Re: [Elecraft] K2 INFO 232

2018-04-20 Thread EricJ
OK, thanks, Don. As I said, I went into this perfectly happy with how 
the K2 is performing. I have SN 6911 right beside it and find no 
discernible difference between the two. Both are solid. I just wanted to 
verify the alignment after 13 years of use and refamiliarize myself with 
the internals.


Eric KE6US



On 4/19/2018 9:32 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote:

Erik,

Your K2 has the A to B updates, do NOT put X2 in!
For Firmware level 2.01 and above, CAL PLL is done only on 40 meters 
(for all bands).  If attempted on other bands, you will get an INFO 
232 error.


Use the information in the newer manual - the older manual has 
information *only* applicable to K2s that have not been upgraded.


73,
Don W3FPR

On 4/19/2018 10:18 PM, EricJ wrote:
I have K2 SN 567. I didn't really have a problem with it, but I 
bought it used in 2005, had W3FPR look at it then, and install latest 
mods to bring it up to date. Today, I thought it might be time to 
take a look at alignment, and freshen it up a bit.


When I did the "PLL Ref Osc Range Test" in Alignment Part II, the 
range was slightly less than 6 kHz. When I got to "VFO 
Linearization", 40 meters was fine without any INFO messages.


I was using the original Rev B manual (not related to RevB board) 
that came with it. Under Part III, Alignment and Test there is 
another "VFO Linearization (All Bands)". I did that and every band 
failed (INFO 232) except 40 meters. And of course, in the Rev B 
manual, there is no INFO 232 only 235. Anyway, I checked around Q19 
as the Troubleshooting suggested and found X1, but no X2. After 
reading the circuit operation, I was convinced somehow X2 got left 
out. Since it was supposed to be there to prevent the very short 
range problem I thought I was experiencing, I thought I had found the 
problem.


I emailed Elecraft to order X2, and got a nice note from Mike saying 
they would send one out no charge. That kind of service still amazes 
me. But I told him to hold off until I can hear from this group.


I checked my other K2 manual (I also have SN 6911), and, first, it 
does not have a procedure for VFO linearization on anything but 40 
meters. In fact, it says INFO 232 probably occurred because I wasn't 
on 40m. And the parts lists says X2 is not used!


I went into this without having any actual problem or complaint. The 
old manual convinced me I did. The later Rev I manual says I might, 
but didn't know it. I'm supposed to have a PLL range of 9.8 to 15 
kHz. I have 5.97 kHz.


So if that is a problem, the problem is associated with Q19 which is 
a very simple stage. X1 is probably the most likely cause. Any ideas?


Also, since two crystals were originally used to "de-Q one another to 
increase the tuning range", what was done to make two crystals 
unnecessary?


Thanks for any help,
Eric KE6US


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to donw...@embarqmail.com





__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] K2 INFO 232

2018-04-20 Thread hawley, charles j jr
Thanks. I did do this.
Appreciate the help remembering.

Chuck Jack 
KE9UW

Sent from my iPhone, cjack 

> On Apr 20, 2018, at 8:49 AM, Don Wilhelm  wrote:
> 
> Chuck,
> 
> If you are referring to the X1/X2 situation rather then the CAL PLL band, 
> even the rev B boards have silkscreen and holes for X2, but X2 is left open.  
> The BFOMDKT and the Thermistor mod replace X1 and remove X2.
> The basic A to B mods do not, but those mod kits are a part of the overall A 
> to B mods.
> 
> 73,
> Don W3FPR
> 
>> On 4/20/2018 8:27 AM, hawley, charles j jr wrote:
>> So A to B upgrades but not necessarily the rev B board?
>> 
>> Chuck Jack
>> KE9UW
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone, cjack
>> 
>>> On Apr 19, 2018, at 11:32 PM, Don Wilhelm  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Erik,
>>> 
>>> Your K2 has the A to B updates, do NOT put X2 in!
>>> For Firmware level 2.01 and above, CAL PLL is done only on 40 meters (for 
>>> all bands).  If attempted on other bands, you will get an INFO 232 error.
>>> 
>>> Use the information in the newer manual - the older manual has information 
>>> *only* applicable to K2s that have not been upgraded.
>>> 
>>> 73,
>>> Don W3FPR
>>> 
 On 4/19/2018 10:18 PM, EricJ wrote:
 I have K2 SN 567. I didn't really have a problem with it, but I bought it 
 used in 2005, had W3FPR look at it then, and install latest mods to bring 
 it up to date. Today, I thought it might be time to take a look at 
 alignment, and freshen it up a bit.
 When I did the "PLL Ref Osc Range Test" in Alignment Part II, the range 
 was slightly less than 6 kHz. When I got to "VFO Linearization", 40 meters 
 was fine without any INFO messages.
 I was using the original Rev B manual (not related to RevB board) that 
 came with it. Under Part III, Alignment and Test there is another "VFO 
 Linearization (All Bands)". I did that and every band failed (INFO 232) 
 except 40 meters. And of course, in the Rev B manual, there is no INFO 232 
 only 235. Anyway, I checked around Q19 as the Troubleshooting suggested 
 and found X1, but no X2. After reading the circuit operation, I was 
 convinced somehow X2 got left out. Since it was supposed to be there to 
 prevent the very short range problem I thought I was experiencing, I 
 thought I had found the problem.
 I emailed Elecraft to order X2, and got a nice note from Mike saying they 
 would send one out no charge. That kind of service still amazes me. But I 
 told him to hold off until I can hear from this group.
 I checked my other K2 manual (I also have SN 6911), and, first, it does 
 not have a procedure for VFO linearization on anything but 40 meters. In 
 fact, it says INFO 232 probably occurred because I wasn't on 40m. And the 
 parts lists says X2 is not used!
 I went into this without having any actual problem or complaint. The old 
 manual convinced me I did. The later Rev I manual says I might, but didn't 
 know it. I'm supposed to have a PLL range of 9.8 to 15 kHz. I have 5.97 
 kHz.
 So if that is a problem, the problem is associated with Q19 which is a 
 very simple stage. X1 is probably the most likely cause. Any ideas?
 Also, since two crystals were originally used to "de-Q one another to 
 increase the tuning range", what was done to make two crystals unnecessary?
 Thanks for any help,
 Eric KE6US
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 Message delivered to donw...@embarqmail.com
>>> __
>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>> 
>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>> Message delivered to c-haw...@illinois.edu
> 
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2 INFO 232

2018-04-20 Thread Don Wilhelm

Chuck and all,

Sorry if I confused you.  It is the firmware level, not the upgrades or 
the board level.
Firmware 2.01 and above must do CAL PLL on 40 meters.  That calibrates 
it for all bands.


The early manuals tell you to do CAL PLL on each band, but if the 
firmware has been updated, the instructions for the updated firmware can 
supersede the earlier instructions in the manual.


73,
Don W3FPR

On 4/20/2018 8:27 AM, hawley, charles j jr wrote:

So A to B upgrades but not necessarily the rev B board?

Chuck Jack
KE9UW

Sent from my iPhone, cjack


On Apr 19, 2018, at 11:32 PM, Don Wilhelm  wrote:

Erik,

Your K2 has the A to B updates, do NOT put X2 in!
For Firmware level 2.01 and above, CAL PLL is done only on 40 meters (for all 
bands).  If attempted on other bands, you will get an INFO 232 error.

Use the information in the newer manual - the older manual has information 
*only* applicable to K2s that have not been upgraded.

73,
Don W3FPR


On 4/19/2018 10:18 PM, EricJ wrote:
I have K2 SN 567. I didn't really have a problem with it, but I bought it used 
in 2005, had W3FPR look at it then, and install latest mods to bring it up to 
date. Today, I thought it might be time to take a look at alignment, and 
freshen it up a bit.
When I did the "PLL Ref Osc Range Test" in Alignment Part II, the range was slightly less 
than 6 kHz. When I got to "VFO Linearization", 40 meters was fine without any INFO 
messages.
I was using the original Rev B manual (not related to RevB board) that came with it. 
Under Part III, Alignment and Test there is another "VFO Linearization (All 
Bands)". I did that and every band failed (INFO 232) except 40 meters. And of 
course, in the Rev B manual, there is no INFO 232 only 235. Anyway, I checked around Q19 
as the Troubleshooting suggested and found X1, but no X2. After reading the circuit 
operation, I was convinced somehow X2 got left out. Since it was supposed to be there to 
prevent the very short range problem I thought I was experiencing, I thought I had found 
the problem.
I emailed Elecraft to order X2, and got a nice note from Mike saying they would 
send one out no charge. That kind of service still amazes me. But I told him to 
hold off until I can hear from this group.
I checked my other K2 manual (I also have SN 6911), and, first, it does not 
have a procedure for VFO linearization on anything but 40 meters. In fact, it 
says INFO 232 probably occurred because I wasn't on 40m. And the parts lists 
says X2 is not used!
I went into this without having any actual problem or complaint. The old manual 
convinced me I did. The later Rev I manual says I might, but didn't know it. 
I'm supposed to have a PLL range of 9.8 to 15 kHz. I have 5.97 kHz.
So if that is a problem, the problem is associated with Q19 which is a very 
simple stage. X1 is probably the most likely cause. Any ideas?
Also, since two crystals were originally used to "de-Q one another to increase the 
tuning range", what was done to make two crystals unnecessary?
Thanks for any help,
Eric KE6US
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to donw...@embarqmail.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to c-haw...@illinois.edu


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] K2 INFO 232

2018-04-20 Thread Don Wilhelm

Chuck,

If you are referring to the X1/X2 situation rather then the CAL PLL 
band, even the rev B boards have silkscreen and holes for X2, but X2 is 
left open.  The BFOMDKT and the Thermistor mod replace X1 and remove X2.
The basic A to B mods do not, but those mod kits are a part of the 
overall A to B mods.


73,
Don W3FPR

On 4/20/2018 8:27 AM, hawley, charles j jr wrote:

So A to B upgrades but not necessarily the rev B board?

Chuck Jack
KE9UW

Sent from my iPhone, cjack


On Apr 19, 2018, at 11:32 PM, Don Wilhelm  wrote:

Erik,

Your K2 has the A to B updates, do NOT put X2 in!
For Firmware level 2.01 and above, CAL PLL is done only on 40 meters (for all 
bands).  If attempted on other bands, you will get an INFO 232 error.

Use the information in the newer manual - the older manual has information 
*only* applicable to K2s that have not been upgraded.

73,
Don W3FPR


On 4/19/2018 10:18 PM, EricJ wrote:
I have K2 SN 567. I didn't really have a problem with it, but I bought it used 
in 2005, had W3FPR look at it then, and install latest mods to bring it up to 
date. Today, I thought it might be time to take a look at alignment, and 
freshen it up a bit.
When I did the "PLL Ref Osc Range Test" in Alignment Part II, the range was slightly less 
than 6 kHz. When I got to "VFO Linearization", 40 meters was fine without any INFO 
messages.
I was using the original Rev B manual (not related to RevB board) that came with it. 
Under Part III, Alignment and Test there is another "VFO Linearization (All 
Bands)". I did that and every band failed (INFO 232) except 40 meters. And of 
course, in the Rev B manual, there is no INFO 232 only 235. Anyway, I checked around Q19 
as the Troubleshooting suggested and found X1, but no X2. After reading the circuit 
operation, I was convinced somehow X2 got left out. Since it was supposed to be there to 
prevent the very short range problem I thought I was experiencing, I thought I had found 
the problem.
I emailed Elecraft to order X2, and got a nice note from Mike saying they would 
send one out no charge. That kind of service still amazes me. But I told him to 
hold off until I can hear from this group.
I checked my other K2 manual (I also have SN 6911), and, first, it does not 
have a procedure for VFO linearization on anything but 40 meters. In fact, it 
says INFO 232 probably occurred because I wasn't on 40m. And the parts lists 
says X2 is not used!
I went into this without having any actual problem or complaint. The old manual 
convinced me I did. The later Rev I manual says I might, but didn't know it. 
I'm supposed to have a PLL range of 9.8 to 15 kHz. I have 5.97 kHz.
So if that is a problem, the problem is associated with Q19 which is a very 
simple stage. X1 is probably the most likely cause. Any ideas?
Also, since two crystals were originally used to "de-Q one another to increase the 
tuning range", what was done to make two crystals unnecessary?
Thanks for any help,
Eric KE6US
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to donw...@embarqmail.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to c-haw...@illinois.edu


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] K2 INFO 232

2018-04-20 Thread hawley, charles j jr

So A to B upgrades but not necessarily the rev B board?

Chuck Jack 
KE9UW

Sent from my iPhone, cjack 

> On Apr 19, 2018, at 11:32 PM, Don Wilhelm  wrote:
> 
> Erik,
> 
> Your K2 has the A to B updates, do NOT put X2 in!
> For Firmware level 2.01 and above, CAL PLL is done only on 40 meters (for all 
> bands).  If attempted on other bands, you will get an INFO 232 error.
> 
> Use the information in the newer manual - the older manual has information 
> *only* applicable to K2s that have not been upgraded.
> 
> 73,
> Don W3FPR
> 
>> On 4/19/2018 10:18 PM, EricJ wrote:
>> I have K2 SN 567. I didn't really have a problem with it, but I bought it 
>> used in 2005, had W3FPR look at it then, and install latest mods to bring it 
>> up to date. Today, I thought it might be time to take a look at alignment, 
>> and freshen it up a bit.
>> When I did the "PLL Ref Osc Range Test" in Alignment Part II, the range was 
>> slightly less than 6 kHz. When I got to "VFO Linearization", 40 meters was 
>> fine without any INFO messages.
>> I was using the original Rev B manual (not related to RevB board) that came 
>> with it. Under Part III, Alignment and Test there is another "VFO 
>> Linearization (All Bands)". I did that and every band failed (INFO 232) 
>> except 40 meters. And of course, in the Rev B manual, there is no INFO 232 
>> only 235. Anyway, I checked around Q19 as the Troubleshooting suggested and 
>> found X1, but no X2. After reading the circuit operation, I was convinced 
>> somehow X2 got left out. Since it was supposed to be there to prevent the 
>> very short range problem I thought I was experiencing, I thought I had found 
>> the problem.
>> I emailed Elecraft to order X2, and got a nice note from Mike saying they 
>> would send one out no charge. That kind of service still amazes me. But I 
>> told him to hold off until I can hear from this group.
>> I checked my other K2 manual (I also have SN 6911), and, first, it does not 
>> have a procedure for VFO linearization on anything but 40 meters. In fact, 
>> it says INFO 232 probably occurred because I wasn't on 40m. And the parts 
>> lists says X2 is not used!
>> I went into this without having any actual problem or complaint. The old 
>> manual convinced me I did. The later Rev I manual says I might, but didn't 
>> know it. I'm supposed to have a PLL range of 9.8 to 15 kHz. I have 5.97 kHz.
>> So if that is a problem, the problem is associated with Q19 which is a very 
>> simple stage. X1 is probably the most likely cause. Any ideas?
>> Also, since two crystals were originally used to "de-Q one another to 
>> increase the tuning range", what was done to make two crystals unnecessary?
>> Thanks for any help,
>> Eric KE6US
>> __
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to donw...@embarqmail.com
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to c-haw...@illinois.edu
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2 INFO 232

2018-04-19 Thread Don Wilhelm

Erik,

Your K2 has the A to B updates, do NOT put X2 in!
For Firmware level 2.01 and above, CAL PLL is done only on 40 meters 
(for all bands).  If attempted on other bands, you will get an INFO 232 
error.


Use the information in the newer manual - the older manual has 
information *only* applicable to K2s that have not been upgraded.


73,
Don W3FPR

On 4/19/2018 10:18 PM, EricJ wrote:
I have K2 SN 567. I didn't really have a problem with it, but I bought 
it used in 2005, had W3FPR look at it then, and install latest mods to 
bring it up to date. Today, I thought it might be time to take a look at 
alignment, and freshen it up a bit.


When I did the "PLL Ref Osc Range Test" in Alignment Part II, the range 
was slightly less than 6 kHz. When I got to "VFO Linearization", 40 
meters was fine without any INFO messages.


I was using the original Rev B manual (not related to RevB board) that 
came with it. Under Part III, Alignment and Test there is another "VFO 
Linearization (All Bands)". I did that and every band failed (INFO 232) 
except 40 meters. And of course, in the Rev B manual, there is no INFO 
232 only 235. Anyway, I checked around Q19 as the Troubleshooting 
suggested and found X1, but no X2. After reading the circuit operation, 
I was convinced somehow X2 got left out. Since it was supposed to be 
there to prevent the very short range problem I thought I was 
experiencing, I thought I had found the problem.


I emailed Elecraft to order X2, and got a nice note from Mike saying 
they would send one out no charge. That kind of service still amazes me. 
But I told him to hold off until I can hear from this group.


I checked my other K2 manual (I also have SN 6911), and, first, it does 
not have a procedure for VFO linearization on anything but 40 meters. In 
fact, it says INFO 232 probably occurred because I wasn't on 40m. And 
the parts lists says X2 is not used!


I went into this without having any actual problem or complaint. The old 
manual convinced me I did. The later Rev I manual says I might, but 
didn't know it. I'm supposed to have a PLL range of 9.8 to 15 kHz. I 
have 5.97 kHz.


So if that is a problem, the problem is associated with Q19 which is a 
very simple stage. X1 is probably the most likely cause. Any ideas?


Also, since two crystals were originally used to "de-Q one another to 
increase the tuning range", what was done to make two crystals unnecessary?


Thanks for any help,
Eric KE6US


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to donw...@embarqmail.com


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] K2 INFO 232

2018-04-19 Thread EricJ
I have K2 SN 567. I didn't really have a problem with it, but I bought 
it used in 2005, had W3FPR look at it then, and install latest mods to 
bring it up to date. Today, I thought it might be time to take a look at 
alignment, and freshen it up a bit.


When I did the "PLL Ref Osc Range Test" in Alignment Part II, the range 
was slightly less than 6 kHz. When I got to "VFO Linearization", 40 
meters was fine without any INFO messages.


I was using the original Rev B manual (not related to RevB board) that 
came with it. Under Part III, Alignment and Test there is another "VFO 
Linearization (All Bands)". I did that and every band failed (INFO 232) 
except 40 meters. And of course, in the Rev B manual, there is no INFO 
232 only 235. Anyway, I checked around Q19 as the Troubleshooting 
suggested and found X1, but no X2. After reading the circuit operation, 
I was convinced somehow X2 got left out. Since it was supposed to be 
there to prevent the very short range problem I thought I was 
experiencing, I thought I had found the problem.


I emailed Elecraft to order X2, and got a nice note from Mike saying 
they would send one out no charge. That kind of service still amazes me. 
But I told him to hold off until I can hear from this group.


I checked my other K2 manual (I also have SN 6911), and, first, it does 
not have a procedure for VFO linearization on anything but 40 meters. In 
fact, it says INFO 232 probably occurred because I wasn't on 40m. And 
the parts lists says X2 is not used!


I went into this without having any actual problem or complaint. The old 
manual convinced me I did. The later Rev I manual says I might, but 
didn't know it. I'm supposed to have a PLL range of 9.8 to 15 kHz. I 
have 5.97 kHz.


So if that is a problem, the problem is associated with Q19 which is a 
very simple stage. X1 is probably the most likely cause. Any ideas?


Also, since two crystals were originally used to "de-Q one another to 
increase the tuning range", what was done to make two crystals unnecessary?


Thanks for any help,
Eric KE6US


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2 INFO 232 error with PLL

2015-06-29 Thread Dick Lamb
Don, I changed the setting to "Y," and it instantly jumped back on
frequency and everything is fine again.  As always, I really appreciate
your expert and responsive help.

Dick, K0KK

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Don Wilhelm  wrote:

> Dick,
>
> With the K60XV installed, do your have the menu for d10 set to "Y" - i
> needs to be that way or CAL PLL will fail as you stated.
> The initial frequency for CAL PLL is in the 12,960 to 12.990 range.
>
> Your TP1 reading also says that the frequency the K2 is trying to tune to
> is near 6350 kHz - again the problem is the d19 menu parameter.
>
> 73,
> Don W3FPR
>
>
> On 6/29/2015 11:46 AM, Dick Lamb wrote:
>
>> On a K2, the freq display is way, way off; e.g.,  on 40 meters it's really
>> receiving about 0.5 mHz lower.  I tried to run CAL PLL but get INFO 232.
>> The  PLL process appears to start, momentarily displaying 11,27164 mHZ,
>> then aborts in about a second with the INFO 232 error.  I'm absolutely
>> positive before running PLL that the VFO shows a 40 meter freq and the
>> probe is plugged into TP1.
>>
>> The CAL FCTR readings for the TPs are:  TP1 = 11271.8(4);  TP2 = 4913.55;
>>   TP3 = 12097.9(6)  (Numbers in parentheses flicker between an adjacent
>> digit, but values are otherwise stable).
>>
>> Probably not relevant, but more background.   This is my friends K2 for
>> which the KPA100 would not work.  I traced problem to blown diode in swr
>> bridge, fixed it, and that problem was solved.  Also, I Initially I made a
>> change in the set-up menu for the k60xv, not realizing it was installed.
>> Nothing else was touched--at least intentionally.
>>
>>
>>
>
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2 INFO 232 error with PLL

2015-06-29 Thread Don Wilhelm

Dick,

With the K60XV installed, do your have the menu for d10 set to "Y" - i 
needs to be that way or CAL PLL will fail as you stated.

The initial frequency for CAL PLL is in the 12,960 to 12.990 range.

Your TP1 reading also says that the frequency the K2 is trying to tune 
to is near 6350 kHz - again the problem is the d19 menu parameter.


73,
Don W3FPR

On 6/29/2015 11:46 AM, Dick Lamb wrote:

On a K2, the freq display is way, way off; e.g.,  on 40 meters it's really
receiving about 0.5 mHz lower.  I tried to run CAL PLL but get INFO 232.
The  PLL process appears to start, momentarily displaying 11,27164 mHZ,
then aborts in about a second with the INFO 232 error.  I'm absolutely
positive before running PLL that the VFO shows a 40 meter freq and the
probe is plugged into TP1.

The CAL FCTR readings for the TPs are:  TP1 = 11271.8(4);  TP2 = 4913.55;
  TP3 = 12097.9(6)  (Numbers in parentheses flicker between an adjacent
digit, but values are otherwise stable).

Probably not relevant, but more background.   This is my friends K2 for
which the KPA100 would not work.  I traced problem to blown diode in swr
bridge, fixed it, and that problem was solved.  Also, I Initially I made a
change in the set-up menu for the k60xv, not realizing it was installed.
Nothing else was touched--at least intentionally.




__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] K2 INFO 232 error with PLL

2015-06-29 Thread Dick Lamb
On a K2, the freq display is way, way off; e.g.,  on 40 meters it's really
receiving about 0.5 mHz lower.  I tried to run CAL PLL but get INFO 232.
The  PLL process appears to start, momentarily displaying 11,27164 mHZ,
then aborts in about a second with the INFO 232 error.  I'm absolutely
positive before running PLL that the VFO shows a 40 meter freq and the
probe is plugged into TP1.

The CAL FCTR readings for the TPs are:  TP1 = 11271.8(4);  TP2 = 4913.55;
 TP3 = 12097.9(6)  (Numbers in parentheses flicker between an adjacent
digit, but values are otherwise stable).

Probably not relevant, but more background.   This is my friends K2 for
which the KPA100 would not work.  I traced problem to blown diode in swr
bridge, fixed it, and that problem was solved.  Also, I Initially I made a
change in the set-up menu for the k60xv, not realizing it was installed.
Nothing else was touched--at least intentionally.

Ideas where I can start?  I do have my own working K2 for comparison
purposes.  Dick, K0KK
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] K2 - Info 232

2011-11-07 Thread Peder Haugaard-Pedersen
I found out what caused the 232-problem.
The RIT had moved to one end (+1) instead of being at 0-position.
Now the CAL PLL works.


73 de SM0GNS
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K2 - Info 232

2011-11-07 Thread Peder Haugaard-Pedersen
Hello there

Name here is Peder, SM0GNS.

I have now started building my K2 (s/n 7234) but have run into some 
problems. I am in the process of doing the PLL calibration but I receive 
the INFO 232 when having the VFO at 7.000. I need to put the VFO at 7.1 
MHz before I can start the CAL PLL without the 232-error, but the 
frequency does not change as it should do. According to the manual, the 
VCO fq should decrease through a range of 10-13 kHz. Even after about 30 
minutes nothing have happend.

When measuring at TP1 with my scope, I get 2.3V p-p and the fq is 
11913.0 kHz at 7.0 MHz.

I have checked all components around the VCO and the three relays, and 
all seems to be OK.


Anybody have any clue on how to proceed?


Best regards
Peder, SM0GNS
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K2 Info 232 error

2011-08-06 Thread Don Wilhelm
Jason,

During CAL PLL, Error 232 means that the firmware is not properly 
reading the frequency.  Aside from the obvious solutions of not being on 
40 meters, and forgetting to connect the counter probe to TP1,  It could 
be an indication that the counter probe is not working properly, or not 
enough RF voltage is getting to the firmware IC to reliably count the 
frequency.

Put the probe in TP1, tune to 40 meters, and enter the menu for CAL 
FCTR.  Does the frequency indicated equal approximately 4913 kHz plus 
whatever frequency is displayed on the K2 dial?  If it does, then the 
counter probe is responding correctly.  If you instead receive a varying 
frequency, or all zeros, the counter probe is not working properly.

If you do not get a proper reading at TP1, then put the counter probe 
into TP2 - you should read the BFO frequency which should be somewhere 
between 4912 and 4916 kHz (depends on mode and filter selection).

73,
Don W3FPR

On 8/6/2011 8:34 PM, Jason Morgan wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>  Well I am to the point of VFO Linearization in my assembly of the K2.  
> When I attempt the steps I am getting an info 232 error.  I have checked to 
> insure that that I have the freq. probe attached to the correct point and 
> that I am on the correct frequency.  This is the first problem that I have 
> had during the alignment phase of the receiver.  What components should I be 
> looking for?  I have checked the solder joints and all seem to be ok.
>   
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
>
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K2 Info 232 error

2011-08-06 Thread Jason Morgan
Hello everyone,
    Well I am to the point of VFO Linearization in my assembly of the K2.  When 
I attempt the steps I am getting an info 232 error.  I have checked to insure 
that that I have the freq. probe attached to the correct point and that I am on 
the correct frequency.  This is the first problem that I have had during the 
alignment phase of the receiver.  What components should I be looking for?  I 
have checked the solder joints and all seem to be ok. 
 
Any help would be appreciated.
 
73
DE
K4SHP (proud to be a KNOW code ham)
K
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html