[O] [PATCH] make revisions in export section

2018-08-24 Thread Will Pierce
Made some revisions in the manual section on exports.


0001-org-manual-make-revisions-in-export-section.patch
Description: Binary data


[O] [PATCH] org-manual: revise markup section intro

2018-08-24 Thread Will Pierce
This patch revises the markup section's introductory paragraph to read more
smoothly.

I'll be slowly working the manual!


0001-org-manual-revise-markup-section-intro.patch
Description: Binary data


[O] Run C-c C-c fixups everywhere in a file?

2018-08-24 Thread Robert Irelan
Hi,

The C-c C-C command does a variety of actions to improve the
consistency of an Org-mode file, such as updating timestamps,
realigning tables, etc. Has anyone created a command to run all of
these actions everywhere in a file where C-c C-c merely reformats or
fixes the file, as opposed to changing state (as it does on
checkboxes)? I'm envisioning something using the org-element API.

-- 
Robert Irelan
rire...@gmail.com



Re: [O] Problem jumping back & forth between foonote ref and def with 'C-c C-c'

2018-08-24 Thread Alain . Cochard


Hello, and thanks for the feed back.

Nicolas Goaziou writes on Tue 21 Aug 2018 20:13:

 > As strange as it may sound, I think both are correct. 
 > 
 > In 9.1, Org puts point at the location where you can start to edit the
 > definition right away. If you want to "jump back", you can use the Org
 > mark ring, or simply move backward -- a single character is enough but
 > you can also move to the beginning of the line -- and use `C-c C-c'
 > again.
 > 
 > In 8.2, point is at a location where `C-c C-c' operates right away, but
 > you still have to move forward to start editing the definition.
 > 
 > My gut feelings is the current behaviour is slightly better, but YWWV.
 > 
 > WDYT?

When I use `C-c C-c', it is almost always to check the content of the
footnote, not to edit it, so you'll understand I prefer the 8.2
behavior.

But even if it is for editing, I'd say it is statistically unlikely
that the editing starts right at the place where the 9.1 behavior puts
the point.  So you generally have to move anyway, so what's one
additional forward character?

In fact, with 9.1, would it be a problem to allow `C-c C-c' to
directly go back to the reference?

Alternatively, could not there be an org variable whose customization
would allow to choose one behavior or the other?

Finally, something I just noticed: with 9.1, after doing `C-c C-x f'
and before entering any character, doing `C-c C-c' repetitively does
jump back and forth between reference and definition.  This seems to
me a little bit inconsistent with the behavior observed after having
entered some characters.

Regards


-- 
EOST (École et Observatoire des Sciences de la Terre) 
IPG (Institut de Physique du Globe) | alain.coch...@unistra.fr
5 rue René Descartes   [bureau 106] | Phone: +33 (0)3 68 85 50 44 
F-67084 Strasbourg Cedex, France| Fax:   +33 (0)3 68 85 01 25 



Re: [O] coderef link should support external file path link.

2018-08-24 Thread numbch...@gmail.com
Maybe I forgot it. Could be another suggestion because I have not found it
in my recorded issues. (addded it now)
Hmm. Recently I don't have time to check it out. If I got time to do this,
I will update it here. It's not urgent, if you don't have time too, leave
it opened is fine.

[stardiviner] GPG key ID: 47C32433
IRC(freeenode): stardiviner Twitter:  @numbchild
Key fingerprint = 9BAA 92BC CDDD B9EF 3B36  CB99 B8C4 B8E5 47C3 2433
Blog: http://stardiviner.github.io/


On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 8:46 PM Nicolas Goaziou 
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> stardiviner  writes:
>
> > When I use ~org-store-link~ in an opened src block to create a coderef
> > link, then I ~org-insert-link-global~ in another Org file, but it only
> > has "~(use formdata to send url with params)~" in link source (without
> > file path). It should contains the source file path like following. (I
> > have to manually fix this long path to make it work correctly).
> >
> > #+begin_src org
> >
> [[file:~/Org/Wiki/Web%20Scraping.org::(use%20formdata%20to%20send%20url%20with%20params)][use
> formdata to send url with params]]
> > #+end_src
>
> You suggested the very same idea some time ago. I answered I was open to
> patches in this direction. Do you feel like implementing it?
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Nicolas Goaziou
>