Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 AUTO vs MAN mode

2014-12-11 Thread Don Wilhelm

Chad,

This is a situation that is the result of the KAT500 useing a single 
detector for sampling the forward and reverse power.  In other words, 
both cannot be sampled at exactly the same time.


If the forward power is sampled when the power is low and then the 
reverse power is sampled when the power is high the computed SWR will be 
a higher value than actual.
This can occur with the syllabic power change in SSB, but it is also 
possible to occur with high speed CW.


The firmware developer has been working to shorten the sampling 
interval, but so far he has made improvement, but it may not be possible 
to completely eliminate the difference without hardware changes to allow 
simultaneous sampling.


The solution is to run the KAT500 in MAN instead of AUTO once you have 
'trained' the tuner to any particular antenna.


73,
Don W3FPR

On 12/10/2014 11:58 PM, Chad WE9V wrote:

So I got my new KAT500 yesterday, and got it all trained to each of the
segments, without reading a single reflector post on the subject (pat own
back).  Start operating and finding that it wants to tune again in the
middle of a QSO (CW or SSB).  (Even when the bypass SWR is 1.5)  I wrote up
a big post to my local club to ask for help there first, when someone says
that's common operation.  Need to run in MAN mode, not AUTO.

Came here to the reflector archives (I'm not a regular reader) to see lots
of suggestions to run in MAN mode.



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 AUTO vs MAN mode

2014-12-11 Thread Chad WE9V
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com wrote:

 The firmware developer has been working to shorten the sampling interval,
 but so far he has made improvement


I can't make a single QSO (CW or SSB) in AUTO mode without it wanting a
re-tune and taking the KPA500 off-line.  I guess I would have been really
disappointed before the improvements were made.  The solution is a
work-around, not a solution.  No where in the manual does it say that for
proper operation, the tuner must be left in MAN mode.

Very disappointing.

Chad WE9V
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 AUTO vs MAN mode

2014-12-11 Thread Bob

Hi Chad,

  Well Don gave the correct reason, as he always does.   The 
nomenclature of auto and
manual refers only to the initiation of the tune cycle.  Man is in fact 
automatic after training.
Maybe a better term would semiautomatic.  It in manual will not initiate a tune 
cycle but will

automatically use stored values for where you are in the band, after training.

   I do not know what is written up in the latest manuals.  My KAT 
was from the 1st
batch (SN 39)  and I have old manuals.   However when the new software for the K 
line was
introduced Wayne did a write up on it.  If you do not have it I can send it to 
you as a PDF.

Manual is where you should be and is stated as such.

73,
Bob
K2TK   ex KN2TKR (1956)  K2TKR


On 12/11/2014 9:45 AM, Chad WE9V wrote:

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com wrote:


The firmware developer has been working to shorten the sampling interval,
but so far he has made improvement


I can't make a single QSO (CW or SSB) in AUTO mode without it wanting a
re-tune and taking the KPA500 off-line.  I guess I would have been really
disappointed before the improvements were made.  The solution is a
work-around, not a solution.  No where in the manual does it say that for
proper operation, the tuner must be left in MAN mode.

Very disappointing.

Chad WE9V
__



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 AUTO vs MAN mode

2014-12-11 Thread Jim Brown

On Wed,12/10/2014 8:58 PM, Chad WE9V wrote:

Came here to the reflector archives (I'm not a regular reader) to see lots
of suggestions to run in MAN mode.


That's exactly right, Chad. Train it as you did, then run it in MAN 
mode. As it senses your frequency, it will call up your trained settings.


The only thing you need to do now is retrain it for the frequencies 
where it has autotuned.


73, Jim K9YC
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] KAT500 AUTO vs MAN mode

2014-12-10 Thread Chad WE9V
So I got my new KAT500 yesterday, and got it all trained to each of the
segments, without reading a single reflector post on the subject (pat own
back).  Start operating and finding that it wants to tune again in the
middle of a QSO (CW or SSB).  (Even when the bypass SWR is 1.5)  I wrote up
a big post to my local club to ask for help there first, when someone says
that's common operation.  Need to run in MAN mode, not AUTO.

Came here to the reflector archives (I'm not a regular reader) to see lots
of suggestions to run in MAN mode.

To me, this sounds like a band-aid workaround.  Why do users (and Elecraft)
think that running in MAN mode is the acceptable mode of operation?  I'd
like to suggest that this is a bug that is in need of firmware
improvement.  If I start a QSO with fine SWR, even on an antenna with less
than 1.8:1 SWR, at no point during the QSO should I be in need of a retune,
have the KPA500 go into keying bypass mode, and be left with 30 watts out
or less due to it trying to tune on every dit and dah.

Can this please be fixed so the KAT500 can be left in AUTO mode and only
initiate a retune when the SWR is truly above the retune threshold?

Respectfully,
Chad WE9V
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com