Re: [elinks-dev] [PATCH] configure.in: add a missing AC_LANG_PROGRAM macro
On Monday 25 February 2013 15:45:32 Kamil Dudka wrote: ... around the first argument of AC_COMPILE_IFELSE in order to eliminate warnings with autoconf 2.68. --- configure.in |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in index 023af06..9d992ee 100644 --- a/configure.in +++ b/configure.in @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ AC_STRUCT_TM AC_C_CONST AC_C_INLINE AC_MSG_CHECKING([[for C99-conforming inline]]) -AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([[ +AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([[ int add(int change); static int sum; @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([[ sub(int change) { return add(-change); - }]], + }]])], [AC_MSG_RESULT([[yes]]) AC_DEFINE([NONSTATIC_INLINE], [inline], [Define as inline if the compiler lets you declare a function without inline, then define it with inline, and have that definition refer to identifiers with internal linkage. This is allowed by C99 6.7.4p6 and 6.7.4p3 together. Otherwise define as nothing.])], The above patch still applies. Any chance to get this in? Thanks in advance! Kamil ___ elinks-dev mailing list elinks-dev@linuxfromscratch.org http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-dev
Re: [elinks-dev] [PATCH] configure.in: add a missing AC_LANG_PROGRAM macro
W dniu 18.09.2013 o 12:48 Kamil Dudka kdu...@redhat.com pisze: On Monday 25 February 2013 15:45:32 Kamil Dudka wrote: ... around the first argument of AC_COMPILE_IFELSE in order to eliminate warnings with autoconf 2.68. --- configure.in |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in index 023af06..9d992ee 100644 --- a/configure.in +++ b/configure.in @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ AC_STRUCT_TM AC_C_CONST AC_C_INLINE AC_MSG_CHECKING([[for C99-conforming inline]]) -AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([[ +AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([[ int add(int change); static int sum; @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([[ sub(int change) { return add(-change); -}]], +}]])], [AC_MSG_RESULT([[yes]]) AC_DEFINE([NONSTATIC_INLINE], [inline], [Define as inline if the compiler lets you declare a function without inline, then define it with inline, and have that definition refer to identifiers with internal linkage. This is allowed by C99 6.7.4p6 and 6.7.4p3 together. Otherwise define as nothing.])], The above patch still applies. Any chance to get this in? Thanks in advance! Added to the master branch. Thanks! ___ elinks-dev mailing list elinks-dev@linuxfromscratch.org http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-dev
[elinks-dev] [PATCH] configure.in: add a missing AC_LANG_PROGRAM macro
... around the first argument of AC_COMPILE_IFELSE in order to eliminate warnings with autoconf 2.68. --- configure.in |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in index 023af06..9d992ee 100644 --- a/configure.in +++ b/configure.in @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ AC_STRUCT_TM AC_C_CONST AC_C_INLINE AC_MSG_CHECKING([[for C99-conforming inline]]) -AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([[ +AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([[ int add(int change); static int sum; @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([[ sub(int change) { return add(-change); - }]], + }]])], [AC_MSG_RESULT([[yes]]) AC_DEFINE([NONSTATIC_INLINE], [inline], [Define as inline if the compiler lets you declare a function without inline, then define it with inline, and have that definition refer to identifiers with internal linkage. This is allowed by C99 6.7.4p6 and 6.7.4p3 together. Otherwise define as nothing.])], -- 1.7.1 ___ elinks-dev mailing list elinks-dev@linuxfromscratch.org http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-dev