Re: [Elecraft] [OT] Be Advised ... New Microsoft Outlook Email Spam-Filter False-Positives Bug!

2014-03-24 Thread Bill W2BLC

Please let the group know when this problem is corrected - thanks.

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] [OT] Be Advised ... New Microsoft Outlook Email Spam-Filter False-Positives Bug!

2014-03-24 Thread Gary W. Hvizdak
Late last night I posted ...
... I sent it to myself on a whim, only to find that it was misidentified
as spam.  Eventually I was able to determine that the culprit was my
callsign on the signature line!

--- - - - ---

Concerned that my initial bug report would only be processes automatically
-- such that no one would see that I essentially included the code fix in my
report -- I just spent 70 minutes on the phone with Microsoft.

It took that long because I had to speak with five people before reaching
someone (named Reden) who was able to comprehend what I was saying.  He said
he would send my regular expression code to the Outlook spam-filter software
developers, adding that he did not yet know how to do that!

73,
Gary
[Callsign omitted to avoid Microsoft Outlook spam filter false-positives.]

P.S.  Having since learned that this issue was reported a week ago, it's
likely Microsoft has already written their own solution.


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] [OT] Be Advised ... New Microsoft Outlook Email Spam-Filter False-Positives Bug!

2014-03-23 Thread Gary W. Hvizdak
This past week I emailed someone (Bob in Germany) but he didn't reply so a
few days later I emailed him again.  Upon replying to my second email, Bob
indicated that he never received my first email!

Fast-forward to this evening, while tweaking my next (700 Hz filter)
Reflector post, I sent it to myself on a whim, only to find that it was
misidentified as spam.  Eventually I was able to determine that the culprit
was my callsign on the signature line!

I've already reported this issue to Microsoft, and as luck would have it, I
had previously written the necessary regular expression code (see below)
to identify any valid amateur radio callsign, so I provided that as well.
Even though my code should save them many hours of research, coding, and
testing; there's still no telling when or even if this recently introduced
bug will be corrected!

I mention this because it's unlikely mine is the only amateur radio callsign
being misidentified by Microsoft Outlook's spam filter!

73,
Gary Hvizdak
(callsign omitted so that this message isn't mistakenly flagged as spam by
Microsoft Outlook)

--- - - - ---

My regular expression code to identify any amateur radio callsign (hopefully
it won't cause a false-positive) ...

   $us_1x23_2x123  =
((^[KNW][0-9][A-Z]{2,3}$)|(^((A[A-L])|([KNW][A-Z]))[0-9][A-Z]{1,3}$));

   $dx_12x23   =
(^(([ACDLPST][2-9])|([E][2-4])|([H][2-46-9])|([JV][2-8])|([Z][2-3])|([2-9][
A-Z])|([A][M-Z])|([B-JLMO-VXYZ][A-Z]?))[0-9][A-Z]{2,3}$);

   $dx_23x12   =
(^(([ACDLPST][2-9][A-Z])|([E][2-4][A-Z])|([H][2-46-9][A-Z])|([JV][2-8][A-Z]
)|([Z][2-3][A-Z])|([2-9][A-Z]{2})|([A][M-Z][A-Z]?)|([B-JLMO-VXYZ][A-Z]{1,2})
)[0-9][A-Z]{1,2}$);

   $any_call_regex = ~ . $us_1x23_2x123 . | . $dx_12x23 . | .
$dx_23x12 . ~;


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com