Re: [O] Can't use char in TODO state
Hi Nicolas and Bastien, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: Bastien b...@altern.org writes: Michael Brand michael.ch.br...@gmail.com writes: It works with this patch http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/964 from Nicolas which I am still using to test it. If so, then Nicolas please apply it. It really simplifies the way headlines are matched in many places in the code. I've applied it. This works as expected from my point of view. Thanks a lot... ... with this exception (when using TODO states from Dan Davison): #+OPTIONS: ^:nil #+SEQ_TODO: DOESN'T_WORK DOESN'T-WORK | WORKS * WORKS Marche In HTML, class is WORKS and word in the heading is WORKS as well. * DOESN'T_WORK Marche pas The HTML class is DOESN'T_WORK (the real name of the state) and DOESN_T_WORK in the heading. In LaTeX, the status DOESN'T_WORK is kept as-is in the heading, hence provoking a layout bug in the PDF. This is true, whatever the value of the option ^ for interpreting sub- and super-scripts: setting it to =t= or to =nil= makes no difference. * DOESN'T-WORK Marche pas In this last case, the real name DOESN'T-WORK is conserved as HTML class, but translated to DOESN_T_WORK in the heading. No problem in LaTeX. Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban
Re: [O] Can't use char in TODO state
Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: Bastien b...@altern.org writes: Michael Brand michael.ch.br...@gmail.com writes: It works with this patch http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/964 from Nicolas which I am still using to test it. If so, then Nicolas please apply it. It really simplifies the way headlines are matched in many places in the code. I've applied it. This works as expected from my point of view. Thanks a lot... Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban
Re: [O] Can't use char in TODO state
Hello, Bastien b...@altern.org writes: Michael Brand michael.ch.br...@gmail.com writes: It works with this patch http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/964 from Nicolas which I am still using to test it. If so, then Nicolas please apply it. It really simplifies the way headlines are matched in many places in the code. I've applied it. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
Re: [O] Can't use char in TODO state
Jambunathan K kjambunat...@gmail.com writes: Note the regression in TOC with this commit. The HTML file was produced by C-C C-e b (by org-html.el) with emacs -Q. I think this should be fixed now. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
Re: [O] Can't use char in TODO state
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes: If so, then Nicolas please apply it. It really simplifies the way headlines are matched in many places in the code. I've applied it. Thanks a lot. -- Bastien
Re: [O] Can't use char in TODO state
Hi Sébastien, Sebastien Vauban wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com writes: I find this behavior not entirely satisfying, even if I can fully accept that is a forbidden character in the TODO states. For example, we could think of a warning being generated, or of the state being fully ignored, or ... I agree there is inconsistency here. Special chars are allowed in TODO keywords but they create the confusion you describe when used at the beg or the end of the keyword (NEW is safe AFAICT.) BTW, do you have an alternative for this NEW state, in 4 positions? ;-) NIOU? :) -- Bastien
Re: [O] Can't use char in TODO state
Hi, Michael Brand michael.ch.br...@gmail.com writes: It works with this patch http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/964 from Nicolas which I am still using to test it. Has anyone else been using this patch without problems? If so, then Nicolas please apply it. It really simplifies the way headlines are matched in many places in the code. Thanks, -- Bastien
[O] Can't use char in TODO state
#+SEQ_TODO: NEW TEST DONE CANX Hello, Instead of using the TODO state NEW, I tried using NEW so that it occupies 4 letters, as all my other states (better display in the agenda). Though... * TEST Do this Simply use S-right arrow to cycle through the different states, and you'll see NEW added many times: - DONE Do this - CANX Do this - Do this - NEW Do this which prooves that NEW is well somehow considered as a TODO state, being added automagically, but the next cycle steps don't succeed... - NEW NEW Do this - NEW NEW NEW Do this - ... I find this behavior not entirely satisfying, even if I can fully accept that is a forbidden character in the TODO states. For example, we could think of a warning being generated, or of the state being fully ignored, or ... BTW, do you have an alternative for this NEW state, in 4 positions? ;-) Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban
Re: [O] Can't use char in TODO state
Hi Sebastien On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:32, Sebastien Vauban Instead of using the TODO state NEW, I tried using NEW so that it occupies 4 letters, as all my other states (better display in the agenda). Though... * TEST Do this Simply use S-right arrow to cycle through the different states, and you'll see NEW added many times: - DONE Do this - CANX Do this - Do this - NEW Do this which prooves that NEW is well somehow considered as a TODO state, being added automagically, but the next cycle steps don't succeed... - NEW NEW Do this - NEW NEW NEW Do this - ... I find this behavior not entirely satisfying, even if I can fully accept that is a forbidden character in the TODO states. For example, we could think of a warning being generated, or of the state being fully ignored, or ... It works with this patch http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/964 from Nicolas which I am still using to test it. BTW, do you have an alternative for this NEW state, in 4 positions? ;-) What about NEVV ? (ok, it was a joke) Michael
