Re: [Elecraft] OT: Vertical antenna ground systems

2008-11-05 Thread George Badger
Al
The worst length for a raised radial is a resonant quarter wave. Two together 
form a half wavelength. The problem is that the ground on one side of the 
dipole is not exactly the same as the ground on the other side so the 
dipole has a life of it's own and becomes a slightly off-center 
driven resonant dipole.
It will radiate some of your energy because of it's stored energy. Energy will 
be wasted because it will be radiated so close to ground.
 The radials should be shorter or longer than a quarter wave so they do not 
form resonant dipoles. Bring the overall antenna system to resonance by 
adjusting the length of the monopole or adding appropriate reactance.
This is very well covered by Moxon [SK] in his book 'HF Antennas For All 
Locations' and elsewhere in the amateur press.
73
Good luck on your project.
George Badger     W6TC


- Original Message 
From: Alan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ken Kopp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2008 8:47:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT: Vertical antenna ground systems

N6LF has done some wonderful experimental work on vertical antennas.

He found that a radial laid on the ground experiences a velocity factor
similar to coax cable.  A quarter wavelength is only about 60% of its
free space value.  If you make the radials a physical quarter wavelength
long, they are actually closer to a half-wave electrical length
(anti-resonant).

With 4 radials he actually got about a 3 dB improvement by making them
SHORTER!

For my next vertical I will definitely plan to tune the radials.  I
think I'll try laying out a 1/2-wave dipole on the ground and then trim
it to resonance.  Then cut all the radials to equal the length of one
half of the dipole.

Al N1AL


On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 19:10, Ken Kopp wrote:
 Of potential interest to those who use verticals with their Elecraft 
 rigs.
 
          http://www.antennasbyn6lf.com/
 
 
 73!  Ken Kopp - K0PP
      [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft    
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft    

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Fw: [NCCC] Sunspots and SS

2008-11-03 Thread George Badger




- Forwarded Message 
From: George Badger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 3, 2008 7:26:13 PM
Subject: Fw: [NCCC] Sunspots and SS





- Forwarded Message 
From: George Badger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: R. Dean Straw [EMAIL PROTECTED]; James Michener [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: NCCC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 3, 2008 7:08:30 PM
Subject: Re: [NCCC] Sunspots and SS



Dean
Like insulated wire, SteppIR elements are well enclosed in dielectric tubes so 
they may not suffer from precipitation static. Can anyone confirm this?
73
George   W6TC



- Original Message 
From: R. Dean Straw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: James Michener [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: NCCC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 3, 2008 1:40:36 PM
Subject: Re: [NCCC] Sunspots and SS

Jim:

I've heard anecdotal reports that Beverage antennas made of insulated wire
work better than Beverages made with uninsulated wire. Just because the
reports are anecdotal doesn't mean that they are untrue, of course. When I
had a station in New Hampshire, I made my Beverages with insulated wire. The
Beverages worked in a predictable fashion on 40 and were worse, pattern
wise, on 20. But they were definitely quieter than the Yagis when there was
precip static going on. So the SNR was better for receiving.

I would think that insulated-wire Yagis would be better for precip than the
usual bare-tubing Yagis. That seems to be the conclusion you're coming to
also. And yes, the top Yagi in a high stack acts as a precipitation drain,
shielding the lower Yagi(s) some. Even a snake kind of antenna, with
insulated wire lying on the ground (as W0YK mentioned), can help reception
when precipitation static is happening.

I'd caution you that if you live on a hilltop, placement of the your
antennas compared to the upslope(s) to the hilltop can make a difference in
precip problems. At one time, I lived on a tall hill in San Francisco, with
about a 45 degree slope downwards in the south direction. Storms would come
up from the south and swirl winds violently up that slope, hitting the
antennas from below and creating real precip static (as well as breaking
lots of antennas -- ask W6NL about this too). I didn't have the luxury of
having another antenna on my small lot. But if I did have another antenna
and if it were located back from the slope I would imagine that it would be
better in terms of precip static.

So, the difference between your dipole and the wire Yagi may also involve
placement on your terrain, as well as the use of insulated wire. These
things get complicated.

I've been in whiteouts in southern New Hampshire, but nothing like what you
get in/near VE2. I remember disconnecting coaxes and hearing the arcing
inside the PL-259s when precip static was going on.

73, Dean, N6BV

 -Original Message-
 From: James Michener [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 12:53 PM
 To: R. Dean Straw
 Subject: Re: [NCCC] Sunspots and SS


 It rained here hard all Saturday night.  I have wire antennas.  The
 40 meter 2 element beam.  The DE is a folded dipole and the Reflector
 is insulated wire at about 60 feet.  The other an 80 meter cage
 dipole made with multiple #12 AWG not insulated copper weld wires at
 about 100 feet.  They are not at all close together.  Both are fed
 with open wire and both are tuned with (separate) old KW Johnson
 Matchboxes.  The rain static noise on the dipole was awful.  The 40
 meter beam didn't any problems.  I wonder how much having an
 insulated antenna helped in keeping down the rain static.    I did
 more contacts on 80m in the final hour than I did Saturday night...
 (I gave up early Saturday night due to the 80m static.)

 With vertically stacked Yagis,  this top antenna can acts as a static
 drain...  In my case with 100 feet of horizontal separation, there is
 little static draining effect... so some of the difference was
 height... but some of the difference maybe insulation.

 I thought the difference was largely due to insulation and not
 height... but I could be wrong.

 BTW... I went to college up near Quebec and when they get a dry snow,
 you have never heard static so bad.  It wipes out local 50KW AM
 stations.  There isn't insulation thick enough that would help.  I
 had a 2m whip on the car and the static would arc the coax while
 corona balls jumped off (or on) the end of the whip.  You really
 shouldn't be driving in that, since it was a white out.

 Jim K9JM


 At 11:55 AM 11/3/2008, you wrote:

 I wasn't talking about powerline interference when I spoke about
 precipitation static. The noise comes from the electrical charges on
 individual raindrops (or snowflakes) in a storm. These raindrops
 discharge
 when they physically strike your antenna. At K6TA, which is located on a
 hill, the precip static was often S9 + 20 dB and would typically
 last for 10
 minutes or so before gradually fading down. Then the next wave
 of rain would
 come

[Elecraft] Fw: ADD THE LOW BANDS TO YOUR STEPPIR

2008-01-05 Thread George Badger
- Forwarded Message 
From: George Badger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2008 10:30:27 PM
Subject: ADD THE LOW BANDS TO YOUR STEPPIR

About a year ago I put up my 3 el. SteppIR. It is a great antenna. To add low 
band capability I put a loop over the SteppIR in the plane of the SteppIR boom. 
The addition works like gangbusters on 30, 40, 60, 75/80 and 160. The loop also 
works as a rotatable 160 RX antenna with 30 dB F/B ratio.
The addition is so simple and effective I wrote an article describing it for 
QST. It is in the current [Feb.] issue.
Keep an eye out for the article.
73
George  W6TC
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com