Patch 699 (http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/699/) is now "Accepted".
Maintainer comment: none This relates to the following submission: http://mid.gmane.org/%3CAANLkTimwvM19SrZhMiebE390MZP6%3Dym497oVFz5a4RJ6%40mail.gmail.com%3E Here is the original message containing the patch: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Subject: [O] Tiny docstring fix in org-footnote.el > Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 16:44:44 -0000 > From: Puneeth Chaganti <puncha...@gmail.com> > X-Patchwork-Id: 699 > Message-Id: <AANLkTimwvM19SrZhMiebE390MZP6=ym497ovfz5a4...@mail.gmail.com> > To: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org> > > Hi, > > A tiny docstring fix in org-footnote.el > > > diff --git a/lisp/org-footnote.el b/lisp/org-footnote.el > index 9dbd6be..90147d2 100644 > --- a/lisp/org-footnote.el > +++ b/lisp/org-footnote.el > @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ If yes, return the beginning position, the label, and the > definition, if local." > (defun org-footnote-at-definition-p () > "Is the cursor at a footnote definition. > This matches only pure definitions like [1] or [fn:name] at the beginning > -of a line. It does not a references like [fn:name:definition], where the > +of a line. It does not match references like [fn:name:definition], where the > footnote text is included and defined locally. > The return value will be nil if not at a footnote definition, and a list > with start and label of the footnote if there is a definition at point." >