K3 ACC socket

2014-04-11 Thread Slava Baytalskiy
Hi everyone!
I have a question about the ACC socket on the K3.
I saw on HamNation that Icom IC-7000 gives you this ACC pigtail cable with all 
the leads marked, so that you could plug it in and easily pick out the pins you 
need to use for whatever it is you're doing.
Does Elecraft have something like that available? I couldn't really find one...
Instead, i saw this thing online: 
http://www.winfordeng.com/products/brksd15hd.php
Its a DB15HD breakout connector that gives you screw terminal for each of the 
pins (K3 does have the regular Female DB15 High Density, 3-row connector, 
right?).
Is that something that you guys are using?

This site seems to have a lot of these sort of connectors...

Thanks!
Slava B
W2RMS
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] Use of Heil HC-4/5 and Behringer T-1 Microphone

2014-04-11 Thread Ron Bell
Has anyone tried using a Heil Gold with the HC5 and HC5 cartridge
microphone or a Behringer T-1 Condenser microphone with a KX3 ?  Any
recommendation for the settings: Mic gain; CMP; TX Equalization.  The H3
microphone works great but I want to use my KX3 with my boom mics.
Thanks.
Ron
AF1Q
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Eneloop 2500 mah batteries

2014-04-11 Thread Greg Troxel
  Just received my Sanyo eneloop 2500 mAH rechargeable batteries niMH
  cells..will start the charge cycle when I get home from work
  tonight. How long should I charge them for...this will be the first
  charge and I have not used the radio yet at all with these new
  batteries.

The most important thing to avoid is running down one cell to 0 while in
use because of differential charge/capacity.  But as long as BATMIN is
>= 8.4, that's not too likely (1.05 Vpc under load, or one at 0 and 7 at
1.2Vpc).

I just got 16 Sanyo Eneloop 2000 mAh cells.  I first discharged them
individually to 0.9V at 200 mA with a Maha C9000, and obtained 1398 to
1414 mAh.  I then did refresh-analyze with 1000 mA charge, 200 mA
discharge, and got 1783 to 1855 mAh.  They are rated at 1900 mAh
minimum, but I hadn't cycled them multiple times yet, and I'm
discharging at 200 mA rather than the specified 100 mA rate.  The 1783
mAh cell did 1917 mAh on a second cycle.

So I conclude that the eneloop 2000 cells I got are good quality and
honestly marked about capacity, and when delivered were at about 77%
state of charge.

So while the recommendation of others to charge for 8h is sound, I'd
recommend that you get a Maha C9000 and test your cells :-) That's not
so important with new sanyo cells (because every battery I've ever seen
from Sanyo has been ok when new), but I've found that cells wear out
over the years.

Way more detail than is useful, semi-organized:
  http://www.lexort.com/blog/12v.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] KX3: thermal frequency drift

2014-04-11 Thread Edward R Cole
I decided to test the frequency stability of the KX3 on 6m under 
key-down conditions one would see using JT65.  Note : I have not 
performed the Temperature Compensation Procedure so not expecting 
frequency to hold as close as after  doing the procedure.


I checked frequency five times with quick transmissions that would 
not result in heating:
50.125000 was the dial frequency measured with 5w output measured on 
a Bird 43 meter.

50.124981  -29 Hz error
50.124950  -50 Hz error
50.124960  -40 Hz error
50.124957  -43 Hz error
50.124957  -43 Hz error

Next I ran ten sequences where I keyed down for 50-seconds and Rx for 
70-seconds to duplicate JT65 transmitting sequences:  I got drift downward of

50, 49, 34, 25, 29, 32, 19, 12, 9, and 12 Hz
Cold frequency at the start of each sequence varied from 979 to 960 to 994 Hz.

It did appear that the radio warmed up over the 20-minutes test and 
high/low frequency deviation narrowed to about 10-Hz downward 
drift.  At the end the radio case was quite warm and the HI TEMP 
warning came on!  From this I would not recommend running JT65 for 
extended time with the stock KX3.


Next I installed the nice external heat sink being made by Fred 
Meier, VE7FMN.  I installed it in place of the original
heat sink plate which took about 20-minutes to install (remove four 
screws that hold the heat plate and install the new heat sink using 
supplied allen screw bolts.  I decided to purchase the plain aluminum 
heat sink vs the black power-coat version.  I used no heat-sink 
compound trusting just the metal surface conduction and two 4-40 
screws that secure the transmit transistor tabs.


Testing at 5w I observed 50.124962 +/- 1 Hz over three 50-second 
cycles.  The heat sink only felt mildly warm (barely 
detectable).  Note: this is without performing the Temperature 
Calibration Procedure!  To say I am impressed it an 
understatement.  I will be interested to see if the initial 38-Hz 
cold-temp frequency error is minimized by the Temp Compensation 
procedure.  Note: I tested my frequency counter accuracy against my 
10-MHz OCXO reference and saw less than a Hz error.


How this will affect temperature related drift using the new 2m 
module remains to be determined as the Tx device on the 2m board 
probably does not use the existing heat sink interface. I'll post the 
raw data on my website later on.


73, Ed - KL7UW
http://www.kl7uw.com
"Kits made by KL7UW"
Dubus Mag business:
dubus...@gmail.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] OT: Begali Paddles

2014-04-11 Thread Joel Black

Thank you for all the responses. I got lots of them.

From the responses, All-in-all, both keys are great. I actually got a 
couple of offers to buy one or the other from a couple of people.


73,
Joel - W4JBB

On 4/9/14, 5:18 AM, Joel Black wrote:
When I upgraded to Extra, I bought myself the Begali Adventure Mono to 
go with my KX3. Needless to say, I have not been on *any* "Adventures" 
with my KX3 - yet. Mostly just taking it with me to work and using it 
during my lunch break.


I like the Begali paddle I have. Currently, I have it in the shack on 
its magnetic base on a piece of steel I took from an old bent up 
Bencher key. Eventually I'd like to put it with my KX3 *only* instead 
of moving it back and forth.


I'm not a *great* CW operator and I'm definitely *not* QRQ. I putter 
around 15 - 17WPM but I like nice CW tools. I'm looking to spend no 
more than $300 and am wondering about the Begali Simplex (which can be 
had for much less than $300). I have also looked at the N3ZN keys and 
they are very nice too. I actually had a ZN6 at one point, but sold it.


Any thoughts?

Please, in the interest of the list, reply directly to my email address.

73,
Joel - W4JBB
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to w4...@charter.net



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] [KX3] SWR Reading Instability Follow-up

2014-04-11 Thread Mark Petiford
This really looks like a data latency of a stale data issue, as I discussed in 
an earlier posting and Don expanded on in his post.  To me, this is a minor 
curiosity, but I am sure that there will be a few who will say their radio is 
worthless because of it.    MarkKE6BB
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com