Re: [Elecraft] attenuator in amp was Re: K3 and Expert 1K-FA

2010-04-21 Thread dave . wilburn
When the K3 came out there was a big deal about the default ALC polarity that 
resulted in a mod. Will the default connections of the KPA500 work with an 
un-moded radio or will we need the mod?

David Wilburn
NM4M 
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-Original Message-
From: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 fa...@panix.com
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:00:02 
To: d.cut...@ntlworld.com
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] attenuator in amp was Re:  K3 and Expert 1K-FA

Probably the biggest issue is getting rid of the 70 watts of added
heat.  If there's someplace in the exiting airstream to put these
resistors 

73, doug

   From: David Cutter d.cut...@ntlworld.com
   Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:54:21 +0100

   T0-220 style power film resistors are fairly cheap and can easily be mounted 
   on heat-sinking surfaces.

   David
   G3UNA


Hm, I wonder if the KPA500 has or can have provision for this.  That
amp can be driven to full output by 30 watts or so, IIRC.  With the K3
(or K2), power control could be done automatically by having the amp
tell the radio that it's active over the serial interface, but it's
clear the KPA500 has much provision for being used with radios other
than the K3.
   
73, doug
   
   Tom W8JI wrote:
   
   The correct approach would be an
   attenuator pad so the radio could run at near full power and
   not have a chance of overdriving the amp, ...
   
  I don't understand why more people don't do that.  For example, a 3 dB
  attenuator between the transceiver and amplifier ensures that a 100W
  exciter won't overdrive an amplifier that requires 50W of drive.  The 3
  dB loss on receive is hardly ever an issue but if you're worried about
  it, just put the attenuator inside the amplifier, after the T/R relay.
   
  Seems like a simple, foolproof solution.
   


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] P3 color selection (was Re: time to order your P3, design details?)

2010-04-19 Thread dave . wilburn
Very nicely done. Thanks for sharing the thought that went into it. 

David Wilburn
NM4M 
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-Original Message-
From: Alan Bloom n...@cds1.net
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:41:22 
To: k6...@foothill.net
Cc: Elecraft Reflectorelecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] P3 color selection (was Re:  time to order your P3,
 design details?)

Hi Fred,

I thought for quite awhile about what to do about vision-impaired users
of the P3.  I couldn't think of any way that a blind or severely
visually-impaired person would be able to get any significant benefit
from a panadapter so I finally decided not to attempt to make it usable
by the blind.

However color blindness is another story.  Many of Elecraft's customers
are older males and, like me, have some degree of color blindness.  I
have tried to take that into account in the color scheme used in the P3.
The following information comes from the Color_blindness page on
Wikipedia.

There are three types of cones (color receptors) in the retina that have
peaks in different parts of the spectrum: blue, green and red. (The
so-called red peak is actually more like orange/yellow.) The three
spectral responses overlap considerably. The eye measures the response
of each type of cone and interpolates to figure out what the actual
color must be.

Color blind does not necessarily mean blind to colors but rather an
inability to perceive differences between some of the colors that others
can distinguish. There are many types of color blindness, but the most
common (affecting about 9% of adult males) are the so-called red-green
hereditary (genetic) photoreceptor disorders, all of which make it
difficult to discriminate reds, yellows and greens from one another.
There are other types of color blindness that make it difficult to
distinguish between blue and yellow, but they are less common.

I have tried to make the default colors accommodate people with
red-green color blindness.  That means making sure that markings and
their backgrounds never both come from the red-green end of the
spectrum. It also means avoiding small objects and thin lines with such
colors (even with a blue background) because many color-blind people can
see the problem colors much better if the object has some mass to it.
It helps that this is the kind of color blindness that I have, so if it
looks good to me it should look good to others with red-green color
blindness.

In addition, to accommodate people with other types of color blindness
including those with monochromacy (total color blindness) the lines and
text on the spectrum display are all bright colors with a dark
background so they should look good in greyscale.  The waterfall display
is more difficult since the different colors are used to indicate
different signal strengths, but weak signals are represented by dark
colors so there is still some ability to discern variations in signal
strength.

Fortunately colors are trivial to change in firmware, so if we get it
wrong at first it is easy to change later.

Alan N1AL



On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 14:51 -0700, Fred Jensen wrote:
 Al Lorona wrote:
 
  That is really pretty, but my prevailing thought was that perhaps
  it's just too much eye candy-- which really doesn't make interpreting
  the data any easier. The spectrum readout-- arguably the most
  important area of the screen-- is difficult to concentrate on with
  the distraction of the other detail (color, shading, texture, 3D
  effects, text, labels, buttons, controls) of the skin.
 
 How much of the P3 display information will I miss?  I have no color vision.
 
 73,
 
 Fred K6DGW
 - Northern California Contest Club
 - CU in the 2010 Cal QSO Party 2-3 Oct 2010
 - www.cqp.org


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] 40m Net Band plan

2009-08-31 Thread dave . wilburn
There is a significant difference between US band plans, and those of other 
nations in the region. This has been causing increasing animosity between the 
different groups.  Some authorized SSB and others CW in the same frequency band.

Please note, I am not saying one is right and the other isn't, just noting the 
issue. 

Regardless, I agree, the best plan is to ignore purposeful QRM. 

David Wilburn
NM4M 
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 -extended- low end Bass response back in next betarelease

2009-08-28 Thread dave . wilburn
There are no bugs!

Merely undocumented features ;)

David Wilburn
NM4M 
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-Original Message-
From: pd0psb p.s.bijp...@gmail.com

Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:02:08 
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 -extended- low end Bass response back in next beta
 release



This is strange...

A lot of people (including me) have noticed and pointed out K3's initial
lack of LF response compared to other sets. Also, a lot of energy has been
put into finding causesremedies both by users and developers.

Now *a solution* is presented as a pleasant coincedental combination of FW
data.

Is the K3 really starting to make its own decisions for the future beyond
control of its talented fathers?
Or is this an Okay, you guys out there were quite right about this LF
matter in disguise?

In any case:Happy to hear those vocal cord frequencies coming through
now...A huge step forward.
Tnx for the hard work.

73'
Paul
PD0PSB



















Eric Swartz -WA6HHQ, Elecraft wrote:
 
 For those of you that noticed the unexpected increase in low end bass 
 response in the last release, and then its removal in the current 
 release, stay tuned. We are properly including it in in the next beta 
 release.
 
 In the prior beta test release it was an unexpected bug/side effect that 
 only appeared with the .1 Hz setting of the PBT control. We were 
 pleasantly surprised at this and are now properly adding it so it is 
 available in general.
 
 73, Eric
 
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n2.nabble.com/K3-extended-low-end-Bass-response-back-in-next-beta-release-tp3535988p3536743.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3 - Hardware needed P3

2009-08-25 Thread dave . wilburn
Thanks for the notice of the price increase. With that in mind, will additional 
hardware be needed on the K3?

David Wilburn
NM4M 
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 P3 thought

2009-08-19 Thread dave . wilburn
That would be impressive. You would not need it all the time.  Could have a 
high isolation RF coax switch to switch it in when needed.

David Wilburn
NM4M 
--Original Message--
From: Bob W9RFS
Sender: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 P3 thought
Sent: Aug 19, 2009 01:26



Being able to use the P3 as a station monitor durring TX would be great!
Could it be possible to see the RF envelope; modulation; RF
compression/clipping?
Could be a very nice tool.
Bob W9RFS
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n2.nabble.com/K3-P3-thought-tp3468007p3470510.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] P3 display of K3 filter bandwidth and other information

2009-08-17 Thread dave . wilburn
Don't stop, I'm getting all tingly.

David Wilburn
NM4M 
--Original Message--
From: Wayne Burdick
Sender: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
To: Elecraft Reflector
Subject: [Elecraft] P3 display of K3 filter bandwidth and other information
Sent: Aug 17, 2009 14:58

The P3 is connected to the K3 at a point ahead of the crystal filters,  
so when you change crystal filters on the K3, it won't change the P3's  
displayed waveform.

However, the P3 will be aware of the K3's filter bandwidth and offset,  
so we can show a bracketed or otherwise highlighted area on the P3  
display that reflects the filter settings. We could show both the DSP  
and crystal bandwidth using different colors.

Going farther out on a limb: The P3 could highlight ham-band edges and  
band segments, even by license class, programmable by country. It  
could mix spectral and waterfall displays with decoded text. You could  
assign a function switch as an auto-tune switch for PSK31 -- etc.,  
etc. (Somebody stop me!)

73,
Wayne
N6KR

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Heavy P3

2009-08-17 Thread dave . wilburn
Are the dimensions firm enough that you can release them? I'm re-org'ing the 
shack and I want to leave enoug room.

David Wilburn
NM4M 
--Original Message--
From: Ralph Parker
Sender: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] Heavy P3
Sent: Aug 17, 2009 15:51

... P3 Elecraft could provide an internal 1 kw dummy load. 

Or maybe a colour-coordinated brick? ('color' for US readers)

I'd tend to put the P3 on the left, so it would be in front of my face
while I tuned the K3 with my right hand. For those of you yet to experience
a spectral display, I think you'll find that you watch it more than the
frequency display.

VE7XF

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] P3 Photo

2009-08-16 Thread dave . wilburn
http://www.elecraft.com/K3/pics/P3%20w%20K3%20a.JPG

David Wilburn
NM4M 
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-Original Message-
From: Jorge Diez - CX6VM cx6vm.jo...@adinet.com.uy

Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 10:04:34 
To: 'Paul Christensen'w...@arrl.net; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] P3 Photo


Hello,

where is a link to see the P3? 

I am in www.elecraft.com but not find photos of the P3.

73,
Jorge
CX6VM

-Mensaje original-
De: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] En nombre de Paul Christensen
Enviado el: Domingo, 16 de Agosto de 2009 08:37 a.m.
Para: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Asunto: Re: [Elecraft] P3 Photo

Although the P3 product is still in development,  it looks like a very
attractive and functional matching accessory for the K3.  A few questions:

-  What is the typical MDS seen on the display?
-  Is a low-noise, unity-gain buffer w/ BPF utilized at the I.F. input?
-  Assuming it's powered from the K3 or alternate +12VDC source, what is the
measured amount of current (thinking ahead for portable operation)?
- Any photos of the tentative back panel available?

Although I probably would have opted for a stand-alone black box device
(and hoping that may be an alternate version one day), I can see the
marketing logic where a large number of potential purchasers are looking for
a transceiver with a built-in panadapter.  Even though the P3 is a
stand-alone unit, it appears to be well-integrated with the K3 to give it a
built-in look and feel.  This should put the K3 in the running for buyers
who would otherwise purchase the K3 but for the fact that it lacks a
built-in panadapter.

Paul, W9AC 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 new V3.25 NR not so good for CW week signal

2009-08-15 Thread dave . wilburn
What is the best way of determining the gain setting?  Seem to recall an app 
for this. 

David Wilburn
NM4M 
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-Original Message-
From: Brett Howard br...@livecomputers.com

Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 15:51:46 
To: Merv Schweigertk...@flex.com
Cc: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 new V3.25 NR not so good for CW week signal


Not saying I'd do it.  (and I'm not with the 8 filters I have in my
radio) but one can if thats what they wish to do.

~Brett

On Sat, 2009-08-15 at 12:42 -1000, Merv Schweigert wrote:
 Not really,  if you read the recommendations for the filters you will
 notice 
 that caution is warranted for setting the gain higher than
 recommended, 
 for IMD prevention if I remember correct.   Kind of like the Inrad
 roofing
 filters,  in some cases the gain is set to high and causes more IMD
 than
 without the filter. 
 Some Inrad roofers for the FT-1000D had too much gain and the radio
 was worse with them installed than without.  W8JI had some
 measurements
 on those issues.  
 Merv KH7C
  This is sorta already there if you have multiple roofing filters.  You
  can define the gain that is added when each filter kicks in.
  
  
  On Sat, 2009-08-15 at 13:50 -0600, William Carver wrote:

   I've noticed in homebrew receivers as the bandwidth narrowed, shedding
   noise and QRM I preferred the gain to go up, increaseing the in-passband
   signal amplitude. I always attributed it to formative years with a
   Heathkit Q multiplier. It may be an effect similar to AGC with
   adjustable flatness (May 1996 analog circuit, in DSP of K3). I found I
   preferred to have strong signals sound louder rather than perfectly
   flat. Prolly a psycho-acoustic explanation (or maybe just get my head
   examined?).
   
   In firmware one could increase the audio gain by an adjustable amount as
   the IF bandwidth was decreased, with an operator-settable scaling
   number. Say 0 = gain independent of bandwidth, to 100 = gain multiplied
   by K * (2800/DSP bandwidth). Very similar to the AGC rise scaling. That
   sounds good to me.
   
   
   
   __
   Elecraft mailing list
   Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
   Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
   Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
   
   This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
   Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
   
  
  __
  Elecraft mailing list
  Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
  Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
  Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
  
  This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
  Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
  

 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 new V3.25 NR not so good for CW week signal

2009-08-15 Thread dave . wilburn
I understand where to set the values.  I'm asking how to empirically determine 
the value to use?

David Wilburn
NM4M 
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-Original Message-
From: Brett Howard br...@livecomputers.com

Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 19:19:02 
To: dave.wilb...@verizon.net
Cc: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net; Merv Schweigertk...@flex.com; 
Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 new V3.25 NR not so good for CW week signal


You can pull this off by looking at the filter setup in the K3Config
utility or you can find it in the menu of the K3.

~Brett (KC7OTG)

On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 02:12 +, dave.wilb...@verizon.net wrote:
 What is the best way of determining the gain setting?  Seem to recall an app 
 for this. 
 
 David Wilburn
 NM4M 
 Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Brett Howard br...@livecomputers.com
 
 Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 15:51:46 
 To: Merv Schweigertk...@flex.com
 Cc: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 new V3.25 NR not so good for CW week signal
 
 
 Not saying I'd do it.  (and I'm not with the 8 filters I have in my
 radio) but one can if thats what they wish to do.
 
 ~Brett
 
 On Sat, 2009-08-15 at 12:42 -1000, Merv Schweigert wrote:
  Not really,  if you read the recommendations for the filters you will
  notice 
  that caution is warranted for setting the gain higher than
  recommended, 
  for IMD prevention if I remember correct.   Kind of like the Inrad
  roofing
  filters,  in some cases the gain is set to high and causes more IMD
  than
  without the filter. 
  Some Inrad roofers for the FT-1000D had too much gain and the radio
  was worse with them installed than without.  W8JI had some
  measurements
  on those issues.  
  Merv KH7C
   This is sorta already there if you have multiple roofing filters.  You
   can define the gain that is added when each filter kicks in.
   
   
   On Sat, 2009-08-15 at 13:50 -0600, William Carver wrote:
 
I've noticed in homebrew receivers as the bandwidth narrowed, shedding
noise and QRM I preferred the gain to go up, increaseing the in-passband
signal amplitude. I always attributed it to formative years with a
Heathkit Q multiplier. It may be an effect similar to AGC with
adjustable flatness (May 1996 analog circuit, in DSP of K3). I found I
preferred to have strong signals sound louder rather than perfectly
flat. Prolly a psycho-acoustic explanation (or maybe just get my head
examined?).

In firmware one could increase the audio gain by an adjustable amount as
the IF bandwidth was decreased, with an operator-settable scaling
number. Say 0 = gain independent of bandwidth, to 100 = gain multiplied
by K * (2800/DSP bandwidth). Very similar to the AGC rise scaling. That
sounds good to me.



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

   
   __
   Elecraft mailing list
   Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
   Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
   Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
   
   This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
   Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
   
 
  
 
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 new V3.25 NR not so good for CW week signal

2009-08-15 Thread dave . wilburn
Tnx

David Wilburn
NM4M 
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-Original Message-
From: Merv Schweigert k...@flex.com

Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 16:29:47 
To: dave.wilb...@verizon.net
Cc: Brett Howardbr...@livecomputers.com; elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net; 
Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 new V3.25 NR not so good for CW week signal


dave.wilb...@verizon.net wrote:
 What is the best way of determining the gain setting?  Seem to recall an app 
 for this. 

 David Wilburn
 NM4M 
 Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

   
Perhaps this is what you were looking for Dave, 


  [Elecraft] On K3 crystal filter gain compensation (FLx GN)

wayne burdick
Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:26:43 -0700

Lately there has been some discussion about how much gain to add when 
compensating for loss in the K3's individual crystal filters. The 
general guideline is as little as possible. I'd suggest starting with 
0 and working up to as high as a few dB only if it seems necessary.

Narrow bandwidths themselves create a psychoacoustic gain effect, so 
you don't really have to make up for the entire loss relative to wide 
filters. Also, excessive gain can in extreme cases worsen the 
performance of DSP signal processing, such as noise reduction (NR). 
Finally, AGC tends to flatten signal amplitudes in general, further 
reducing the need for per-filter compensation.

While I'm on this topic, I'd also like to suggest using a minimum of 
both RX and TX EQ. The '0' levels were carefully determined 
empirically, and in most cases the optimal values will be well below 
the maximum range provided. Unless you have an aural sensitivity issue 
in some pitch range, or a serious mic deficiency, I'd stay between +/- 
6 dB. As with filter gain settings, excessive values can result in 
adverse interaction with the DSP.

And yes, there will be per-mode RX EQ in a future firmware revision. 
Thanks for all the suggestions on this.

73,
Wayne
N6KR



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 new V3.25 NR not so good for CW week signal

2009-08-15 Thread dave . wilburn
Sounds good. Tnx

David Wilburn
NM4M 
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-Original Message-
From: Brett Howard br...@livecomputers.com

Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 20:21:22 
To: dave.wilb...@verizon.net
Cc: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net; Merv Schweigertk...@flex.com; 
Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 new V3.25 NR not so good for CW week signal


Well you can follow the convention that is mentioned I believe in the
manual and use the values outlined there.  Or find a steady signal on
the air (or connect a signal generator) and use the AFV feature to
determine the level and detect the reduction in signal level as you
adjust through the filters and then you'll know how many dB delta you
have between filters. 

~Brett

PS:  The real answer to this question is to put in as little gain as it
takes to make you happy and no more.  The less you can use the better.

On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 02:45 +, dave.wilb...@verizon.net wrote:
 I understand where to set the values.  I'm asking how to empirically 
 determine the value to use?
 
 David Wilburn
 NM4M 
 Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Brett Howard br...@livecomputers.com
 
 Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 19:19:02 
 To: dave.wilb...@verizon.net
 Cc: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net; Merv Schweigertk...@flex.com; 
 Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 new V3.25 NR not so good for CW week signal
 
 
 You can pull this off by looking at the filter setup in the K3Config
 utility or you can find it in the menu of the K3.
 
 ~Brett (KC7OTG)
 
 On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 02:12 +, dave.wilb...@verizon.net wrote:
  What is the best way of determining the gain setting?  Seem to recall an 
  app for this. 
  
  David Wilburn
  NM4M 
  Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Brett Howard br...@livecomputers.com
  
  Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 15:51:46 
  To: Merv Schweigertk...@flex.com
  Cc: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
  Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 new V3.25 NR not so good for CW week signal
  
  
  Not saying I'd do it.  (and I'm not with the 8 filters I have in my
  radio) but one can if thats what they wish to do.
  
  ~Brett
  
  On Sat, 2009-08-15 at 12:42 -1000, Merv Schweigert wrote:
   Not really,  if you read the recommendations for the filters you will
   notice 
   that caution is warranted for setting the gain higher than
   recommended, 
   for IMD prevention if I remember correct.   Kind of like the Inrad
   roofing
   filters,  in some cases the gain is set to high and causes more IMD
   than
   without the filter. 
   Some Inrad roofers for the FT-1000D had too much gain and the radio
   was worse with them installed than without.  W8JI had some
   measurements
   on those issues.  
   Merv KH7C
This is sorta already there if you have multiple roofing filters.  You
can define the gain that is added when each filter kicks in.


On Sat, 2009-08-15 at 13:50 -0600, William Carver wrote:
  
 I've noticed in homebrew receivers as the bandwidth narrowed, shedding
 noise and QRM I preferred the gain to go up, increaseing the 
 in-passband
 signal amplitude. I always attributed it to formative years with a
 Heathkit Q multiplier. It may be an effect similar to AGC with
 adjustable flatness (May 1996 analog circuit, in DSP of K3). I found I
 preferred to have strong signals sound louder rather than perfectly
 flat. Prolly a psycho-acoustic explanation (or maybe just get my head
 examined?).
 
 In firmware one could increase the audio gain by an adjustable amount 
 as
 the IF bandwidth was decreased, with an operator-settable scaling
 number. Say 0 = gain independent of bandwidth, to 100 = gain 
 multiplied
 by K * (2800/DSP bandwidth). Very similar to the AGC rise scaling. 
 That
 sounds good to me.
 
 
 
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

  
   
  
  __
  Elecraft mailing list
  Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
  Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
  Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
  
  This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
  Please help support this email 

Re: [Elecraft] P3 Critics

2009-08-13 Thread dave . wilburn
I understand the sentiment, but Elecraft does want to hear the good and the 
bad. This is what makes them different.

As they have aptly stated, they are big boys (no slight meant to lisa ans 
company) and they can take.

I look forward to a panadaptor in most any iteration. I haven't seen one since 
I worked on them on B52G/H's.

David Wilburn
NM4M 
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-Original Message-
From: Bill Miner w...@yahoo.com

Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:17:45 
To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] P3 Critics



It is amazing to me how there can be so much criticism of the P3 before it has 
even been put into production and released for sale 
 
 
The P3 is fully integrated with the K3, and stand-alone (no computer
needed). It's the same height and depth as the K3, and about 6 wide
-- plenty of extra room inside for a power supply, battery, or other
accessories. The display is fast and bright, with a very wide viewing
angle.

73,
Wayne, N6KR
Eric, WA6HHQ
 
 
 
THANKS Wayne and Eric.  That is just exactly what I was hoping for.  Sounds 
PERFECT.
 Can't wait to get one!
 
73,
Bill - K6WLM
KX1
K2
K3/100

 
 
The following is a quote from a recent eHam review:
 
Which brings me to another issue. While I commend Elecraft for its customer 
service, it appears that the K3 is now being designed to satisfy the squeaky 
wheels on the reflector. There seems to be a large number of owners who want a 
custom radio, and will stop at nothing in order to get the company to change 
the firmware so it suits their individual tastes. It seems as though the 
firmware beta changes are arriving more and more frequently. This is both good 
and bad. While it is nice to see the improvements, I think that it is getting 
to be a little overwhelming (and wonder about the utility of many of the 
improvements). It appears that many are to simply satisfy the vocal minority. 
I'd rather see Elecraft survey its entire user base as to what things might be 
changed, rather than the (highly) vocal few that populate the reflector.



  
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Off-Topic: CW sending vs. receiving speed

2009-08-07 Thread dave . wilburn
I fully agree. I'm fairly new (in comparison) at this. My sweet spot 18 wpm. If 
the speed creeps up and we wander from the basics, I get in trouble quick.

Luckily I can't yet send much faster than I can receive.

73

David Wilburn
NM4M 
--Original Message--
From: Ricky Robbins
Sender: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
To: Elecraft_List
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Off-Topic: CW sending vs. receiving speed
Sent: Aug 7, 2009 13:50

 Is it logical to assume that a person's CW sending speed approximates
 their copy speed?

Well, it's *logical* - that just doesn't always mean it's true.  :)

After a long period of inactivity, my copy speed right now is about 10
wpm, but I can send considerably faster and I have to keep reminding
myself to send at about 10 wpm to avoid getting it sent back to me at
a faster speed than I can copy.

I can copy faster than 10 wpm when receiving the standard RST, Name,
QTH, Rig, etc., but if you start telling me about your late
grandmother's bursitis woes or the cabbage worm grief in your garden I
probably won't be able to keep up.

The problem is when I'm sending with a straight key I tend to creep up
in speed without realizing it, get it back at the faster speed, and
then cut QSO's short because I always feel it's impolite to ask the
other fellow to QRS when *I'm* the one who sped us up in the first
place.

The aforementioned ticks me off (at myself), because I'm a ragchewer
and when we move off of the formula and get into cabbage  grandmas is
when I start getting more interested in the di-dahversation.

I keep thinking the speed will come back, but I don't think it's
coming back at the rate it came originally some thirty years ago.

Rick
N4YQP
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Off-Topic: CW sending vs. recieving speed

2009-08-07 Thread dave . wilburn
Your inability to perceive the problem is (likely) directly proportional to the 
years you have been doing code. ;)

I did code mobile for the first time recently. Coming back from dropping my son 
off at Camp Lejeune. It was the New Eng. QSO party.  My paddles were the 
buttons on the mic of a 706.  It was lots of listening up front. Then just 
reply to their call.

I didn't try running a freq while driving.  You have to save something to shoot 
for.

David Wilburn
NM4M 
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-Original Message-
From: .k8dd. k...@inbox.com

Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:43:55 
To: Grant Youngmann...@tx.rr.com
Cc: Elecraft_List Reflectorelecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Off-Topic:  CW sending vs. recieving speed


I've never understood that line of thought.
Why would you take target practice at little tykes?  That's unreal.

On the other hand people will talk on cell phones while driving and 
people will pick up a microphone and talk on 2m.  That's all ok.  But 
talk about talking on cw . You don't have a cell phone or a 
microphone to drop if things go wrong - just take your hand off the key 
or paddle and let it sit there.
And what's the difference between copying phone or CW in your head? 
That's not an argument either!
I've just never understood the comments that get made about mobile CW.

73 :^]
HankK8DD



Grant Youngman wrote:
 Hmmm .. I can't use my cell phone when driving through a school zone  
 here, even with a hands-free.  I wonder if I could get away with  
 taking target practice at the little tykes walking to school while  
 sending mobile CW :-)
 
 Grant/NQ5T
 
 always sent around 25-30 WPM. I could never send as well as I could  
 copy
 when mobile, due to the car bouncing off potholes, other vehicles,  
 etc.
 ;-) As I got older, my sending speed fell below my copy speed even at
 home.  Regardless, unless I get a QRS request, I assume someone
 answering my CQ can copy the speed I used.



GET FREE 5GB EMAIL - Check out spam free email with many cool features!
Visit http://www.inbox.com/email to find out more!
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] kool-aid

2009-07-31 Thread dave . wilburn
Oh Yyya!! ((Que Koolaid guy busting through wall)

I got my mat at Radio Shack

David Wilburn
NM4M 


--Original Message--
From: travistowns...@sbcglobal.net
Sender: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
ReplyTo: travistowns...@sbcglobal.net
Subject: [Elecraft] kool-aid
Sent: Jul 31, 2009 14:43

i think i may have just drank the kool- aid. i placed my order for a k3. dale 
is a most helpful gentleman!! i am coming to the k3 from a ft one. my first 
question to the list is where in the world can a fellar get an anti-static mat? 
i have looked at digikey and mouser both. i am either looking in the wrong 
places or they don't have any. a good day to all!73's
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] RTTY Dual PB

2009-07-22 Thread dave . wilburn
The first time I used it I was able to dig out one rtty signal that was mixed 
in with another that was on a slightly different freq. Though I have not been 
successful with it since then. 

Dave Wilburn
NM4M
--Original Message--
From: k...@aol.com
Sender: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] RTTY Dual PB
Sent: Jul 22, 2009 16:30

My question addresses RTTY (FSK D) and the Dual PB capability.

I understand the theory of what is being done, but I have yet to see the 
advantage of Dual PB on an RTTY signal as opposed to normal passband.

I am curious if any of the RTTY ops have seen a definite advantage of using 
Dual PB over normal passband tuning.

73, Steve, K4FJ
K3 #290
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Simple question about the K2

2009-07-19 Thread dave . wilburn
Rotate the knob titled keyer.

Dave Wilburn
NM4M
--Original Message--
From: Hector Padron
Sender: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] Simple question about the K2
Sent: Jul 19, 2009 11:15

Maybe I am blind but I have been reading the factory manual and also the nifty 
manual that came with my K2 that arrived yesterday morning and I am really 
enchanted with it but I can't find anywhere how to change the CW keyer speed,I 
am a qsk op and I need to set it up faster,can anyone tell me how to set it up? 
Thanks
 
AD4C
 


The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits.. 
-- Albert Einstein


  
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] [K2] K2 S meter

2009-07-18 Thread dave . wilburn
One possibility, there was a mod that setup one of the LEDs to flash when u are 
zero beat.

Dave Wilburn
NM4M 
--Original Message--
From: pkhjr
Sender: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] [K2]  K2 S meter
Sent: Jul 18, 2009 19:36


I'm the new owner of a K2 (4864) which I did not build and love the radio. 
Everything works as it should from what I can tell so far.  One question on
the S Meter, the far right led or 40 over led seems to flash most of the
time in CW not so much in SSB.  Can't seem to find anything in the manuals. 
Did the Cal for meter no change?
Tnx
Tex
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n2.nabble.com/K2-S-meter-tp3282589p3282589.html
Sent from the [K2] mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Happy New Year

2007-12-31 Thread Dave Wilburn

Don Wilhelm wrote:
I know this is 3 hours early for those on the left coast,  but we 
greeted 2008 a few minutes ago here in North Carolina.


Best wishes for a Happy and prosperous New Year to us all.

73,
Don W3FPR

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm

Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


73 es hpy nw yr
de k4dgw

Dave Wilburn
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com