Re: [Elecraft] I'm building a personal email list....

2020-06-19 Thread Al K0VM via Elecraft

not me
al, K0VM

On 6/19/2020 3:05 PM, Ken G Kopp wrote:

If you -don't- want to be included -do- say so.  I won't be offended.

Regards,

Ken Kopp - K0PP
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to al.k...@yahoo.com


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com 


Re: [Elecraft] K3S and RTTY Contesting with N1MM+/MMTTY

2016-02-07 Thread Al K0VM via Elecraft

Rich,
  Except for the specific references to K3, you answer should be framed 
( and filed ) for its completeness.


AL, K0VM

On 2/6/2016 4:59 PM, Richard Ferch wrote:
There is some confusion evident in your post on the roles of the 
connections between the radio and the computer.


There are three separate connections needed for operation in data 
modes (possibly four in FSK).


The first of these connections is for rig control from N1MM+. On a K3, 
this is the RS232 port. On a K3S, you can use the USB connection 
instead, provided the K3S's CONFIG:RS232 is set for USB. Either way, 
this represents one serial port in the software. N1MM+ must be 
configured to use this port for rig control, and this port cannot be 
used by MMTTY when it is run from within N1MM+. This last limitation 
(inability to share a serial port between the two programs) is why the 
configuration that you use in MMTTY stand-alone does not work when you 
run MMTTY from N1MM+.


The second connection is for audio to and from MMTTY. On a K3, there 
are actually two cables for audio, one in and one out, but on a K3S, 
these can be replaced by a single USB connection to the USB codec 
inside the radio. This happens to be shared with the same USB cable 
that conveys rig control, but there are two separate and independent 
devices as far as the software is concerned - one is a serial port, 
the other is a sound card, and there is no interaction between the two 
in the application software.


This audio connection is used for receive audio, and in AFSK, for 
transmit audio. MMTTY is configured to use the radio's USB codec as 
its sound card; N1MM+ does not need to use the sound card at all in 
data modes (SSB is another story, but I won't go into that here).


The third connection is for TX/RX control, or PTT. There are several 
ways of doing this on the K3/K3S, and it can be controlled either in 
the radio, or in N1MM+, or in MMTTY - pick one.


In AFSK (or in CW), the method internal to the radio is VOX. If you 
use VOX, you do not need to, and for the sake of avoiding confusion 
you should not, configure any other method of PTT either in N1MM+ or 
in MMTTY. However, VOX does not work in FSK D. If the radio is in FSK 
D, PTT must be controlled some other way (either via radio command or 
via a hardware PTT connection).


A second method is to use software radio commands from N1MM+ over the 
radio control line to control PTT. This method can be used by MMTTY 
when it is run stand-alone, but it is not available to MMTTY when it 
is run from within N1MM+ because of the inability to share the port. 
If you use this method, you do not need either a hardware connection 
or VOX.


A third method is to use serial port keying, by convention usually 
done on RTS, although it is possible to use DTR. In most radios, this 
has to be a separate port from the radio control port, and it has to 
be through a keying circuit. The K3 and K3S are exceptions - you can 
use RTS on the radio control port without any keying circuitry by 
setting CONFIG:PTT-KEY to RTS-OFF (or RTS-DTR to allow CW keying on 
DTR). This must be done from N1MM+, not from MMTTY, because the radio 
control port cannot be shared between the two programs.


You can also use a different serial port for PTT control, in which 
case it would be connected through a keying circuit to either the PTT 
IN jack or to the ACC connector on the K3/K3S. Since this is a 
different serial port from the radio control port, you can choose to 
use it either from N1MM+ or from MMTTY.


The fourth possible connection (which may be shared with the third PTT 
method) is for FSK keying from MMTTY, which is applied via the ACC 
connector. This can be done from a serial port through a keying 
circuit, but it must be a different serial port from the one used for 
rig control. This is a hardware limitation, not just software. The FSK 
serial port must be configured in MMTTY, and there is normally no need 
to mention it at all in N1MM+. MMTTY can also use this same port for 
PTT control, in which case you do not need to configure a PTT method 
in N1MM+.


It is possible to configure a serial port used by MMTTY in N1MM+ in 
such a way that N1MM+ only uses it in CW/SSB and hands it over to 
MMTTY in data modes, but this is only necessary if you need to 
time-share the FSK port with other uses in other modes, or if you want 
to use FSK with the built-in MMVARI engine in N1MM+.


There is another way to do FSK, and that is via radio control commands 
embedded in CAT1ASC macros in N1MM+, but this method is not supported 
by the N1MM+ programming team, i.e. you are on your own if you try it.


There is no TCP/IP connection to the radio. HRD may use TCP/IP for 
intercommunication between its software modules, but the K3 or K3S has 
no Ethernet connection and no way to use TCP/IP.


Bottom line: You may use VOX in AFSK if you choose to do so, but it is 
not necessary if you have correctly configured one o

Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 vs K3 ATU

2013-08-04 Thread Al K0VM
The KAT-500 utility shows C Values from 8 to 1360 pf ( ~2600 max ) and L 
values from 50 to 9000 nH ( ~18000 max ).. I assume that is what is in 
the hardware.


AL, K0VM

On 8/4/2013 9:37 AM, Gary Ferdinand wrote:

I am considering getting a KAT500 to provide me with higher power auto-tuning.  
Currently, the KAT3 is capable of achieving a match on all bands using my 
open-wire fed 160-meter dipole, with some help from a 4:1 balun.  I believe 
both tuners are T-matches, but I don't have enough information to judge whether 
the KAT500 will achieve the same matches that the KAT3 will.

Can anyone give me the L and C values for each tuner?

Thanks,

Gary W2CS
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html