Re: [Elecraft] The K3 in comparison to the Big Guns

2008-05-17 Thread W7TEA

What held me back from completing my K3 order was the small  
front panel.  I played with one in Aptos and decided that while I'd much
prefer 
a larger panel with more space between the knobs, the K3 would work.  
I've most recently owned an Orion, an Omni VI+ and an Omni VII.  
I tend to like big. Hope the K3 arrives next month. 

Gary W7TEA


IC-7800 height or even a tad more. I'm not a fan of making radios as small 
as possible.

Simon Brown, HB9DRV


-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/The-K3-in-comprison-to-the-Big-Guns-tp17267266p17297786.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] The K3 in comparison to the Big Guns [OT]

2008-05-16 Thread Simon Brown (HB9DRV)
IMO one area where the IC-7700 and co. win out is in ergonomics, especially 
for those of us who are members of the Terminally Bewildered club (tired 
eyes, colour blindness). Given the extra real estate this may seem like a 
daft comparison, but the FTDX-9000's tuning knob(s) and the IC-7700 / 
IC-7800 display are excellent. Having said that the K3's use of the 
available panel space is outstanding!


Is an IC-7700 worth the price of 2 x K3? Quite possibly, the first two 
shipments are sold out, from the Yahoo! list users are delighted.


Now back to the programming...

Simon Brown, HB9DRV

--
From: Jan Erik Holm [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Money isnĀ“t the answer to everything!!! This I did learn
many many moons ago.



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] The K3 in comparison to the Big Guns [OT]

2008-05-16 Thread Geoffrey Downs
Simon, they might have been even more delighted with a K3! (We shall never 
know.)


If  being sold out is a measure of satisfaction, I shouldn think the K3's 
order backlog would put it at the top of the list :-)


73 to all

Geoff
G3UCK

- Original Message - 


From: Simon Brown (HB9DRV) [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Is an IC-7700 worth the price of 2 x K3? Quite possibly, the first two
shipments are sold out, from the Yahoo! list users are delighted.


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] The K3 in comparison to the Big Guns

2008-05-16 Thread Simon Brown (HB9DRV)
IC-7800 height or even a tad more. I'm not a fan of making radios as small 
as possible.


Simon Brown, HB9DRV

--
From: David Ferrington, M0XDF [EMAIL PROTECTED]


How many units high?




On 16 May 2008, at 09:43, Simon Brown (HB9DRV) wrote:


I would willingly pay a lot for a K3 in a 19 case.



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] The K3 in comparison to the Big Guns

2008-05-16 Thread G4ILO


Simon Brown (HB9DRV) wrote:
 
 IC-7800 height or even a tad more. I'm not a fan of making radios as small 
 as possible.
Perhaps not, but a lot of people don't have the luxury of large rooms to
operate in. With the box room I have to use, I wouldn't have the space for
an IC-7400 even if I could afford one (or manage to carry it up the stairs
without hospitalizing myself with a back injury!) The K3 is just about
perfect for my situation.

-
Julian, G4ILO  K3 s/n: 222 K2 s/n: 392
G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com
Zerobeat Ham Forums: www.zerobeat.net/smf
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/The-K3-in-comprison-to-the-Big-Guns-tp17267266p17274024.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] The K3 in comparison to the Big Guns

2008-05-16 Thread Joe Stofko
Hi Dave, 

Right you are!  Actually, Shane's thinking
is a bit flawed. He equates performance with product
price and weight.  And, neither should be part
of the criteria. We have, sadly, become the victims
of marketing. We are slammed with it every day.
The product that costs more, MUST (somehow) be better
than it's cheaper competition !  As Elecraft proves.
that's not always true !  

73, 

Joe - W1AIU



From: Dave KQ3T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 9:36 AM
To: Joe Stofko
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] The K3 in comprison to the Big Guns

Or, to make an analogy more along the lines of manufactured products...

What has better performance? A 10-ton Mack truck or a 1500-lb F1 Ferrari?

That said, there are ergonomic considerations that may be compromised in the
smaller design (as they are in the Ferrari).

73,
Dave KQ3T



Joe Stofko wrote: 
Please...please excuse me for being overly simplistic.. but, I just cannot 
help myself !  :)Shane, your questions and bewilderment are certainly
understandable... but, think of it this way...

a 1-inch solid cube of lead might cost a few dollars...
a 1-inch hollow cube of gold might cost several hundred dollars...
The gold sure does look nice... but which one would you
rather have as a paper weight ?

73,

Joe - W1AIU

Shane White wrote:
  
That's it, I'm going to ask the silly question.

How can the K3's receiver outperform that of the Icom IC-7800 and Yaesu
FTDX9000? These two radios cost in excess of $11,000 and weigh in at over
25Kg (55lbs)! The K3 costs about $2000 and weighs about 4Kg (8.5lbs). Yes
the K3 is deficient of a screen, internal PSU and some knobs but why on
earth is there such a difference in price and weight? Given this, how can
the K3's receiver outperform these other radios?

These questions keep bugging me. Those glossy Yaesu and Icom brochures
certainly don't help!
  


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] The K3 in comparison to the Big Guns

2008-05-16 Thread Shane White

I think that's an unreasonable statement Joe. Please have another read of my
initial post. I didn't make any such assumption, I merely questioned the
relative cost and performance of some radios. 
No 73's for you.

Shane.


Joe Stofko-2 wrote:
 
 Hi Dave, 
 
   Right you are!  Actually, Shane's thinking
 is a bit flawed. He equates performance with product
 price and weight.  
 Joe - W1AIU
 
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/The-K3-in-comprison-to-the-Big-Guns-tp17267266p17275630.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] The K3 in comparison to the Big Guns

2008-05-16 Thread Nelson Moyer
I've been following the 'big gun' thread with interest. I'm astonished that
this group seems to imply that 'big gun' status depends upon the radio you
own, rather than the amplifiers and antennas you use. Most rigs today put
out between 100-200 watts, regardless of price. DX'ing and contesting
success seems to me to be related to your amplifier and your antennas, not
your radio. The radio only comes into play on the low bands, where being
able to hear the weak ones through the noise becomes important.

All this begs the question, Who is a 'big gun'? Is it someone with a 5
figure radio, someone who breaks all the pile-ups with one call, someone who
wins all of the contests, someone who is on top of the Honor Roll and has
5BWAZ, or someone who has 160 acres of antenna farm with full wavelength
beverages every 22.5 degrees? Maybe it's all of the above, but I doubt it.

I'm a little pistol by most definitions, but I'm #1 Honor Roll, have 2507
band-entities toward the Challenge, and hold the WPX Award of Excellence
endorsed for 160, 30, 17, 12, and digital modes. I lack 8 entities on 160
for 9BDXCC, lack 6 zones for 5BWAZ. I've been DX'ing since 1981, and I use
an FT-100 (FT-707 before that), 600 watts of amplifier power, a TH-11 at 48
ft. (since 1996, a HF6V before that), a side mounted 5 element yagi on 6
meters, and a HF2V with 30 meter coil. I have a flag, mag loop, and low 80
meter dipole to help me hear better on 160. My entire antenna farm is
crammed into a back yard in town that measures 60x70 ft.

So why did I order a K3? Because I can't hear the DX very well on 80 and
160, and I'm betting that the K3 will enable me to improve my low band
Challenge score and finish 5BWAZ from my sub-optimal location. Besides, I'm
retiring, and it's time for my dream radio.

Maybe 'big gun' is more about what you do than what you have, but I'm really
looking forward to my K3.

Nelson, KU0A

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] The K3 in comparison to the Big Guns

2008-05-16 Thread David Ferrington, M0XDF
same here, I was going for the FT-2000 before the K3 announcement -  
that changed a lot of things, including having the space to put it on  
my desk

--
If you must play, decide on three things at the start: the rules of the
game, the stakes, and the quitting time. -Chinese Proverb

On 16 May 2008, at 13:54, G4ILO wrote:

Perhaps not, but a lot of people don't have the luxury of large  
rooms to
operate in. With the box room I have to use, I wouldn't have the  
space for
an IC-7400 even if I could afford one (or manage to carry it up the  
stairs

without hospitalizing myself with a back injury!) The K3 is just about
perfect for my situation.


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: Re: [Elecraft] The K3 in comparison to the Big Guns

2008-05-16 Thread Art

Bill
You got me. I never read your reference, going strictly by the 
advertisements. I don't own a 7800, likely never will, so its actual vs 
advertised performance, and that of all the other recent offshore boxes, 
shall remain a mystery. Also if I recall back then ARRL made 5KHz close 
in measurements giving manufacturers the opportunity to design for and 
look good in 5KHz spacing reviews. Meanwhile Sherwood et al were 
measuring down to 2KHz and below which made the design compromises (read 
faults to us low band dxers) painfully obvious, backing up what we 
were hearing - or not - on the air.


73 Art

Message: 51
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 12:26:48 -0400
From: Bill Tippett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Elecraft] The K3 in comparison to the Big Guns


K6XT wrote:

 I note that the 7800 first appeared with something like a
6KHz first IF filter, got hammered in the press, eham etc. for lousy
close-in performance, and quickly added a 3KHz 1st IF filter option.

 Bzzzt...you forgot Icom's advertising formula!
Their 6 kHz filter is actually 11+ kHz and their 3 kHz
is actually 5+ kHz (per Sherwood's measurements below).

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Elecraft_K3/message/http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ic7800/message/3532http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ic7800/message/3532

Question:  When can an 11+ kHz BW filter be called a 6 kHz filter?
Answer:  When Icom says so in their advertising.  wink-wink

Caveat emptor!

73, Bill W4ZV
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com