Re: [elrepo] Empty include/linux/version.h

2013-01-01 Thread Mihai T. Lazarescu
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 06:41:55PM +, Alan Bartlett wrote:

> On 31 December 2012 18:04, Mihai T. Lazarescu  wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 02:19:34PM +, Alan Bartlett wrote:
> >>
> >> I've now got it. It looks as if I need to make a minor change to the
> >> specification file.
> >
> > Excellent!  The 3.7 series is the first that enables the
> > control of screen brightness for a HP laptop here. :-)
> 
> I have now released a kernel-ml-3.7.1-2.el6.elrepo package set and the
> files are currently syncing to the mirrors.
> 
> All being well, this minor 'mishap' should now be resolved. ;-)

All set, works fine.  Thanks!

Mihai
___
elrepo mailing list
elrepo@lists.elrepo.org
http://lists.elrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/elrepo


Re: [elrepo] Empty include/linux/version.h

2012-12-31 Thread Alan Bartlett
On 31 December 2012 18:04, Mihai T. Lazarescu  wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 02:19:34PM +, Alan Bartlett wrote:
>>
>> I've now got it. It looks as if I need to make a minor change to the
>> specification file.
>
> Excellent!  The 3.7 series is the first that enables the
> control of screen brightness for a HP laptop here. :-)

I have now released a kernel-ml-3.7.1-2.el6.elrepo package set and the
files are currently syncing to the mirrors.

All being well, this minor 'mishap' should now be resolved. ;-)

Alan.
___
elrepo mailing list
elrepo@lists.elrepo.org
http://lists.elrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/elrepo


Re: [elrepo] Empty include/linux/version.h

2012-12-31 Thread Mihai T. Lazarescu
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 02:19:34PM +, Alan Bartlett wrote:

> On 31 December 2012 13:51, Mihai T. Lazarescu  wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:47:12PM +, Alan Bartlett wrote:
> >
> >> Thank you for the report. I can confirm that the packaged
> >> include/linux/version.h is indeed empty. :-(
> >>
> >> Would you please open a bug report
> >> (http://elrepo.org/bugs/main_page.php) for this problem and I will
> >> then take it from there.
> >
> > Thanks for the check.  It's all yours now:
> >
> > http://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=340
> 
> I've now got it. It looks as if I need to make a minor change to the
> specification file.

Excellent!  The 3.7 series is the first that enables the
control of screen brightness for a HP laptop here. :-)

Mihai
___
elrepo mailing list
elrepo@lists.elrepo.org
http://lists.elrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/elrepo


Re: [elrepo] Empty include/linux/version.h

2012-12-31 Thread Alan Bartlett
On 31 December 2012 13:51, Mihai T. Lazarescu  wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:47:12PM +, Alan Bartlett wrote:
>
>> Hi Mihai,
>>
>> Thank you for the report. I can confirm that the packaged
>> include/linux/version.h is indeed empty. :-(
>>
>> Would you please open a bug report
>> (http://elrepo.org/bugs/main_page.php) for this problem and I will
>> then take it from there.
>
> Hi Alan,
>
> Thanks for the check.  It's all yours now:
>
> http://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=340
>
> Best wishes for the new year!
> Mihai

I've now got it. It looks as if I need to make a minor change to the
specification file.

Alan.
___
elrepo mailing list
elrepo@lists.elrepo.org
http://lists.elrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/elrepo


Re: [elrepo] Empty include/linux/version.h

2012-12-31 Thread Mihai T. Lazarescu
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:47:12PM +, Alan Bartlett wrote:

> On 30 December 2012 20:06, Mihai T. Lazarescu  wrote:
> > I noticed that the comilation of VirtualBox drivers failed
> > due to an empty
> >
> > include/linux/version.h
> >
> > in the 3.7.x series.  In 3.6.9 it has the normal contents.
> > This is the diff that fills it:
> >
> > diff -rupN 3.7.1-1.el6.elrepo.i686-original/include/linux/version.h 
> > 3.7.1-1.el6.elrepo.i686/include/linux/version.h
> > --- 3.7.1-1.el6.elrepo.i686-original/include/linux/version.h2012-12-19 
> > 00:54:56.0 +0200
> > +++ 3.7.1-1.el6.elrepo.i686/include/linux/version.h 2012-12-30 
> > 14:03:09.810016093 +0200
> > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> > +#define LINUX_VERSION_CODE 198401
> > +#define KERNEL_VERSION(a,b,c) (((a) << 16) + ((b) << 8) + (c))
> >
> > but I'm not sure whether this is a configuration/compilation
> > issue or upstream.
> >
> > Either way, with this VistualBox 4.2.6 compiles and runs fine
> > on CentOS 6.3 with kernel 3.7.1.
> 
> Hi Mihai,
> 
> Thank you for the report. I can confirm that the packaged
> include/linux/version.h is indeed empty. :-(
> 
> Would you please open a bug report
> (http://elrepo.org/bugs/main_page.php) for this problem and I will
> then take it from there.

Hi Alan,

Thanks for the check.  It's all yours now:

http://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=340

Best wishes for the new year!
Mihai
___
elrepo mailing list
elrepo@lists.elrepo.org
http://lists.elrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/elrepo


Re: [elrepo] Empty include/linux/version.h

2012-12-31 Thread Alan Bartlett
On 30 December 2012 20:06, Mihai T. Lazarescu  wrote:
> I noticed that the comilation of VirtualBox drivers failed
> due to an empty
>
> include/linux/version.h
>
> in the 3.7.x series.  In 3.6.9 it has the normal contents.
> This is the diff that fills it:
>
> diff -rupN 3.7.1-1.el6.elrepo.i686-original/include/linux/version.h 
> 3.7.1-1.el6.elrepo.i686/include/linux/version.h
> --- 3.7.1-1.el6.elrepo.i686-original/include/linux/version.h2012-12-19 
> 00:54:56.0 +0200
> +++ 3.7.1-1.el6.elrepo.i686/include/linux/version.h 2012-12-30 
> 14:03:09.810016093 +0200
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +#define LINUX_VERSION_CODE 198401
> +#define KERNEL_VERSION(a,b,c) (((a) << 16) + ((b) << 8) + (c))
>
> but I'm not sure whether this is a configuration/compilation
> issue or upstream.
>
> Either way, with this VistualBox 4.2.6 compiles and runs fine
> on CentOS 6.3 with kernel 3.7.1.

Hi Mihai,

Thank you for the report. I can confirm that the packaged
include/linux/version.h is indeed empty. :-(

Would you please open a bug report
(http://elrepo.org/bugs/main_page.php) for this problem and I will
then take it from there.

Regards,
Alan.
___
elrepo mailing list
elrepo@lists.elrepo.org
http://lists.elrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/elrepo