Interesting indeed. The comparison they quote is the IMD dynamic range at 5 KHz spacing, which the R&S wins. But take a look at the 2 KHz spacing - the K3 trounces the R&S.
73, john WA1ABI K3 #795 > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Klewer > Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2008 11:43 AM > To: 'Elecraft' > Subject: [Elecraft] K3 vs. Rohde and Schwartz > > > Interesting to note that in QST magazine's review of a super whizbang, > thermonuclear commercial transceiver from Rohde and Schwartz in the > October issue of QST, the receiver they referenced its intermod > performance to is.......the K3. > > NICE! > > John, N6AX > K3 567 > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com > _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
