I can understand that and I would agree. I had a Ten Tec Argonaut V.
Compared to the K2, it sounded, for lack of a better description...thick and
muddy. I like the crystal filters much better than the DSP that was on the
Argonaut V and the K2 is much quieter than a couple of other rigs that I have.
This past weekend, I was able to hear a Norway station that was barely out of
the noise level on CW. I doubt that I could have heard it on the Century 22
or the Kenwood TS-530SP.
Gary, N7HTS
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 07:46:02 -0700 (PDT)
Lee Buller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I worked the 3B7C station last night on 40 meters with a dipole. I compare
the signals between the PROII and the K2/100. Same! But, I think the K2 was
easier on the ears...cleaner audio or something. Reminds me the the ICOM 765
which is the sweetest sounding radio I've ever used in my opinion.
Butthe signals were still the samebut sweeter on the K2 thant the
PRO-2
Lee - K0WA
In our day and age it seems that Common Sense is in short supply. If you
don't have any Common Sense - get some Common Sense and use it. If you can't
find any Common Sense, ask for help from somebody who has some Common Sense.
Is Common Sense divine?
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
