Re: [O] Problem with dates while generating HTML
Hi François, pin...@iro.umontreal.ca (François Pinard) writes: I added Du as a prefix to get going, but the ideal would be to directly use 2012-02-29 as the link description. Is there a way, or is it a limitation (or a bug)? I would call it a limitation. -- Bastien
Re: [O] Problem with dates while generating HTML
Bastien b...@gnu.org writes: Hi François, Bonjour, Bastien! I added Du as a prefix to get going, but the ideal would be to directly use 2012-02-29 as the link description. Is there a way, or is it a limitation (or a bug)? I would call it a limitation. Could it be documented somewhere appropriate? Along with Nick's suggestion of prefixing the date with a space to prevent the problem. François
Re: [O] Problem with dates while generating HTML
Bonjour François, pin...@iro.umontreal.ca (François Pinard) writes: Bastien b...@gnu.org writes: Hi François, Bonjour, Bastien! I added Du as a prefix to get going, but the ideal would be to directly use 2012-02-29 as the link description. Is there a way, or is it a limitation (or a bug)? I would call it a limitation. Could it be documented somewhere appropriate? Along with Nick's suggestion of prefixing the date with a space to prevent the problem. Yes, it could be documented in an appropriate place in Worg. Please suggest one and send a patch! Best, -- Bastien
[O] Problem with dates while generating HTML
Given the following header contents: --8---cut here---start-8--- * Problème date - [[file:2012-02-29.org::*Notes][2012-02-29]] - [[file:2012-02-29.org::*Notes][Du 2012-02-29]] --8---cut here---end---8--- here is how it is shown in the Web browser after publishing: attachment: Capture du 2012-03-05.png I added Du as a prefix to get going, but the ideal would be to directly use 2012-02-29 as the link description. Is there a way, or is it a limitation (or a bug)? François
Re: [O] Problem with dates while generating HTML
François Pinard pin...@iro.umontreal.ca wrote: Given the following header contents: * Problème date - [[file:2012-02-29.org::*Notes][2012-02-29]] - [[file:2012-02-29.org::*Notes][Du 2012-02-29]] here is how it is shown in the Web browser after publishing: I added Du as a prefix to get going, but the ideal would be to directly use 2012-02-29 as the link description. Is there a way, or is it a limitation (or a bug)? [2012-02-29] looks like an inactive date, as well as the description of a link. I presume the ambiguity causes this problem, so you somehow have to disambiguate it. Prefixing it with Du (or just about anything, including a space) is one way to do that. So a limitation certainly - a bug? Maybe, maybe not. Nick
