Re: [elrepo] Empty include/linux/version.h

2012-12-31 Thread Alan Bartlett
On 30 December 2012 20:06, Mihai T. Lazarescu mtl...@gmail.com wrote:
 I noticed that the comilation of VirtualBox drivers failed
 due to an empty

 include/linux/version.h

 in the 3.7.x series.  In 3.6.9 it has the normal contents.
 This is the diff that fills it:

 diff -rupN 3.7.1-1.el6.elrepo.i686-original/include/linux/version.h 
 3.7.1-1.el6.elrepo.i686/include/linux/version.h
 --- 3.7.1-1.el6.elrepo.i686-original/include/linux/version.h2012-12-19 
 00:54:56.0 +0200
 +++ 3.7.1-1.el6.elrepo.i686/include/linux/version.h 2012-12-30 
 14:03:09.810016093 +0200
 @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
 +#define LINUX_VERSION_CODE 198401
 +#define KERNEL_VERSION(a,b,c) (((a)  16) + ((b)  8) + (c))

 but I'm not sure whether this is a configuration/compilation
 issue or upstream.

 Either way, with this VistualBox 4.2.6 compiles and runs fine
 on CentOS 6.3 with kernel 3.7.1.

Hi Mihai,

Thank you for the report. I can confirm that the packaged
include/linux/version.h is indeed empty. :-(

Would you please open a bug report
(http://elrepo.org/bugs/main_page.php) for this problem and I will
then take it from there.

Regards,
Alan.
___
elrepo mailing list
elrepo@lists.elrepo.org
http://lists.elrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/elrepo


Re: [elrepo] Empty include/linux/version.h

2012-12-31 Thread Mihai T. Lazarescu
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:47:12PM +, Alan Bartlett wrote:

 On 30 December 2012 20:06, Mihai T. Lazarescu mtl...@gmail.com wrote:
  I noticed that the comilation of VirtualBox drivers failed
  due to an empty
 
  include/linux/version.h
 
  in the 3.7.x series.  In 3.6.9 it has the normal contents.
  This is the diff that fills it:
 
  diff -rupN 3.7.1-1.el6.elrepo.i686-original/include/linux/version.h 
  3.7.1-1.el6.elrepo.i686/include/linux/version.h
  --- 3.7.1-1.el6.elrepo.i686-original/include/linux/version.h2012-12-19 
  00:54:56.0 +0200
  +++ 3.7.1-1.el6.elrepo.i686/include/linux/version.h 2012-12-30 
  14:03:09.810016093 +0200
  @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
  +#define LINUX_VERSION_CODE 198401
  +#define KERNEL_VERSION(a,b,c) (((a)  16) + ((b)  8) + (c))
 
  but I'm not sure whether this is a configuration/compilation
  issue or upstream.
 
  Either way, with this VistualBox 4.2.6 compiles and runs fine
  on CentOS 6.3 with kernel 3.7.1.
 
 Hi Mihai,
 
 Thank you for the report. I can confirm that the packaged
 include/linux/version.h is indeed empty. :-(
 
 Would you please open a bug report
 (http://elrepo.org/bugs/main_page.php) for this problem and I will
 then take it from there.

Hi Alan,

Thanks for the check.  It's all yours now:

http://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=340

Best wishes for the new year!
Mihai
___
elrepo mailing list
elrepo@lists.elrepo.org
http://lists.elrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/elrepo


Re: [elrepo] Empty include/linux/version.h

2012-12-31 Thread Alan Bartlett
On 31 December 2012 13:51, Mihai T. Lazarescu mtl...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:47:12PM +, Alan Bartlett wrote:

 Hi Mihai,

 Thank you for the report. I can confirm that the packaged
 include/linux/version.h is indeed empty. :-(

 Would you please open a bug report
 (http://elrepo.org/bugs/main_page.php) for this problem and I will
 then take it from there.

 Hi Alan,

 Thanks for the check.  It's all yours now:

 http://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=340

 Best wishes for the new year!
 Mihai

I've now got it. It looks as if I need to make a minor change to the
specification file.

Alan.
___
elrepo mailing list
elrepo@lists.elrepo.org
http://lists.elrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/elrepo


Re: [elrepo] Empty include/linux/version.h

2012-12-31 Thread Mihai T. Lazarescu
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 02:19:34PM +, Alan Bartlett wrote:

 On 31 December 2012 13:51, Mihai T. Lazarescu mtl...@gmail.com wrote:
  On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:47:12PM +, Alan Bartlett wrote:
 
  Thank you for the report. I can confirm that the packaged
  include/linux/version.h is indeed empty. :-(
 
  Would you please open a bug report
  (http://elrepo.org/bugs/main_page.php) for this problem and I will
  then take it from there.
 
  Thanks for the check.  It's all yours now:
 
  http://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=340
 
 I've now got it. It looks as if I need to make a minor change to the
 specification file.

Excellent!  The 3.7 series is the first that enables the
control of screen brightness for a HP laptop here. :-)

Mihai
___
elrepo mailing list
elrepo@lists.elrepo.org
http://lists.elrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/elrepo


[elrepo] Announcement: EL6 Updated kernel-ml Release [Version 3.7.1-2.el6.elrepo]

2012-12-31 Thread Alan Bartlett
Announcing the release of the kernel-ml-3.7.1-2.el6.elrepo packages
into the EL6 elrepo-kernel repository:

http://elrepo.org/tiki/kernel-ml

This release fixes an issue that resulted in an empty
include/linux/version.h file being packaged.
[http://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=340]

The following files are currently syncing to the mirrors:

x86
kernel-ml-3.7.1-2.el6.elrepo.i686.rpm
kernel-ml-devel-3.7.1-2.el6.elrepo.i686.rpm
kernel-ml-doc-3.7.1-2.el6.elrepo.noarch.rpm
kernel-ml-firmware-3.7.1-2.el6.elrepo.noarch.rpm
kernel-ml-headers-3.7.1-2.el6.elrepo.i386.rpm
kernel-ml-NONPAE-3.7.1-2.el6.elrepo.i686.rpm
kernel-ml-NONPAE-devel-3.7.1-2.el6.elrepo.i686.rpm
perf-3.7.1-2.el6.elrepo.i686.rpm

x86_64
kernel-ml-3.7.1-2.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm
kernel-ml-devel-3.7.1-2.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm
kernel-ml-doc-3.7.1-2.el6.elrepo.noarch.rpm
kernel-ml-firmware-3.7.1-2.el6.elrepo.noarch.rpm
kernel-ml-headers-3.7.1-2.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm
perf-3.7.1-2.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm

src
kernel-ml-3.7.1-2.el6.elrepo.nosrc.rpm

We provide these kernels for hardware testing in an effort to identify
new/updated drivers which can then be targeted for backporting as kmod
packages. Meanwhile, these kernels may provide interim relief to
people with non-functional hardware. We stress that we consider such
kernels as a last resort for those who are unable to get their
hardware working using the RHEL-6 kernel with supplementary kmod
packages.

These packages are provided As-Is with no implied warranty or
support. Using the kernel-ml may expose your system to security,
performance and/or data corruption issues. Since timely updates may
not be available from the ELRepo Project, the end user has the
ultimate responsibility for deciding whether to continue using the
kernel-ml packages in regular service.

The packages are intentionally named kernel-ml so as not to conflict
with the RHEL-6 kernels and, as such, they may be installed and
updated alongside the regular kernel. The kernel configuration is
based upon a default RHEL-6 configuration with added functionality
enabled as appropriate.

If a bug is found when using these kernels, the end user is encouraged
to report it upstream to the Linux Kernel Bug Tracker [1] and, for our
reference, to the ELRepo bug tracker [2]. By taking such action, the
reporter will be assisting the kernel developers, Red Hat and the Open
Source Community as a whole.

Thank you,

The ELRepo Team.

[1] http://bugzilla.kernel.org/
[2] http://elrepo.org/bugs/
___
elrepo mailing list
elrepo@lists.elrepo.org
http://lists.elrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/elrepo


Re: [elrepo] Empty include/linux/version.h

2012-12-31 Thread Alan Bartlett
On 31 December 2012 18:04, Mihai T. Lazarescu mtl...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 02:19:34PM +, Alan Bartlett wrote:

 I've now got it. It looks as if I need to make a minor change to the
 specification file.

 Excellent!  The 3.7 series is the first that enables the
 control of screen brightness for a HP laptop here. :-)

I have now released a kernel-ml-3.7.1-2.el6.elrepo package set and the
files are currently syncing to the mirrors.

All being well, this minor 'mishap' should now be resolved. ;-)

Alan.
___
elrepo mailing list
elrepo@lists.elrepo.org
http://lists.elrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/elrepo