Re: [elinks-dev] [PATCH] configure.in: add a missing AC_LANG_PROGRAM macro

2013-09-18 Thread Witold Filipczyk 
W dniu 18.09.2013 o 12:48 Kamil Dudka  pisze:

> On Monday 25 February 2013 15:45:32 Kamil Dudka wrote:
>> ... around the first argument of AC_COMPILE_IFELSE in order to eliminate
>> warnings with autoconf 2.68.
>> ---
>>  configure.in |4 ++--
>>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in
>> index 023af06..9d992ee 100644
>> --- a/configure.in
>> +++ b/configure.in
>> @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ AC_STRUCT_TM
>>  AC_C_CONST
>>  AC_C_INLINE
>>  AC_MSG_CHECKING([[for C99-conforming inline]])
>> -AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([[
>> +AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([[
>>  int add(int change);
>>
>>  static int sum;
>> @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([[
>>  sub(int change)
>>  {
>>  return add(-change);
>> -}]],
>> +}]])],
>>  [AC_MSG_RESULT([[yes]])
>>   AC_DEFINE([NONSTATIC_INLINE], [inline],
>>  [Define as inline if the compiler lets you declare a function 
>> without
>>  inline, then define it with inline, and have that definition refer to
>>  identifiers with internal linkage.  This is allowed by C99 6.7.4p6 and
>>  6.7.4p3 together.  Otherwise define as nothing.])],
>
> The above patch still applies.  Any chance to get this in?  Thanks in  
> advance!

Added to the master branch. Thanks!
___
elinks-dev mailing list
elinks-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-dev

Re: [elinks-dev] [PATCH] configure.in: add a missing AC_LANG_PROGRAM macro

2013-09-18 Thread Kamil Dudka 
On Monday 25 February 2013 15:45:32 Kamil Dudka wrote:
> ... around the first argument of AC_COMPILE_IFELSE in order to eliminate
> warnings with autoconf 2.68.
> ---
>  configure.in |4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in
> index 023af06..9d992ee 100644
> --- a/configure.in
> +++ b/configure.in
> @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ AC_STRUCT_TM
>  AC_C_CONST
>  AC_C_INLINE
>  AC_MSG_CHECKING([[for C99-conforming inline]])
> -AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([[
> +AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([[
>   int add(int change);
> 
>   static int sum;
> @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([[
>   sub(int change)
>   {
>   return add(-change);
> - }]],
> + }]])],
>   [AC_MSG_RESULT([[yes]])
>AC_DEFINE([NONSTATIC_INLINE], [inline],
>   [Define as inline if the compiler lets you declare a function 
> without
>  inline, then define it with inline, and have that definition refer to
>  identifiers with internal linkage.  This is allowed by C99 6.7.4p6 and
>  6.7.4p3 together.  Otherwise define as nothing.])],

The above patch still applies.  Any chance to get this in?  Thanks in advance!

Kamil
___
elinks-dev mailing list
elinks-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-dev