[Elecraft] USB Support - K3, K2?

2007-08-08 Thread Charles Allison
John,

I think that is a very small fee per device or may be per some sort of
assignment ID codes to be kept unique.

Primarily the USB standards cater to the mass production market.  Most of
the options for a design expect thousands of units to be produced in a
production run.  The USB interface is a nasty little complicated thing and
requires a large investment in study time to get familar with it.  Also,
there's no telling for just how long a time it will remain valid.  It is a
product of the modern PC age.  The serial interface is slow and cumbersome
and lacks many standards which tend to constrain things rather than help
sometimes.  It predates personal computers and to some extent, predates
computers, going back to the days of the teletype.  While not offering high
speed and not being suitable for transferring large amounts of information
quickly, it can be superior to the USB in some ways - specifically - wired
interfaces for distances longer than 10 or 20 feet.  For some 'secondary'
hardware  standards like RS485 instead of RS232, it can provide interfaces
in excess of 1000 feet.

Although USB style to RS232 interface devices may eventually become
specialty products not found at the local computer store due to a lack of
need from most users, they should remain around as specialty items.  If
RS232 is suitable for the job, then it might even be a safer bet than USB to
use for a product that should be expected to be around for a decade or more
rather than the typical life expectancy of 10 weeks for the usual computer
junk.  Most of my USB/serial ports were from the office supply place and
labeled as USB interfaces for PDAs.  I'm sure there are better suited ones
for RF environments and probably cheaper ones too.  But as long as USB
survives, they should provide me with the ability to connect to real devices
I need, such as radios, telescopes, TNCs, and gizmos that I can build and
program PCs to operate without having to read several hundred pages of barf
just to do something simple - like a dual azimuth antenna rotator
controller.  Such a homebrew project is impractical with USB, if not
virtually impossible, with most options having development kits that would
cost more than buying a commerical rotator in the first place.

As for USB, it's the best thing that's happened to RS232 serial ports since
willard  gates succeeded in getting the native ones banned because now
there's no seriously low limit as to how many you can stick on your PC and
they are the size of a pigtail cable with a long connector housing on the
end.  What's more, they are finally well supported as serial port devices by
the OS.

best regards,

Charles
wb5izd

Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 13:23:26 -0400
From: John Huggins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] USB Support - K3, K2?
To: Richard Kent [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

I am not sure, but can point to one example that does include a USB
chip in its design that takes care of the conversion from USB to
serial.  It is the WinKeyUSB interface from K1EL.  It is quite possible
the purchase of the chip might pay such fees indirectly.  If it does the
fees must be low as the cost of the kit is under $50.

Richard Kent wrote:

I thought I heard or read that including an USB controller into a piece of
equipment requires one to pay a licensing fee to the organization that
maintains the USB definition. If this is true that could be why many
devices
do not include USB compatibility. The cost may be too much for the number
of
devices to be sold. Anyone know for sure??

Rick Kent WD8AJG



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] vibroplex bug

2007-07-27 Thread Charles Allison

- Original Message - 
From: Charles Allison
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 8:20 AM
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] vibroplex bug


Chris,

My wife got the bug bug, the straight key bug, the iambic key bug... fairly
recently too.  She is a dedicated but fairly slow cw operator as well and
keeps a 1960 vintage vibroplex, a blackwidow iambic and a modern russian
knockoff of the world war II Junkers german key all tied to her K2 at the
same time.  She's also got 3 or 4 more bugs, mostly Vibroplex.  One can buy
weights for the Vibroplex to slow it down and I think she's got 2 weights on
her regular key.  One of the keys had a 4-40 screw hole tapped in the side
of the weight.  It was explained that this used to be done by some operators
that installed a copper tube, squashed and drilled, to  provide an extra
weight as a lever that could be used to immediately change speeds by pushing
the top outward or inward - without having to loosen the weight screw,
position the weight and then tightening the weight screw down again.

best regards,

Charles
wb5izd

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 18:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: Chris Kantarjiev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] vibroplex bug
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I got the bug bug about a year ago, and found a 1923 Vibroplex in decent
shape. Yeah, the dot rate is way too fast to learn with. After exploring
many options for slowing it, I went to a local hobby shop and got a bit
of brass tubing that has an ID that is a slip fit over the rod. About 6
did it for me - slows the dots right down and still allows me to do
some adjusting.

73 de chris K6DBG


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Re: Detecting the LO [was: plexiglass] (Vic K2VCO) clarification

2006-07-11 Thread charles allison
Hi,

I remember reading about the Brits searching for spies who were tuned to
certain frequencies that transmitted coded information to the agents who
might not have even had transmitters.

A quick clarification.  The IF stage is 455kc and the LO is an HF oscillator
that is offset from the tuned frequency by 455kc so that the difference is
fed into the IF stage for amplification.  (I decided to use Kc rather than
khz as wwii predates the change in terms lol).  By searching for the actual
LO frequency - the Brits counterintellegence people could identify which
radios were listening to the enemy's coded messages and avoid wasting time
on those listening to Churchill's speeches.

best regards,

Charles
wb5izd


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Re: Solar Panels (Douglas Todd)

2006-07-04 Thread charles allison

Hi Doug,

My wife has a 50 Watt solar panel she uses for emergency power.  They are
definitely not the transportable or affordable kind - unless you find one
taken out of commercial service and then they tend to be cheaper than buying
new small ones.  She is a net control station and a local ARES member and we
are 30 miles off the water on the lower TX coast.

The panel is used to charge a 12V deep discharge marine battery -
approximately 100 AmpHr.  The panel provides up to about 5 amps.  Even that
scarcely provides enough power for net control activities 2 to 4 hours per
day using the full 100 Watts.

One must scale the system to the radio and to use.  Obviously, you wouldn't
want this setup for a kx1 backpacking  system.  The most common batteries
are called sealed lead acid and provide decent power for size and weight.  A
4 AH or 7AH battery is not too unreasonable for man portable usage and can
generally power a few watts for a reasonable length of time.  In general,
one sees the C/10 term for what the battery is rated at.  A 7AH battery
doesn't mean 7 amps for one hour but rather 7/10 amp per hour for 10 hours
and .350 Amps should last for a good 20 hours.  Also, charging rates tend to
be about this rate also, C/10 although full charge will probably not be
reached in just 10 hours at that rate.

Once the battery is selected for your requirement, then you need to select a
solar panel that can deliver the charging rates needed to charge the
battery, typically in aaround 10 hrs.  Buying new solar panels is not for
most people.  Anything affordable is usually too small for any use other
than to float charge (keeps a battery from discharging).  The surplus stores
offer a significant discount on new pricing for larger panels.  Once the
panel is obtained - one needs a switching regulator for solar panels of that
size.  Some hams offer them and potted commercial ones are also available
for not too much cost as well.  These are needed because the open circuit
voltage could be 20 VDC for a 12.6 volt panel without the regulator.

If you're in ARES RACES emcomm arena, it might be possible to find even the
larger  panels from your local gov. that has replaced them on those solar
powered school crossing lights.


best regards,
Charles Allison
wb5izd (husband of k2/100 and kx1 owner)



- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 3:02 AM
Subject: Elecraft Digest, Vol 27, Issue 4


Send Elecraft mailing list submissions to
elecraft@mailman.qth.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of Elecraft digest...

Message: 8
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 10:56:08 -0700
From: Douglas Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Elecraft] Solar Panels
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

I'm interested in using solar panels to power the K2 for emergency/field day
operations and am wondering what sort of experience others have had.  The
panels seem expensive: about $100 for a 5 watt panel  but with battery and a
low power draw of the K2, they  look like they can sustain operations for
extended periods of time.

How does this work in practice ? Is there enough 'juice' delivered to keep a
station operational ? How about portability ?

Thanks to everyone in advance for your responses.

Douglas Todd (KE7GYQ)



--


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Re: Elecraft Horizontal Loop Antenna (Kevin Shaw)

2005-12-22 Thread charles allison
Kevin,

I've built 2 low loop antennas that are currently in operation.  My wife
uses one for 80 and 40m regional communications, essentially the whole state
of texas plus surrounding states.  It is composed of insulated wire with a
current balun fed by rg58 and is up about 15 feet and is diamond shape.  She
uses a K2 /100 with kat100.  In general on those bands, it can function nvis
mode and provide up to 2 s-units of improvement over my gap challenger
vertical on both transmit and receive.

This prompted my other creation for a friend that had just moved into a
restricted neighborhood near houston.  We created a loop using aluminum
electric fence wire and insulators mounted under the eaves of his house,
about 8 ft. above the ground.  The reason for this was not so much cost but
because there are evidently some sort of proximity alarm sensors that use
similar materials.  Also, even though the wire stretches across the brick
facade in front where there are not soffits, it is not visible from the 20
feet away.  The wire is fed with several feet of 450 ladder line and a
homemade 4/1 balun,   The ladderline was cut so as to be run almost to the
entrance on the house  but not so as to lay on the ground.  Tuning is done
with an mfj manual tuner and works with a 100 watt ricebox rig.

Operation of this antenna is not nearly as good as my wife's but our friends
signal rivals that of an attic mounted trap dipole antenna located about 30
miles from there which is owned by a mutual friend.  Regional communications
on these antennas is exercised every weekday morning at 6am on 80 meters
with a group of friends and conditions have ranged from good to unbelievably
horrible over the last few weeks.

For regional comm. on 80 and 40 I heartily reccomend the loop low down, but
12-18 ft seems to be best.  I think it best that the loop be put around the
back yard rather than around the house but it's hard to guess what you might
get away with if anyone can see it.  For dx, there's no beating a vertical
in this case, maybe disguised as a flagpole.

best regards,

Charles
wb5izd

   21. Horizontal Loop Antenna (Kevin Shaw)
 Message: 21
 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:58:05 -0500
 From: Kevin Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Elecraft] Horizontal Loop Antenna
 To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

 I've been thinking about what kind of antenna to put up. With my height
and
 deed restrictions, I'm quite limited. I've thought about putting up a
 horizontal loop antenna. Basically I was planning to run some enameled
 magnet wire around the perimeter of the roof (I have no plans on running
 more than 10 watts). The wire would lay under the shingles so it can't be
 seen. The antenna will be 1 WL long on 80 meters. I'll run coax down to
the
 K2 + ATU.



 This is similar to The Loop Skywire described in the November 1985 issue
 of QST. Anyone have experience (or see a problem) with this antenna?



 Thanks,



 Kevin

 N8IQ






___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Re: Algorithm for Tuner (Don)

2005-09-17 Thread charles allison

Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 08:51:33 -0700
From: Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Algorithm for Tuner
To: Bill Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1;
reply-type=response

Bill,

It's worse than that.  Even with my reed relays (very fast compared to
conventional relays) I have to allow 10 mS for them to settle and the A/D
requires a millisecond or so to read the forward and reflected power.


Don,

Why not take an approach normal to the manual tuner.  That is capacitance to
mid scale and adjust L to best.  Then adjust C up or down from midscale for
min. ? Doing this with a possible repeat  for missing the L value by +/- 1
has always yielded me good fast manual results on my old mfj tuners and
doesn't require a tremendous number of iterations or complex programming.

best regards,

Charles
wb5izd



A reiterative  multilevel slope-sensing algorithm using decreasing
granularity*  is the answer.  I have been slowely creeping up on a
satisfactory solution and, depending on distractions, hope to have a fairly
fast autotuner in a week or so.  Suggestions from the list have been very
helpful.

* my term ... don't try to look it up!  ;)

Don  K7FJ


 On Sep 15, 2005, at 11:22 AM, Craig Rairdin wrote:

 In this particular case, if you were to iterate over all possible
 combinations of L and C it's only necessary to store the best  result so
 far
 and compare the current result to the best result. If the current  result
 is
 better, it becomes the new best. Now you have no sorting at all and  your
 time is order N instead of order N^2.

 The problem with the exhaustive search is there are 2^17 = 131,072
 combinations to try. (256 cap and inductor values, plus reversing the
 whole L network)

 It takes a few ms for each relay to physically switch. If you can try  100
 combinations a second (10 ms), that's still about 20 minutes to  try them
 all. Even with 1 ms switching time, you're still looking at  2 minutes to
 find a match.

 A tough problem.

 Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASELMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Quote: Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!
 -- Wilbur Wright, 1901






___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Fw: [Elecraft] Re: CW in Emergencies

2005-09-13 Thread charles allison
I guess Eric didn't get this message sent directly to him the first time
with specifics examples concerning CW during Katrina that we are aware of
here.


best regards,

Charles Allison
wb5izd


- Original Message - 
From: charles allison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: EricJ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 8:25 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Re: CW in Emergencies? (WAS: Dropping the Code Test)



 ka5klu sent  10 to 20 hw msgs per night into MS starting monday night
 Don, ac5xk, did some msgs on monday night via cw also.  These are the only
 ones I know of because my wife is involved in the hw networks and these
are
 the only ones she was interfacing with that were doing cw into the area -
at
 least that she told me about.

 As for cnn, are you sure they were really there?  The media has been known
 to fake things in the past as well as regularly distorting what they
report.
 In any case, I've never seen a media team doing emergency or hw traffic
 message handling, except as an occaisional diversion for the tv camera to
 record.

 As for bpl, it's an abuse of existing technology  that provides inferior
 results compared to alternatives and causes harmful interference to a lot
 more than just amateur radio.  Just wait til it comes out that it's
possible
 to decode the data going through remotely and that some geek is selling
 decoding systems on the gray market so that crooks as well as the fbi can
 monitor what people are doing on it.  note that such things have been done
 by intellegence services all the way back to monitoring emitted noise from
 the old telex machines.


 - Original Message - 
 From: EricJ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'charles allison' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 2:55 PM
 Subject: RE: [Elecraft] Re: CW in Emergencies? (WAS: Dropping the Code
Test)


  WHOA! Back up the bus, there, Charles. I'd like a citation for that one!
I
  have been searching google (a major investor in BPL) diligently and have
 not
  seen a single reference to CW in this disaster. Not one.
 
  Actually, Craig fingered the reality. The FIRST communications out of
the
  affected area were via CNN and the major networks who had pre-staged
 cameras
  and crews in the area.
 
  We're living a myth. All of us. Hams, ham clubs, the ARRL. We're going
to
  get blind-sided. That quote in the WSJ from a BPL rep saying amateurs
 were
  nothing, is a WARNING. With all the billions of dollars behind BPL, and
  hams defending their existence with fairy tales, we are ripe for an
attack
  from powerful, moneyed interests and they will eat our lunch.
 
 
  Eric
  KE6US
  www.ke6us.com
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of charles allison
  Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 9:17 AM
  To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
  Subject: [Elecraft] Re: CW in Emergencies? (WAS: Dropping the Code Test)
 
 
  The first communications with the affected area from the outside were HF
 CW.



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Re: An Opportunity for CW Ops K2 use in emergencies

2005-09-13 Thread charles allison
Johnny,

My wife's rig is a k2/100 with most or all internal accessories and kat100.
She has been quite active in health and welfare traffic handling for Katrina
and has been involved on a regular basis with traffic nets since shortly
after upgrading to general class.  She is just starting to learn CW traffic
handling now but is already quite proficient at ssb traffic handling and net
control functions.

Her K2 has worked admirably for her use on a daily basis for this.  It is an
excellent rig and is nice, small and powerful.  She has it mounted in a
portable wood box along with a power supply and a 2m rig.  On her desk, she
keeps 2 12V 7.5 AH lead acid batteries on a trickle charger and can switch
to backup power with a single switch on the front panel of the box.  The
wood box has antenna cables, ground strap, a battery cable plug (anderson
connectors like the k2/100 upgrade), and the power supply ac plug coming out
of the back.  it takes only a minute or two to disconnect and carry to the
car.

Additionally, she has a 50 watt solar panel and deep discharge marine
battery (about 100 Ah ??) available for long term use without commercial
power.  This system appears to be able to keep the battery charged on sunny
days even with rather heavy use.

While she has a small portable vertical 40-10 screwdriver,  we tend to
prefer setting up either a loop or dipole at 15 ft or below for portable
use.  These are 80-10 meter antennas that run NVIS on 80 and 40m capable of
blanketing the state of TX and beyond with usable signals during just about
anything but the poorest of conditions.

So in a nutshell.  The k2 is capable of being one of the best sort of
emergency radios possible for HF.  I don't think it is used substantially
only because I believe that there are relatively few K2s out there compared
to a multitude of other brands and radios from current and previous eras.
Also, being a kit or built by an individual, tends to be a disadvantage when
considered for purchase by an entity associated with emergency operations.

best regards,

Charles
wb5izd




 --

 Message: 26
 Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:10:59 +0800
 From: Johnny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] An Opportunity for CW Ops
 To: Ron D'Eau Claire [EMAIL PROTECTED],
 elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1;
 reply-type=original

 Hi Group,

 I have read so many message about emergency net in US.  I am interested in
 knowing whether K2 has been greatly used in emergency communication.  Can
I
 have your advice?

 73

 Johnny Siu VR2XMC
 builder of s/n 1146, 4225, 4165 ...


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Re: CW in Emergencies? (WAS: Dropping the Code Test)

2005-09-06 Thread charles allison
Hi,

One thing that most miss in this debate, especially on the gov. is the
realization that communications is a skill that is every bit as important as
the technical knowledge required to turn a piece of wire into a working
antenna.  It seems on the gov. side that communications skills means the
glib ability to push BS on a receptive audience and not convey information
in an efficient manner.

Pushing license renewals, birthday greetings and the like on a regular basis
by whatever net means, cw, phone, gives one a great advantage over those who
don't

While the disadvantage of CW is both speed and accuracy among those of us
with little skill, it's advantage is massive.  It offers maximum range for
minimum power and equipment, conditions that prevail in most bad disasters.
While using a computer digital mode can even increase this range / power -
it requires a power hog of a computer.

Sure vhf is the preferred short range method, maybe 40 - 50 miles max with a
good repeater and with a network of repeaters, there's no limit.  Guess what
happens when there is no repeater and the most you can get is about 15 ft
off the ground with a makeshift antenna.  You can forget regional
communications unless you have a series of stations to relay.

The benefit of amateur radio emcomm is that it can function in devastated
areas without the necessity of a communications infrastructure.  It can
function with minimal equipment and there are many skilled communicators who
can improvise, unlike button pushing dispatchers.

The emcomm classes teach that there are preferred means for various types of
messages for desired security, accuracy and speed.  They also explain the
nature of the situation and how and why the standard infrastructure
communications of the gov. fail.

Amateur radio emcomm is not obsolete nor is it a simple rudimentary system
of obsolete technology.  It covers the full range of technology from CW to
HF radio links straight into the computer packet radio and even the internet
email network via Winlink.  It is comprised of vhf and hf, portable, mobile
and fixed stations both within and outside the affected area.   VHF and HF
comm, digital, CW and voice radio comm are merely tools to be selected for
use in the particular situation.

This disaster, Katrina, and the NOLA levee break the next day - which is its
own disaster, a massive localized catastrophe that was precipitated by
Katrina but actually happened after the storm went through, is a good
example of what is described in those ARRL emcomm courses.  Things were made
worse by the fact that many hams living there evacuated and were not allowed
back in to many areas, some legitimately like NOLA were very dangerous due
to two legged predators while other areas were merely storm damaged.  The
absence of amateur communications during the predictable communications
infrastructure failure made things worse, perhaps in NOLA, far worse.

The first communications with the affected area from the outside were HF CW.
It provides the most bang for the complexity and battery backup power makes
for simple but low power operation.  Also, the sunspot cycle is near minimum
and HF comm has been rather poor for weeks with various propagation
problems.  The next mode to come up was voice, ssb which works while the
generators are running and is down when the ops have to scramble for more
gasoline.  It took about 3 days for the digital modes to be restored or
setup, the direct Winlink internet modes and packet modes.  VHF may work
ideally inside the affected areas for short ranges but with massively tall
antennas and/or repeaters, the coverage of a handitalky is more in city
blocks than in miles.  Tall antennas and working repeaters in an emergencies
are not only rare occurances, they are a scarce resource when things really
get going at the local level.

In our area, which is flat as a pancake,  vhf comm can get us to the nearest
city and some of the surrounding counties, comfortably with repeaters,
possible without.  There are prepositioned VHF/UHF/HF stations at the
weather service, emergency op center, some hospitals, and other places.  Our
regional communications is HF which has greater than the repeater system
down here.  Amateur radio and amateur volunteers form an essential core of
volunteers for the emergency management professionals and are offered formal
training for both natural and manmade disasters along with the professional
first responders - however that is intended to enhance our abilities at
communicating in disasters rather than to put us in the teletubby suits and
scba to mop up some toxic spill.

A demonstration of communications difficulities was done as a part of a
level I or II hazmat class to emphasize the virtual impossibility of
detailed communications between responders over the radio.  It involved
describing how to construct a lego block  vehicle out of the blocks in order
to match a built one in another room by communicating over vhf handitalki.

[Elecraft] Re: K2/100 Portable Battery Pak Question (Gottlieb, Jonathan)

2005-08-04 Thread charles allison

My wife, kd5txd has a k2/100 with a small battery pack backup system at her
desk.  It is homemade with 2x, 12v, 7.2AH, lead acid batteries in parallel
with a 1-2A trickle charger.  She normally runs about 90 watts output power
on the k2 and has used this power set up as net control for as long as about
an hour, doing ubstantial SSB transmitting.  Lead acid batteries are rated
at 7.2 AH assuming either 10hr or 20hr discharge.  Discharging at a faster
rate will degrade the AH rating to some extent so that a 7.2AH battery rated
for discharging 0.72 A over 10 hours will not deliver 7.2 Amps for the a
whole hour or 3.6 Amps for a full 2 hours.  Note that 90 Watts SSB is much
lower average power than 90 watts of rtty or cw where it is transmitting
full power and drawing full current.

Since we already have two battery systems, the small 14.4AH unit mentioned
above and a 100AH deep discharge battery with 50Watt solar panel, we are not
likely to get another system soon.  If we were, I'd be inclined to get the
larger quickstart unit from WalMart or something similar.

That unit offers a 19AH battery along with light, battery booster cables and
I believe two 12v accessory plugs.

best regards,

Charles
wb5izd


   17. K2/100 Portable Battery Pak Question (Gottlieb, Jonathan)

 Message: 17
 Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 13:28:32 -0400
 From: Gottlieb, Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Elecraft] K2/100 Portable Battery Pak Question
 To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Message-ID:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

 Does anybody have any experience using the HFProjects Power-Pak with a
K2/100?  It is a nice 12v 7ah gel cell with built in trickle charger
(www.hfprojects.com).  I wouldn't expect it to power the K2/100 at full 100
Watts, but I'm thinking it would be a good way to have a nice power supply
for camping or traveling and run the k2/100 at 35-50 watts.  Please let me
know if anybody has used this successfully.

 Jonathan Gottlieb
 WA3WDK
 k2/100 #4856



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Re: stranger than real life

2005-06-13 Thread charles allison

   Hi,

There's an interesting book called The Measure of All Things which covers
the quest for determining the length of the meter for the purpose of
creating the ultimate scientifically based system of measurements called the
metric system.  The author also presents, intentionally or otherwise,
additional themes in the book about the migration from what he refers to as
savants into what we now call scientists and about some of the pitfalls of
bureaucracies and government back 'science'.  It's a book that is
interesting to read and quite insightful, bordering on being as interesting
as the book Longitude which I consider should be a must read for anyone
interested in science and technology, especially as a career.

One of the observations made in the book was that there are several criteria
for a system of measurements.  These include practical values for common use
and ease of use for the end user and ease of calibration or determination of
the validity of the measurement tools.  Beyond that, it really doesn't
matter.  Some things are more convenient to do metric, some are not.
Fortunately, only a subset of the original metric system was implemented.
We don't have 10 hour days and ten day weeks or 400 degrees in a circle.
I'm not sure many could tolerate only 7 more days until the weekend.

While there is the claim that the metric system is based upon things
physical rather than something arbitrary, like the length of some dead
king's foot, this claim is somewhat exagerated.  What matters is the ease of
reproducing the standard.  The meter itself was an attempt to be defined as
a particular fraction of the distance from pole to equator at the longitude
of Paris, the assumption at the time was that the earth was a perfect sphere
which it wasn't.  Also, the ultimate accuracy of the measurement was off by
several thousands of an inch.  The claim of absolute reference to natural
phenomenon become questionable when one asks why that fraction and why the
meridian through Paris, accuracy aside.

It's nice to use meters for wavelength because for us in the states,it's
really more abstract than feet and inches and depending on the speed of
propagation in the wire/coax, this distance in terms of wavelength can
change significantly.

As for adapting the metric system, I may use watts and occaisonally meters
and grams when appropriate but I have no interest in changing it all for no
real benefit.

best regards,

Charles




___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com