Re: [O] Removing the date in a subtree export using the new exporter

2012-11-13 Thread Bastien
Hi Alan,

Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes:

 With another question: should the patch be sent to the list,
 or just to you (or any other process)?

 Please send any patch to the list.

Yes -- please do so.  Not only this is useful so that anyone
can review/test/comment the patch, but patches sent on the list
are stored on the patchwork:

  http://patchwork.newartisans.com/project/org-mode/list/

This helps not forgetting those we cannot process immediately.

Thanks for your contribution!

-- 
 Bastien



Re: [O] Removing the date in a subtree export using the new exporter

2012-11-09 Thread Alan Schmitt
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes:

 Hello,

 Alan Schmitt alan.schm...@polytechnique.org writes:

 I'm using the new exporter to create a pdf (through latex) of a subtree
 of a huge file, and I want to remove some default information. I found
 out a way to do it, but I'm not sure it's the right way. Here it is.

 #+BEGIN_SRC org
 :PROPERTIES:
 :EXPORT_TITLE: Foo bar
 :EXPORT_OPTIONS: toc:nil author:nil
 :EXPORT_DATE: ~
 :END:
 #+END_SRC

 The part about which I'm not sure is how to remove the date. I tried
 putting nothing instead of the '~' but it does not work. Maybe there
 could be an option for it?

 Indeed, there could be a date:nil option. I'll add it later. Thanks
 for suggesting it.

I wanted to fix this and saw that you already did. However it seems that
LaTeX still adds a date when a \maketitle happens with no date
specified. This small patch should fix this.

diff --git a/contrib/lisp/org-e-latex.el b/contrib/lisp/org-e-latex.el
index 64908b9..9534a79 100644
--- a/contrib/lisp/org-e-latex.el
+++ b/contrib/lisp/org-e-latex.el
@@ -1026,9 +1026,10 @@ holding export options.
  (format \\author{%s\\thanks{%s}}\n author email))
 ((or author email) (format \\author{%s}\n (or author email)
  ;; Date.
- (when (plist-get info :with-date)
+ (if (plist-get info :with-date)
(let ((date (org-export-data (plist-get info :date) info)))
-(and date (format \\date{%s}\n date
+(and date (format \\date{%s}\n date)))
+   \\date{}\n)
  ;; Title
  (format \\title{%s}\n title)
  ;; Hyperref options.


(Please let me know if it's not the good format to send the patch.)

Alan



Re: [O] Removing the date in a subtree export using the new exporter

2012-11-09 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Alan Schmitt alan.schm...@polytechnique.org writes:

 I wanted to fix this and saw that you already did. However it seems that
 LaTeX still adds a date when a \maketitle happens with no date
 specified. This small patch should fix this.

 diff --git a/contrib/lisp/org-e-latex.el b/contrib/lisp/org-e-latex.el
 index 64908b9..9534a79 100644
 --- a/contrib/lisp/org-e-latex.el
 +++ b/contrib/lisp/org-e-latex.el
 @@ -1026,9 +1026,10 @@ holding export options.
   (format \\author{%s\\thanks{%s}}\n author email))
  ((or author email) (format \\author{%s}\n (or author email)
   ;; Date.
 - (when (plist-get info :with-date)
 + (if (plist-get info :with-date)
 (let ((date (org-export-data (plist-get info :date) info)))
 -(and date (format \\date{%s}\n date
 +(and date (format \\date{%s}\n date)))
 +   \\date{}\n)
   ;; Title
   (format \\title{%s}\n title)
   ;; Hyperref options.


 (Please let me know if it's not the good format to send the patch.)

It's better if you can provide a changelog entry and send it with git
format-patch. Also, if you did not sign FSF papers, you will have to
add TINYCHANGE at the end of the change log.

Thank you.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou



Re: [O] Removing the date in a subtree export using the new exporter

2012-11-09 Thread Alan Schmitt
On 9 nov. 2012, at 18:01, Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com wrote:

 It's better if you can provide a changelog entry and send it with git
 format-patch. Also, if you did not sign FSF papers, you will have to
 add TINYCHANGE at the end of the change log.

I'll do this when I get back near a computer.

Also, about the FSF papers, is there a link for this procedure?

Thanks,

Alan



Re: [O] Removing the date in a subtree export using the new exporter

2012-11-09 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Alan Schmitt alan.schm...@polytechnique.org writes:

 I'll do this when I get back near a computer.

Great.

 Also, about the FSF papers, is there a link for this procedure?

Certainly: http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contribute.html (in particular
the second section, but the whole page in interesting).

It basically boils down to sending a text form to ass...@gnu.org.


Regards,



Re: [O] Removing the date in a subtree export using the new exporter

2012-11-09 Thread Alan Schmitt
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes:

 Alan Schmitt alan.schm...@polytechnique.org writes:

 I'll do this when I get back near a computer.

 Great.

Attached. With another question: should the patch be sent to the list,
or just to you (or any other process)?

 Also, about the FSF papers, is there a link for this procedure?

 Certainly: http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contribute.html (in particular
 the second section, but the whole page in interesting).

 It basically boils down to sending a text form to ass...@gnu.org.

I'll look into it.

Alan

From f11683e9de7b1073c6f474fd2236f584c44299e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alan Schmitt alan.schm...@polytechnique.org
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 19:12:37 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] org-export: Output \date{} in LaTeX export when :with-date
 is nil

* contrib/lisp/org-e-latex.el (org-e-latex-template):
  output \date{} instead of nothing when :with-date is nil

TINYCHANGE
---
 contrib/lisp/org-e-latex.el |5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/contrib/lisp/org-e-latex.el b/contrib/lisp/org-e-latex.el
index 64908b9..9534a79 100644
--- a/contrib/lisp/org-e-latex.el
+++ b/contrib/lisp/org-e-latex.el
@@ -1026,9 +1026,10 @@ holding export options.
 	  (format \\author{%s\\thanks{%s}}\n author email))
 	 ((or author email) (format \\author{%s}\n (or author email)
  ;; Date.
- (when (plist-get info :with-date)
+ (if (plist-get info :with-date)
(let ((date (org-export-data (plist-get info :date) info)))
-	 (and date (format \\date{%s}\n date
+	 (and date (format \\date{%s}\n date)))
+   \\date{}\n)
  ;; Title
  (format \\title{%s}\n title)
  ;; Hyperref options.
-- 
1.7.9.6 (Apple Git-31.1)



Re: [O] Removing the date in a subtree export using the new exporter

2012-11-09 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Alan Schmitt alan.schm...@polytechnique.org writes:

 Attached. 

Applied (with a slight twist). Thank you.

I've added you to the list of contributors without FSF assignment. Tell
me once you have signed them.

 With another question: should the patch be sent to the list,
 or just to you (or any other process)?

Please send any patch to the list.


Regards,



[O] Removing the date in a subtree export using the new exporter

2012-11-08 Thread Alan Schmitt
Hello,

I'm using the new exporter to create a pdf (through latex) of a subtree
of a huge file, and I want to remove some default information. I found
out a way to do it, but I'm not sure it's the right way. Here it is.

#+BEGIN_SRC org
:PROPERTIES:
:EXPORT_TITLE: Foo bar
:EXPORT_OPTIONS: toc:nil author:nil
:EXPORT_DATE: ~
:END:
#+END_SRC

The part about which I'm not sure is how to remove the date. I tried
putting nothing instead of the '~' but it does not work. Maybe there
could be an option for it?

Alan



Re: [O] Removing the date in a subtree export using the new exporter

2012-11-08 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello,

Alan Schmitt alan.schm...@polytechnique.org writes:

 I'm using the new exporter to create a pdf (through latex) of a subtree
 of a huge file, and I want to remove some default information. I found
 out a way to do it, but I'm not sure it's the right way. Here it is.

 #+BEGIN_SRC org
 :PROPERTIES:
 :EXPORT_TITLE: Foo bar
 :EXPORT_OPTIONS: toc:nil author:nil
 :EXPORT_DATE: ~
 :END:
 #+END_SRC

 The part about which I'm not sure is how to remove the date. I tried
 putting nothing instead of the '~' but it does not work. Maybe there
 could be an option for it?

Indeed, there could be a date:nil option. I'll add it later. Thanks
for suggesting it.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou