Re: [O] Bug in emphasis fontification

2017-12-04 Thread Kaushal Modi 
On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 5:30 PM Nicolas Goaziou 
wrote:

> Hopefully fixed. Thank you.
>

Yes, I confirm the fix. Thank you!
-- 

Kaushal Modi

Re: [O] Bug in emphasis fontification

2017-12-02 Thread Nicolas Goaziou 
Hello,

Kaushal Modi  writes:

> I believe that the recent fontification rules still need tweaking.
>
> Here's a MWE:
>
> =
> *bold*
> =
>
> Here's a more detailed version:
>
> =
> *bold*
> ^ above does not work
> *bold* this works at the time of typing.
> But on saving and doing =revert-buffer=, the fontification goes away.
> This *bold* fontification stays (starting emph char *and* ending emph char
> not at BOL/EOL).
>
> Looks like fontification is lost if emphasis chars are at BOL or EOL.

Hopefully fixed. Thank you.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou

[O] Bug in emphasis fontification

2017-12-01 Thread Kaushal Modi 
Hello,

I believe that the recent fontification rules still need tweaking.

Here's a MWE:

=
*bold*
=

Here's a more detailed version:

=
*bold*
^ above does not work
*bold* this works at the time of typing.
But on saving and doing =revert-buffer=, the fontification goes away.
This *bold* fontification stays (starting emph char *and* ending emph char
not at BOL/EOL).

Looks like fontification is lost if emphasis chars are at BOL or EOL.
=

It looks like this (attached).. notice that the *bold* fontification works
only when the emph chars are neither at BOL nor at EOL. The same issue is
with all emphasis variants: italics, code, verbatim.

-- 

Kaushal Modi