Re: [O] Warning about section named Footnotes
Dear Nicolas,
Attached is the formatted patch. I think my email client mangled it last
time, as I pasted it inside the email body.
Best regards,
Arni
On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
I have revised the paragraph following your suggestion, and prepared
the patch using the 'git format-patch' command. See below.
Thank you. However, I'm unable to apply it. Could you try to update Org
first and send it again as an attachment?
Also, you need to specify the node modified in the commit message.
In the past, I have signed FSF papers for Emacs and Texinfo
contributions. Does that cover this contribution as well? If not, I'm
happy with the TINYCHANGE stamp.
The stamp is not needed, then.
From 72bda40525eed23941046694382814e3d04d9b97 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arni Magnusson arn...@hafro.is
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 16:08:43 +
Subject: [PATCH] Add documentation regarding reserved keywords in @node
Headlines
---
doc/org.texi | 8 +++-
doc/orgguide.texi | 6 +-
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/org.texi b/doc/org.texi
index bec46a9..8c7e3c3 100644
--- a/doc/org.texi
+++ b/doc/org.texi
@@ -1208,7 +1208,13 @@ headings indented less than 30 stars.}. For example:
* Another top level headline
@end example
-@noindent Some people find the many stars too noisy and would prefer an
+@vindex org-footnote-section
+@noindent Note that a headline named after @code{org-footnote-section},
+which defaults to @samp{Footnotes}, is considered as special. A subtree
+with this headline will be silently ignored by exporting functions,
+unless the value of @code{org-footnote-section} is modified.
+
+Some people find the many stars too noisy and would prefer an
outline that has whitespace followed by a single star as headline
starters. @ref{Clean view}, describes a setup to realize this.
diff --git a/doc/orgguide.texi b/doc/orgguide.texi
index e32fa7c..7308d32 100644
--- a/doc/orgguide.texi
+++ b/doc/orgguide.texi
@@ -345,7 +345,11 @@ of @kbd{C-a} and @kbd{C-e} in headlines.}. For example:
* Another top level headline
@end smallexample
-@noindent
+@noindent Note that a headline named after @code{org-footnote-section},
+which defaults to @samp{Footnotes}, is considered as special. A subtree
+with this headline will be silently ignored by exporting functions,
+unless the value of @code{org-footnote-section} is modified.
+
Some people find the many stars too noisy and would prefer an
outline that has whitespace followed by a single star as headline
starters. @ref{Clean view}, describes a setup to realize this.
--
1.8.3.1
Re: [O] Warning about section named Footnotes
Hello, Arni Magnusson arn...@hafro.is writes: Attached is the formatted patch. I think my email client mangled it last time, as I pasted it inside the email body. Applied, with a small removal (last part of the sentence, which I found unnecessary). Thank you. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
Re: [O] Warning about section named Footnotes
Arni Magnusson arn...@hafro.is writes: I have revised the paragraph following your suggestion, and prepared the patch using the 'git format-patch' command. See below. Thank you. However, I'm unable to apply it. Could you try to update Org first and send it again as an attachment? Also, you need to specify the node modified in the commit message. In the past, I have signed FSF papers for Emacs and Texinfo contributions. Does that cover this contribution as well? If not, I'm happy with the TINYCHANGE stamp. The stamp is not needed, then. Regards,
Re: [O] Warning about section named Footnotes
Dear Nicolas,
I have revised the paragraph following your suggestion, and prepared the
patch using the 'git format-patch' command. See below.
In the past, I have signed FSF papers for Emacs and Texinfo contributions.
Does that cover this contribution as well? If not, I'm happy with the
TINYCHANGE stamp.
Best regards,
Arni
From 95f8aeead236eb6920fe315d9fe6348fb19ab975 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arni Magnusson arn...@hafro.is
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 01:27:36 +
Subject: [PATCH] Warning about section named Footnotes
---
doc/org.texi | 8 +++-
doc/orgguide.texi | 6 +-
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/org.texi b/doc/org.texi
index ed2eb5a..8368916 100644
--- a/doc/org.texi
+++ b/doc/org.texi
@@ -1209,7 +1209,13 @@ headings indented less then 30 stars.}. For example:
* Another top level headline
@end example
-@noindent Some people find the many stars too noisy and would prefer an
+@vindex org-footnote-section
+@noindent Note that a headline named after @code{org-footnote-section},
+which defaults to @samp{Footnotes}, is considered as special. A subtree
+with this headline will be silently ignored by exporting functions,
+unless the value of @code{org-footnote-section} is modified.
+
+Some people find the many stars too noisy and would prefer an
outline that has whitespace followed by a single star as headline
starters. @ref{Clean view}, describes a setup to realize this.
diff --git a/doc/orgguide.texi b/doc/orgguide.texi
index e32fa7c..7308d32 100644
--- a/doc/orgguide.texi
+++ b/doc/orgguide.texi
@@ -345,7 +345,11 @@ of @kbd{C-a} and @kbd{C-e} in headlines.}. For example:
* Another top level headline
@end smallexample
-@noindent
+@noindent Note that a headline named after @code{org-footnote-section},
+which defaults to @samp{Footnotes}, is considered as special. A subtree
+with this headline will be silently ignored by exporting functions,
+unless the value of @code{org-footnote-section} is modified.
+
Some people find the many stars too noisy and would prefer an
outline that has whitespace followed by a single star as headline
starters. @ref{Clean view}, describes a setup to realize this.
--
1.9.3
Re: [O] Warning about section named Footnotes
Arni Magnusson arn...@hafro.is writes:
The location of the second patch (in orgguide.texi) is line 348:
Thanks for the patch.
@ vindex org-footnote-section
@ noindent Note that the headline @samp{Footnotes} is a @emph{reserved}
name. A subtree with this headline will be silently ignored by exporting
functions, unless the value of @code{org-footnote-section} is
modified.
I think we should emphasize `org-footnote-section' over Footnotes
which is but its default value. E.g.,
Note that a headline named after `org-footnote-section', which defaults
to @samp{Footnotes}, is considered as special...
Also, Texinfo requires two spaces after a sentence.
Enventually, could you provide the patch with a proper commit message,
using git format-patch? You need to add TINYCHANGE at the end of the
message if you haven't signed FSF papers yet.
Regards,
[O] Warning about section named Footnotes
Dear Org maintainers, I was using Org to write a software manual with a structure along the lines of: * Equations How to write equations in software FOO. * Footnotes How to write footnotes in software FOO. * Images How to insert images in software FOO. When I exported the document (to LaTeX and HTML), I was puzzled to find that one of the sections was not exported at all... After investigating the problem for a while, I realized that if a section is named Footnotes the default behavior of Org is to ignore it silently. My solution was to set `org-footnote-section' to nil. I think it would help Org users if: 1. Org export (to LaTeX, HTML, etc.) emits an error or a prominent warning when it ignores an entire section like this. 2. The manual would warn the user about this behavior with a prominent warning. Thanks for maintaining Org-mode. I'm finding it quite convenient for a variety of tasks. Arni
Re: [O] Warning about section named Footnotes
Hello, Arni Magnusson arn...@hafro.is writes: I was using Org to write a software manual with a structure along the lines of: * Equations How to write equations in software FOO. * Footnotes How to write footnotes in software FOO. * Images How to insert images in software FOO. When I exported the document (to LaTeX and HTML), I was puzzled to find that one of the sections was not exported at all... After investigating the problem for a while, I realized that if a section is named Footnotes the default behavior of Org is to ignore it silently. My solution was to set `org-footnote-section' to nil. I think it would help Org users if: 1. Org export (to LaTeX, HTML, etc.) emits an error or a prominent warning when it ignores an entire section like this. It shouldn't. This is the expected behaviour. 2. The manual would warn the user about this behavior with a prominent warning. Would you mind suggesting a change to the manual? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
Re: [O] Warning about section named Footnotes
Sure.
I suggest inserting a short paragraph into section 2.2, both in the manual
and the compact guide. Working from today's snapshot of the repository,
the two patches are as follows.
$ diff org-before.texi org-after.texi
1212c1212,1217
@noindent Some people find the many stars too noisy and would prefer an
---
@vindex org-footnote-section
@noindent Note that the headline @samp{Footnotes} is a @emph{reserved}
name. A subtree with this headline will be silently ignored by exporting
functions, unless the value of @code{org-footnote-section} is modified.
Some people find the many stars too noisy and would prefer an
$ diff orgguide-before.texi orgguide-after.texi
@noindent
---
@noindent Note that the headline @samp{Footnotes} is a @emph{reserved}
name. A subtree with this headline will be silently ignored by exporting
functions, unless the value of @code{org-footnote-section} is modified.
Best regards,
Arni
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
I think it would help Org users if:
1. Org export (to LaTeX, HTML, etc.) emits an error or a prominent
warning when it ignores an entire section like this.
It shouldn't. This is the expected behaviour.
2. The manual would warn the user about this behavior with a prominent
warning.
Would you mind suggesting a change to the manual?
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
Re: [O] Warning about section named Footnotes
The location of the second patch (in orgguide.texi) is line 348:
348c348,351
Arni
-- Forwarded message --
Sure.
I suggest inserting a short paragraph into section 2.2, both in the manual
and the compact guide. Working from today's snapshot of the repository,
the two patches are as follows.
$ diff org-before.texi org-after.texi
1212c1212,1217
@noindent Some people find the many stars too noisy and would prefer an
---
@ vindex org-footnote-section
@ noindent Note that the headline @samp{Footnotes} is a @emph{reserved}
name. A subtree with this headline will be silently ignored by exporting
functions, unless the value of @code{org-footnote-section} is modified.
Some people find the many stars too noisy and would prefer an
$ diff orgguide-before.texi orgguide-after.texi
@noindent
---
@ noindent Note that the headline @samp{Footnotes} is a @emph{reserved}
name. A subtree with this headline will be silently ignored by exporting
functions, unless the value of @code{org-footnote-section} is modified.
Best regards,
Arni
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
I think it would help Org users if:
1. Org export (to LaTeX, HTML, etc.) emits an error or a prominent
warning when it ignores an entire section like this.
It shouldn't. This is the expected behaviour.
2. The manual would warn the user about this behavior with a prominent
warning.
Would you mind suggesting a change to the manual?
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
