[Elecraft] Sub RX and P3

2014-04-04 Thread ANDY NEHAN
Just got the Sub RX and I must say it looks tasty. However, I am puzzled by the 
display on the P3 (another tasty toy I would not be without). I have read the 
KE7X tour de force on the Elecraft kit and the P3 manual and the other Elecraft 
manuals and unless I am going soggy in the brain department (golly I do hope 
not - I still have so much to do) my P3 display puzzles me.

The sub RX shows up in magenta (I seem to recall KE7X calls it cyan but trust 
me its magenta) on the P3 but when, and only when, I put the K3 into SPLIT mode 
the magenta bar on the P3 (which shows what the Sub RX is doing) has a central 
highlighted portion which is really bright. When I move out of SPLIT its a 
standard magenta. 

I accept that this is a really usefull way of telling me I am in SPLIT mode but 
I cant find a reference to it anywhere - so please put me out of my misery, 
where is this reflected in the documentation?

Andy G4HUE
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sub RX and P3

2014-04-04 Thread Bob
The second receiver IF really isn't showing up on the P3, you are only
seeing the IF from the main receiver.  However you do get to see some very
nice visual effects on top of that IF display.  VFO-B will show up in
magenta and will be the approximate width of the IF filter selected.  If
you have SUB-rx enabled, then it is controlled by VFO b, and its filter
width will establish the width of the magenta display.  While It is colored
magenta, it will turn red if you have SPLIT on (because you are going to
transmit on that VFO B setting).

Heaven help you if you are working DX in split and don't see red -- the UP
Police will be on you in a blink of an eye!

73, Bob, WB4SON



On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:25 PM, ANDY NEHAN andy.ne...@btinternet.comwrote:

 Just got the Sub RX and I must say it looks tasty. However, I am puzzled
 by the display on the P3 (another tasty toy I would not be without). I have
 read the KE7X tour de force on the Elecraft kit and the P3 manual and the
 other Elecraft manuals and unless I am going soggy in the brain department
 (golly I do hope not - I still have so much to do) my P3 display puzzles me.

 The sub RX shows up in magenta (I seem to recall KE7X calls it cyan but
 trust me its magenta) on the P3 but when, and only when, I put the K3 into
 SPLIT mode the magenta bar on the P3 (which shows what the Sub RX is doing)
 has a central highlighted portion which is really bright. When I move out
 of SPLIT its a standard magenta.

 I accept that this is a really usefull way of telling me I am in SPLIT
 mode but I cant find a reference to it anywhere - so please put me out of
 my misery, where is this reflected in the documentation?

 Andy G4HUE
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 Message delivered to wb4...@gmail.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sub RX and P3

2014-04-04 Thread Stan Gibbs, KR7C
Ed,
You are confusing markers and cursors.  The VFO A receive frequency is
denoted by a green cursor and VFO B by a red cursor (when SPLIT is
active).

The markers, MKRA (green) and MKRB (magenta), are used with the Select
button to QSY the K3, but they do not necessarily indicate the active
frequency of their respective VFO except when that button is pressed.  Page
16 of the Rev D manual has the full details.

If you put the rig into SPLIT mode, you can see all 4 indicators at once on
the P3 screen if you want.




-
73, Stan - KR7C
--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Sub-RX-and-P3-tp7586555p7586558.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sub RX and P3

2014-04-04 Thread Mike K2MK
Hi Andy,

First it's easier to see what's going on if you turn off the A and B
markers. You just want to see the cursors to get a better handle on how they
operate. And you want to activate the VFO-B cursor in the P3 menu.

VFO-A has a green cursor. VFO-B has a Magenta cursor. There is no separate
cursor for the SUB RX. It is just the VFO-B cursor. If you choose SPLIT
there is an additional cursor in Red. The Red cursor denotes your transmit
frequency when it differs from VFO-A. You'll also see the Red cursor if you
choose XIT. The Red cursor may be the same width as the magenta cursor so it
might be invisible when operating SPLIT. If you fiddle with the bandwidth
knob after pushing BSET you'll be able see the difference between the Red
and Magenta Cursors.

73,
Mike K2MK


G4HUE wrote
 Just got the Sub RX and I must say it looks tasty. However, I am puzzled
 by the display on the P3 (another tasty toy I would not be without). I
 have read the KE7X tour de force on the Elecraft kit and the P3 manual and
 the other Elecraft manuals and unless I am going soggy in the brain
 department (golly I do hope not - I still have so much to do) my P3
 display puzzles me.
 
 The sub RX shows up in magenta (I seem to recall KE7X calls it cyan but
 trust me its magenta) on the P3 but when, and only when, I put the K3 into
 SPLIT mode the magenta bar on the P3 (which shows what the Sub RX is
 doing) has a central highlighted portion which is really bright. When I
 move out of SPLIT its a standard magenta. 
 
 I accept that this is a really usefull way of telling me I am in SPLIT
 mode but I cant find a reference to it anywhere - so please put me out of
 my misery, where is this reflected in the documentation?
 
 Andy G4HUE





--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Sub-RX-and-P3-tp7586555p7586568.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sub RX and P3

2014-04-04 Thread Gary Smith
Boy if that ain't the truth. I still keep messing up with that.

Gary, KA1J

 Heaven help you if you are working DX in split and don't see red -- the UP
 Police will be on you in a blink of an eye!
 
 73, Bob, WB4SON


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] Sub-rx or P3?

2010-09-01 Thread John Harper
Just curious about opinions of CW DXers/contesters here on the list
regarding these two options - which is likely to make the most impact on
effectiveness?

Both is not currently an option  ;-)

John Harper AE5X
http://www.ae5x.com/blog

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Sub-rx or P3?

2010-09-01 Thread John K3TN

I'd say the sub-rx by a long shot. For DXing, the ability to listen to *both*
the DX station working split *and* his pileup at the same time is a biggie.
For contesting, SO2V operation listen around the same band when CQing during
slow times is an enhancement. Just seeing the blips is not as effective as
hearing the calls.

John K3TN
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Sub-rx-or-P3-tp5486303p5486543.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Sub-rx or P3?

2010-09-01 Thread Craig D. Smith
I've obtained both relatively recently, and my vote would be for the P3.

The P3 is quite useful for seeing the calling freq of stations in DX
pileups, so in that regard it satisfies one of the functions of the sub-RX.


Unless you really need to use diversity or to monitor the audio on another
frequency or band, the sub RX has limited additional utility.  It is pricy
($700 to $1000+ depending on your choice of filters) and adds considerably
to the internal complexity of the K3, making service access more difficult.
But it does work well and increases the flexibility of the K3.

The P3 is eye-opening.  At a glance you can see everything happening on the
band segment of your choice without touching a tuning dial.  I've found lots
of DX with it already before it appeared on the clusters.  The display is
excellent - very clear and sharp.  The functionality of the P3 will get even
better as the expected hardware and firmware upgrades become available.

73   Craig   AC0DS

 


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Sub-rx or P3?

2010-09-01 Thread Barry

I agree the sub-Rx by a long shot.  The way to get in and out of a pileup
quickly is by following who the DX is working and figuring out the pattern
of a split operation.

I had a spectrum display in my 7800, and while it's pretty to look at, it's
really just fluff.

Barry W2UP ( DXCC TOTHR FWIW :.)  )
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Sub-rx-or-P3-tp5486303p5486960.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] Sub-rx or P3?

2010-09-01 Thread Jack Smith
  There are low cost alternatives to the P3, such as (cheapest) an 8 MHz 
Softrock Lite II board or the more expensive but better integrated 
LP-PAN, so that it is possible to discover how useful a panadapter is 
without a major financial commitment.

If a panadapter turns out to be useful, you can then later decide 
whether to add the P3 or stay with the lower cost solution.

You can also use the Softrock or LP-Pan as a sub-receiver, but it's not 
nearly as well integrated as the K3's internal sub-receiver.

Jack K8ZOA



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Sub-rx or P3?

2010-09-01 Thread Jim Cox
There is no comparison between the 7800 and the display of the P3 or that 
produced by LP Pan.   With the later 2, you have so much detail they are of 
use, rather than just telling if the band is open.

It depends on what kind of radio operation your undertaking.  If you a very 
serious Dxer or Contester, I agree the sub receiver is the way to go.  If 
you only a casual DXer or Contester, I would pick the P3, softrock or LP 
Pan.

Jim K4JAF


- Original Message - 
From: Barry w...@comcast.net
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Sub-rx or P3?



 I agree the sub-Rx by a long shot.  The way to get in and out of a pileup
 quickly is by following who the DX is working and figuring out the pattern
 of a split operation.

 I had a spectrum display in my 7800, and while it's pretty to look at, 
 it's
 really just fluff.

 Barry W2UP ( DXCC TOTHR FWIW :.)  )
 -- 
 View this message in context: 
 http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Sub-rx-or-P3-tp5486303p5486960.html
 Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Sub-rx or P3?

2010-09-01 Thread Vic K2VCO
For DX, the subrx is a huge plus. It is a tremendous help to listen to a split 
pileup in 
one ear and the DX in the other. Yes, you can switch back and forth quickly 
without the 
subrx, but at least for me the subrx method is much, much better. It is the 
difference 
between getting the DX in a couple of calls and struggling for half an hour.

I have both. While the P3 also has some good uses for DX, like the ability to 
find that 
one weak signal on a nearly dead band, the subrx is definitely higher priority.

For contesting, I find the P3 more useful. I don't use the subrx, and the P3 is 
good for 
finding a clear spot to call CQ and to give you a general picture of where the 
activity is 
on a band.

Everyone's style is different, but that's how I use these tools.

On 9/1/2010 3:30 AM, John Harper wrote:
 Just curious about opinions of CW DXers/contesters here on the list
 regarding these two options - which is likely to make the most impact on
 effectiveness?

 Both is not currently an option  ;-)

 John Harper AE5X
 http://www.ae5x.com/blog


-- 
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Sub-rx or P3?

2010-09-01 Thread george fritkin
I use my K3 in a diversity mode paired with an ORION ll.  My K3 is a single 
receiver with no P3.  You talk about flexibility and performance, as far as I 
am concerned this is it.  Two great receivers, and a third OK receiver, band 
scope, two transmitters so I can taylor the audio, and the ability to select 
three different linear amplifiers.  A little pricey but great flexibility.
George, W6GF




--- On Wed, 9/1/10, Vic K2VCO v...@rakefet.com wrote:

From: Vic K2VCO v...@rakefet.com
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Sub-rx or P3?
To: 
Date: Wednesday, September 1, 2010, 8:28 AM

For DX, the subrx is a huge plus. It is a tremendous help to listen to a split 
pileup in 
one ear and the DX in the other. Yes, you can switch back and forth quickly 
without the 
subrx, but at least for me the subrx method is much, much better. It is the 
difference 
between getting the DX in a couple of calls and struggling for half an hour.

I have both. While the P3 also has some good uses for DX, like the ability to 
find that 
one weak signal on a nearly dead band, the subrx is definitely higher priority.

For contesting, I find the P3 more useful. I don't use the subrx, and the P3 is 
good for 
finding a clear spot to call CQ and to give you a general picture of where the 
activity is 
on a band.

Everyone's style is different, but that's how I use these tools.

On 9/1/2010 3:30 AM, John Harper wrote:
 Just curious about opinions of CW DXers/contesters here on the list
 regarding these two options - which is likely to make the most impact on
 effectiveness?

 Both is not currently an option  ;-)

 John Harper AE5X
 http://www.ae5x.com/blog


-- 
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



  
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] Sub-rx or P3?

2010-09-01 Thread Lu Romero
Make my vote for the KRX3.

After living for years with a TS850 and literally wearing
the label off of the TF-SET button, having the second
receiver is wonderful.  Being able to listen to the DX on
his frequency in one ear and the pileup on the TX frequency
in the other, and being able to adjust the level of the two
individually or with the balance control is a valuable
tool for timing calls... Us little pistols with 500w and a
tribander at 40 feet rely on call timing.  If I had bigger
antennas, a taller tower and legal limit output, maybe the
P3 would be a wash with the KRX3, but here at Whiskey Four
Little Tower, the second receiver wins hands down.  

The second advantage of the KRX3 is diversity receive.  I
often put my main receiver on my tribander and the second
receiver on a vertical.  Diversity helps manage quite a lot
of fade, especially those deep Asiatic Russia CW signals
that travel through the Auroral Circle, always a problem
here in Florida with a high angle of incidence antenna like
I have at 40 feet.  You can hear which polarization is
winning by listening to where the signal ends up in the
stereo image (tribander on the left, vertical on the right,
the winning polarization is the strongest in your head). 
Some may not like this effect (I do!).

The third is being able to search for multipliers in a
contest environment on the second receiver between calling
CQ on the main.  This helped me do a Sweeep in SS SSB for
the first time in 32 years of entering the contest (I dont
use the cluster for SS).  Its kind of like SO 1.5 R!  You
can actually listen on two different bands if you use the
AUX RF input on the KRX3 and have separate antennas.

In deference to those visual people, especially all my
Icom owning friends, I find working split stations with my
club's IC7700 (no second receiver, but with a pan display)
and Pro 2's (hard to use Dual Watch feature) primitive
compared with using my K3 with the KRX3 on the same antennas
at the club.  The IC7700 is like going back to the TS-850,
with me madly punching the XFC button.  At least Icom was
smart and didnt print the label on the button! Its much
easier on a 7800 with its second receiver, but then you can
buy two K3's and two P3's for the price of one of those (If
you have a sturdy enough table to put it on and have two
people to help you lift it out of the shipping crate as Icom
recommends in the manual!!!) .

There is no substitute, in my opinion, for actually HEARING
the pileup.

However, a P3 is on my Christmas List  :)

Lu Romero - W4LT
Tampa FL
K3 # 3192

---


Message: 35
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 04:30:06 -0600
From: John Harper j...@ae5x.com
Subject: [Elecraft] Sub-rx or P3?
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Message-ID:
f4adc05ae667228e679ced50fa05fb1a.squir...@http://www.ae5x.com
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1

Just curious about opinions of CW DXers/contesters here on
the list
regarding these two options - which is likely to make the
most impact on
effectiveness?

Both is not currently an option  ;-)

John Harper AE5X
http://www.ae5x.com/blog




__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Sub-rx or P3?

2010-09-01 Thread John Harper
Us little pistols with 500w and a
tribander at 40 feet rely on call timing. 

Lu, if you're a little pistol with that set-up, I'm a Daisy Red Ryder!

Thanks for the helpful info from all who replied. A strong case for the 2nd 
receiver...what I suspected anyway as it seems to offer both the 2-VFO 
monitoring in addition to diversity capability.

Thanks again,

John AE5X
http://www.ae5x.com/blog

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Sub-rx or P3?

2010-09-01 Thread Fred Atchley
Us little pistols with 500w and a

tribander at 40 feet rely on call timing. 

 

Lu, if you're a little pistol with that set-up, I'm a Daisy Red Ryder!

 

Thanks for the helpful info from all who replied. A strong case for the 2nd
receiver...what I suspected anyway as it seems to offer both the 2-VFO
monitoring in addition to diversity capability.

 

Thanks again,

 

John AE5X

 

. and I'm a Lilliputian.

73, Fred, AE6IC, K3 2241(1RX), P3 100

 

 Do or Do-not. There is no 'Try'... ~ Yoda

 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html