Re: [Elecraft] DXCC, Remoting and Moving Around

2019-03-24 Thread Jim N7US
Before 1977, DXCC Rule 9 stated that all contacts had to be made from within
the same call area or within a 175-mile radius if the call area changed.

In 1970, I moved from IA to IL (330 miles) and had to start over, which
seemed unreasonable to me.  I moved to AZ in 1972 and was happy that I could
pick up from where I left off when I was a college student in IA when the
rule changed in 1977. 

Jim N7US

-Original Message-


Before being cut off by Eric, I want to point out that there was a 50 mile
radius for DXCC also prior to the early or mid-80s. I can't remember when
the ARRL changed it.
The ARRL decided to remove the rule and change to contacts had to be made
from the same DXCC entity. This was done according to the ARRL because of
the changing demographics as people were more mobile than when the DXCC
rules were formed. People were moving more frequently due to job and family
requirements.
Now we have a proposal to go back to a 50 mile radius. I don't think that
will happen. Though there may be a need to change it to something other than
the same DXCC entity. As, to me, it seems to be a bit unfair as DXCC
entities vary greatly in size.

Mark, WB9CIF


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] DXCC, Remoting and Moving Around

2019-03-24 Thread Mark Musick
Before being cut off by Eric, I want to point out that there was a 50 mile 
radius for DXCC also prior to the early or mid-80s. I can't remember when the 
ARRL changed it.
The ARRL decided to remove the rule and change to contacts had to be made from 
the same DXCC entity. This was done according to the ARRL because of the 
changing demographics as people were more mobile than when the DXCC rules were 
formed. People were moving more frequently due to job and family requirements.
Now we have a proposal to go back to a 50 mile radius. I don't think that will 
happen. Though there may be a need to change it to something other than the 
same DXCC entity. As, to me, it seems to be a bit unfair as DXCC entities vary 
greatly in size.

Mark, WB9CIF

-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net  On 
Behalf Of ab2tc
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2019 16:44
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] DXCC, Remoting and Moving Around

Hi,

The following snippet is from a recent posting by Ted, KN1CBR:

"So what should the rules be?  The WAS rule, I believe, says within a 50 mile 
radius.  I am one QSL short of 5BWAS because NE on 10 from my side of the 
Continental Divide in CO has eluded me for more than a decade.  I could drive 
to the CO/NE state line with a KX3 in the car but that would be a rule
violation, so I haven't.   Should there be a radius limit for DXCC as well?"

Adopting the 50 mile radius for DXCC as well as WAS seems a very reasonable 
idea. It seems to be manageable for WAS so why wouldn't it be for DXCC, too.
I wasn't aware of the 50 mile radius for WAS. I have multiband WAS all done 
from one location.

AB2TC - Knut





--
Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] DXCC, Remoting and Moving Around

2019-03-24 Thread ab2tc
Hi,

The following snippet is from a recent posting by Ted, KN1CBR:

"So what should the rules be?  The WAS rule, I believe, says within a 50
mile radius.  I am one QSL short of 5BWAS because NE on 10 from my side of
the Continental Divide in CO has eluded me for more than a decade.  I could
drive to the CO/NE state line with a KX3 in the car but that would be a rule
violation, so I haven't.   Should there be a radius limit for DXCC as well?"

Adopting the 50 mile radius for DXCC as well as WAS seems a very reasonable
idea. It seems to be manageable for WAS so why wouldn't it be for DXCC, too.
I wasn't aware of the 50 mile radius for WAS. I have multiband WAS all done
from one location.

AB2TC - Knut





--
Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html