[Elecraft] Anderson Connectors

2013-06-26 Thread Art Bross
Your probably not making sure the pins are flat when inserting into the 
housings. The pin should just snap over the internal SS spring. The pin should 
just rest on the spring but not press it down. Look at the business end of the 
Powerpoles. If the surface of the silver pin does not stick up above the 
plastic face by at least 3/32 to 1/8 inch then take a small screwdriver and 
insert it down between the pin and the front of the housing. Bend the pin up 
but not so much to make it leave the spring. It should just rest on top of it 
with no downward pressure. If you pre-load the spring by pressing the spring 
down you will loose some of the holding power. You may have to make this 
adjustment on brand new one if the maker didn't pay attention.  I check mine 
when they start feeling loose. One sign of miss-adjustment is that there is no 
snap when they are put together.

For those of you who keep puling them apart, a short piece of 12 gauge bre wire 
bent into a U shape and inserted into the two roll pin holes makes a good and 
inexpensive locking link. I don't use the roll pins because everyone knows they 
will drop out and seek the the one place in the radio where they can do the 
most damage. Use a spot of Superglue between the housings when assembling. Why 
would you ever want to take them apart?

There is some fine nuances to   PowerPoles and getting them right. Not as 
simple as some people might think. But then , what do I know, I've only built a 
few thousand of them.

Art - KC7GF
Rfstuff.com


Message: 3
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 08:08:42 -0400
From: david Moes dm...@nexicom.net
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Anderson Connector
Message-ID: 51cad9ca.3010...@nexicom.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

10 Lbs?  Ive used APP for years and I am quite satisfied the whole shack 
is done that way. however Ive never had one set strong enough that I 
think could dangle the weight of the K3 let alone a full 10lbswhat 
am I doing wrong?

David Moes

dm...@nexicom.net
VE3DVY
Art

KC7GF


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Anderson Connectors ARES Standard

2004-06-28 Thread Trent - N7GMT
Exactly correct:

Red on LEFT looking *into* the connectors (from the pluggable side), or
Red on RIGHT looking down the wire *at* the connectors.

Tonuge down in either case.

These are known as California Reverse Anderson Polarity compliant ARES
connectors (since CA chose to use ahem a different configuration for
Anderson Powerpoles for their ARES connectors, than had previously been
chosen -- and implemented many years earlier -- other ARES groups in
other states.  CA is bigger, and bigger aparently rules, I guess.)


- Original Message - 
From: Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 11:03
Subject: [Elecraft] Anderson Connectors ARES Standard


The correct connection is while looking down at the connectors to have
RED
RIGHT TONGUE DOWN.

Looking at the front end of the connectors the RED will be on the left
and
the TONGUE will be down. That is how the pre wired cable extensions  and
Rig Runners are wired.

Robert
WN7O








---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.711 / Virus Database: 467 - Release Date: 6/25/04







___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraftHelp:
http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraftHelp:  
http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Anderson Connectors ARES Standard

2004-06-28 Thread Rich Lentz
If California is different than the standard, then why is it the same as the
Rig Runner?  Also Isn't Aptos in CA?  Then why did he chose not to follow
the CA standard?  Also, why doesn't Rig Runner sell different versions for
CA? 

Now that you are thoroughly confused I think you will realize there is no
difference or different standard.


Rich,
KE0X



These are known as California Reverse Anderson Polarity compliant ARES
connectors (since CA chose to use ahem a different configuration for
Anderson Powerpoles for their ARES connectors, than had previously been
chosen -- and implemented many years earlier -- other ARES groups in other
states.  CA is bigger, and bigger aparently rules, I guess.)


-

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraftHelp:  
http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Anderson Connectors ARES Standard

2004-06-28 Thread Trent - N7GMT
SORRY! to all for the confusion:

The way RigRunner, ARES, and everyone else does it *IS* the (new)
standard -- red-on-right looking down the wire towards the connector
(tongue down), or tongue-top-red-right looking at the connectors
(another mnemonic I was recently given).

What I was saying (tongue in cheek -- no pun intended) was that when CA
decided to standardize on Anderson Powerpoles for their ARES connectors
back some years ago, they chose one of two possible ways to have the
uni-sex connectors aligned ... and they chose opposite to what some
ARES groups had *been* using for many years previous -- but the CA ARES
format got accepted by national ARES as the standard.

So, TTRR (tongue top red right) works (looking at connector), red-right
looking down the wire, make 'em match a RigRunner, whatever mnemonic you
want to use, they're the same ... now.

[We've had lots of rewiring to do in our local ARES group to match the
(newer to us) standard, so yes there *was* actually a different
standard -- dating back  30 years, I've let myself be told -- but we're
bowing to National ARES because it's better for everyone.]

MAKE 'EM MATCH A RIG-RUNNER AND YOU'VE GOT IT RIGHT. :)

Again, sorry for throwing chaos into the ring.

73 de Trent - N7GMT


- Original Message - 
From: Rich Lentz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Trent - N7GMT' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; elecraft@mailman.qth.net;
'Robert' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 17:49
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] Anderson Connectors ARES Standard


If California is different than the standard, then why is it the same as
the
Rig Runner?  Also Isn't Aptos in CA?  Then why did he chose not to
follow
the CA standard?  Also, why doesn't Rig Runner sell different versions
for
CA?

Now that you are thoroughly confused I think you will realize there is
no
difference or different standard.


Rich,
KE0X



These are known as California Reverse Anderson Polarity compliant ARES
connectors (since CA chose to use ahem a different configuration for
Anderson Powerpoles for their ARES connectors, than had previously been
chosen -- and implemented many years earlier -- other ARES groups in
other
states.  CA is bigger, and bigger aparently rules, I guess.)


-

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraftHelp:  
http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com